It has been estimated that during locomotion in the cat, muscle afferents in a single limb would produce as many as 800 000 discharges per second (Prochazka & Gorassini, 1998). Such intense sensory feedback could trigger inappropriate reflex responses and detract from processing the most relevant sensory signals during movement. The need to regulate the action of afferent-evoked reflexes was discussed by Eccles & Lundberg (1959b) with regard to the flexion reflex. Under certain experimental conditions, the flexion reflex is evoked by the activation of group II and higher-threshold muscle, as well as joint and cutaneous afferents (Eccles & Lundberg, 1959a). Activation of some of these afferents during the movement could induce disruptive flexion reflexes (Eccles & Lundberg, 1959b). As detectors of static muscle length, group II afferents are active during many movements (see Prochazka et al. 1989). It would thus seem particularly important to modify group II reflex actions and avoid disruptive flexion reflexes during movement (Eccles & Lundberg, 1959b; Grillner & Shik, 1973). Accordingly during brainstem-evoked fictive locomotion, stimulation of certain group II afferents initiates extensor activity instead of evoking flexion reflexes (Perreault et al. 1995). There is evidence that one form of reflex regulation during movement involves a reduction in the central effects of sensory feedback. For example, during voluntary contractions in humans the group Ia monosynaptic excitation of heteronymous motoneurones is reduced at the onset of contraction (Hultborn et al. 1987). Furthermore, our ability to consciously detect afferent signals such as those produced by muscle twitches (Collins et al. 1998) and tactile stimuli (Williams et al. 1998) is decreased during voluntary movement. The inhibitory mechanisms responsible for these reduced sensory effects during voluntary movements are unknown but it has been suggested that a reduction in transmitter release via presynaptic inhibition of primary afferent terminals could play an important role (Hultborn et al. 1987; see Rossignol, 1996). Results from animal experimentation provide further evidence for a presynaptic regulation of primary afferent transmission during the execution of some motor programmes. During fictive locomotion, for example, primary afferents are subject to rhythmic depolarization (Gossard et al. 1989, 1991; Gossard, 1996) and the excitability of the terminals of afferents is increased (Duenas & Rudomin, 1988). Other motor activities in which presynaptic inhibition may modulate excitatory segmental afferent transmission include voiding (Angel et al. 1994; Buss & Shefchyk, 1999), scratching (Bayev & Kostyuk, 1981) and mastication (Kurasawa et al. 1988). The present study used an analysis of monosynaptic field potentials to determine if primary afferent transmission from hindlimb afferents to first-order spinal interneurones is reduced during fictive locomotion. Analysis of monosynaptic field potentials offers several advantages over intracellular recordings in this regard. Because field potentials result from ionic movements, their changes reflect alterations in the currents produced by synaptic transmission between the afferents and their target neurones. On the other hand, intracellular current clamp recordings do not reveal synaptic currents directly, but rather show the postsynaptic voltage changes which are also influenced by postsynaptic membrane conductance and impalement injury. Although all terminals of individual afferents may not be affected uniformly during locomotion, trends in the changes in synaptic transmission may be better appreciated by an analysis of extracellular recorded population responses than by intracellular recordings from single neurones. The strong association between the depression of monosynaptic field potentials and the presence of primary afferent depolarization (see Sypert et al. 1980, for group I afferents, and Riddell et al. 1995, for group II afferents) should aid in comparing results obtained during fictive locomotion and in other preparations. Therefore, to assess the regulation of synaptic transmission from hindlimb afferents during fictive locomotion, afferent-evoked extracellular field potentials were examined during locomotion evoked by stimulation of the mesencephalic locomotor region in decerebrate cats. This preparation has an advantage over drug-induced locomotion because the motor state of the animal can be readily changed from one of quiescence into locomotion. Results will show that there is a general reduction in dorsal and intermediate monosynaptic field potentials evoked by muscle and cutaneous afferents throughout the mid-lumbar to rostral sacral segments examined. This depression is most pronounced for group II field potentials recorded in intermediate spinal laminae. Preliminary results have been reported (Perreault et al. 1994; McCrea & Perreault, 1998).