1. Level- and sport-specific Star Excursion Balance Test performance in female volleyball players
- Author
-
Nicolò Danilo Vitale, Giuseppe Banfi, Giovanni Lombardi, Luca Cavaleri, Jacopo Antonino Vitale, Enrico Dazzan, Antonio La Torre, Paolo Mascagni, Vitale, Jacopo A., Vitale, Nicolò D., Cavaleri, Luca, Dazzan, Enrico, Lombardi, Giovanni, Mascagni, Paolo, la Torre, Antonio, and Banfi, Giuseppe
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Basketball ,Adolescent ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Balance test ,Football ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Postural Balance ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Dynamic balance ,Football players ,biology ,Athletes ,Excursion ,Orthopedic ,030229 sport sciences ,biology.organism_classification ,Volleyball ,Exercise Test ,Physical therapy ,Female ,Wounds and injurie ,Psychology ,human activities ,Sports - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Investigations of Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) performance differences between competition levels and sports are limited and results are inconsistent. The aim of the present study are: 1) to compare SEBT performance between elite and semi-professional female volleyball players; 2) to evaluate differences in SEBT scores between positions (Hitters, Middle Blockers, Setters, and Liberoes); and 3) to compare dynamic balance characteristics between professional female Italian volleyball players with NCAA Division I female athletes practicing six different sports (hockey, football, basketball, golf, softball, and volleyball). For the latter comparison, previously published data obtained from a study were used. METHODS: Fifty-one female volleyball players were grouped in two groups, elite athletes (EG; N.=27) and semi-professional players (SG; N.=24), and further categorized into hitters, middle blockers, setters, and liberos. Anterior (A), posteromedial (PM), and posterolateral (PL) distances, and composite score (COMP) of SEBT short form were studied. COMP was calculated as the average of the normalized distances across the three directions. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed for the A (right, P=0.014 and left, P=0.011), PL (right, P=0.017 and left, P=0.008), PM (P
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF