Search

Summary The proper subcellular localization of defense factors is an important part of the plant immune system. A key component for systemic resistance, lipid transfer protein (LTP)‐like AZI1, is needed for the systemic movement of the priming signal azelaic acid (AZA) and a pool of AZI1 exists at the site of AZA production, the plastid envelope. Moreover, after systemic defense‐triggering infections, the proportion of AZI1 localized to plastids increases. However, AZI1 does not possess a classical plastid transit peptide that can explain its localization. Instead, AZI1 uses a bipartite N‐terminal signature that allows for its plastid targeting. Furthermore, the kinases MPK3 and MPK6, associated with systemic immunity, promote the accumulation of AZI1 at plastids during priming induction. Our results indicate the existence of a mode of plastid targeting possibly related to defense responses., Significance Statement In this work, we studied how AZI1, a key factor for plant systemic immunity, localizes to plastids. We show that AZI1 belongs to a unique class of signal‐anchored proteins and that the defense‐associated kinases MPK3/6 affect its targeting/trafficking, which in turn might determine the magnitude of systemic movement of defense signal(s) for resistance and priming induction.

The Arabidopsis ACCELERATED CELL DEATH 2 (ACD2) protein protects cells from programmed cell death (PCD) caused by endogenous porphyrin-related molecules like red chlorophyll catabolite or exogenous protoporphyrin IX. We previously found that during bacterial infection, ACD2, a chlorophyll breakdown enzyme, localizes to both chloroplasts and mitochondria in leaves. Additionally, acd2 cells show mitochondrial dysfunction. In plants with acd2 and ACD2 (+) sectors, ACD2 functions cell autonomously, implicating a pro-death ACD2 substrate as being cell non-autonomous in promoting the spread of PCD. ACD2 targeted solely to mitochondria can reduce the accumulation of an ACD2 substrate that originates in chloroplasts, indicating that ACD2 substrate molecules are likely to be mobile within cells. Two different light-dependent reactive oxygen bursts in mitochondria play prominent and causal roles in the acd2 PCD phenotype. Finally, ACD2 can complement acd2 when targeted to mitochondria or chloroplasts, respectively, as long as it is catalytically active: the ability to bind substrate is not sufficient for ACD2 to function in vitro or in vivo. Together, the data suggest that ACD2 localizes dynamically during infection to protect cells from pro-death mobile substrate molecules, some of which may originate in chloroplasts, but have major effects on mitochondria.

Plant infection responses result from the interaction of pathogen-derived molecules with host components. For the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, these molecules are often effector proteins (Hops) that are injected into plant cells. P. syringae carrying hopW1-1 have restricted host range on some Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. At least two Arabidopsis genomic regions are important for the natural variation that conditions resistance to P. syringae/hopW1-1. HopW1-1 elicits a resistance response, and consequently the accumulation of the signal molecule salicylic acid (SA) and transcripts of HWI1 (HopW1-1-Induced Gene1). This work identified three HopW1-1-interacting (WIN) plant proteins: a putative acetylornithine transaminase (WIN1), a protein phosphatase (WIN2) and a firefly luciferase superfamily protein (WIN3). Importantly, WIN2 and WIN3 are partially required for HopW1-1-induced disease resistance, SA production and HWI1 expression. The requirement for WIN2 is specific for HopW1-1-induced resistance, whereas WIN3 is important for responses to several effectors. Overexpression of WIN2 or WIN3 confers resistance to virulent P. syringae, which is consistent with these proteins being defense components. Several known genes important for SA production or signaling are also partially (EDS1, NIM1/NPR1, ACD6 and ALD1) or strongly (PAD4) required for the robust resistance induced by HopW1-1, suggesting a key role for SA in the HopW1-1-induced resistance response. Finally, WIN1 is an essential protein, the overexpression of which over-rides the resistance response to HopW1-1 (and several other defense-inducing effectors), and delays SA and HWI1 induction. Thus, the WIN proteins have different roles in modulating plant defense.

The ACCELERATED CELL DEATH 6 (ACD6) protein, composed of an ankyrin-repeat domain and a predicted transmembrane region, is a necessary positive regulator of Arabidopsis defenses. ACD6 overexpression confers enhanced disease resistance by priming stronger and quicker defense responses during pathogen infection, plant development or treatment with an agonist of the key defense regulator salicylic acid (SA). Modulation of ACD6 affects both SA-dependent and SA-independent defenses. ACD6 localizes to the plasma membrane and is an integral membrane protein with a cytoplasmic ankyrin domain. An activated version of ACD6 with a predicted transmembrane helix mutation called ACD6-1 has the same localization and overall topology as the wild-type protein. A genetic screen for mutants that suppress acd6-1-conferred phenotypes identified 17 intragenic mutations of ACD6. The majority of these mutations reside in the ankyrin domain and in predicted transmembrane helices, suggesting that both ankyrin and transmembrane domains are important for ACD6 function. One mutation (S638F) also identified a key residue in a putative loop between two transmembrane helices. This mutation did not alter the stability or localization of ACD6, suggesting that S635 is a critical residue for ACD6 function. Based on structural modeling, two ankyrin domain mutations are predicted to be in surface-accessible residues. As ankyrin repeats are protein interaction modules, these mutations may disrupt protein-protein interactions. A plausible scenario is that information exchange between the ankyrin and transmembrane domains is involved in activating defense signaling.

Plant cells undergoing programmed cell death (PCD) at late stages typically show chromatin condensation and endonucleolytic cleavage prior to obvious membrane or organelle ultrastructural changes. To investigate possible early PCD-associated events, we used microscopic observations and flow cytometry to quantitate mitochondrial membrane potential (DeltaPsim) changes during PCD at the single cell and population levels using Arabidopsis protoplasts. A DeltaPsim loss was commonly induced early during plant PCD and was important for PCD execution, as evidenced by the concomitant reduction of the change in DeltaPsim and PCD by cyclosporin A, which inhibits mitochondrial permeability transition pores in animal cells. DeltaPsim loss occurred prior to nuclear morphological changes and was only associated with mitochondrial cytochrome c release (an apoptotic trigger in animals) in response to one of three PCD elicitors. Three different stimuli in wild type implicated DeltaPsim changes in PCD: ceramide, protoporphyrin IX, and the hypersensitive response elicitor AvrRpt2. Additionally, the behavior of the conditional ectopic cell death mutant accelerated cell death2 and ACD2-overproducing plants also implicated DeltaPsim alteration as key for PCD execution. Because ACD2 is largely a chloroplast component in mature plants, the observation that the cell death in acd2 mutants requires changes in mitochondrial functions implicates communication between chloroplasts and mitochondria in mediating PCD activation. We suggest that DeltaPsim loss is a common early marker in plant PCD, similar to what has been documented in animals. However, unlike in animal cells, in plant cells, mitochondrial cytochrome c release is not an obligatory step in PCD control.

The Arabidopsis thaliana agd2-like defense response protein1 (ald1) mutant was previously found to be hypersusceptible to the virulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and had reduced accumulation of the defense signal salicylic acid (SA). ALD1 was shown to possess aminotransferase activity in vitro, suggesting it generates an amino acid-derived defense signal. We now find ALD1 to be a key defense component that acts in multiple contexts and partially requires the PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT4 (PAD4) defense regulatory gene for its expression in response to infection. ald1 plants have increased susceptibility to avirulent P. syringae strains, are unable to activate systemic acquired resistance and are compromised for resistance to the oomycete pathogen Peronospora parasitica in mutants with constitutively active defenses. ALD1 and PAD4 can act additively to control SA, PATHOGENESIS RELATED GENE1 (PR1) transcript and camalexin (an antimicrobial metabolite) accumulation as well as disease resistance. Finally, ALD1 and PAD4 can mutually affect each other's expression in a constitutive defense mutant, suggesting that these two genes can act in a signal amplification loop.

A novel Arabidopsis mutant has been identified with constitutive expression of GST1-GUS using plants with a pathogen-responsive reporter transgene containing the beta-glucuronidase (GUS) coding region driven by the GST1 promoter. The recessive mutant, called agd2 (aberrant growth and death2), has salicylic acid (SA)-dependent increased resistance to virulent and avirulent strains of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, elevated SA levels, a low level of spontaneous cell death, callose deposition, and enlarged cells in leaves. The enhanced resistance of agd2 to virulent P. syringae requires the SA signaling component NONEXPRESSOR OF PR1 (NPR1). However, agd2 renders the resistance response to P. syringae carrying avrRpt2 NPR1-independent. Thus agd2 affects both an SA- and NPR1-dependent general defense pathway and an SA-dependent, NPR1-independent pathway that is active during the recognition of avirulent P. syringae. agd2 plants also fail to show a hypersensitive cell death response (HR) unless NPR1 is removed. This novel function for NPR1 is also apparent in otherwise wild-type plants: npr1 mutants show a stronger HR, while NPR1-overproducing plants show a weaker HR when infected with P. syringae carrying the avrRpm1 gene. Spontaneous cell death in agd2 is partially suppressed by npr1, indicating that NPR1 can suppress or enhance cell death depending on the cellular context. agd2 plants depleted of SA show a dramatic exacerbation of the cell-growth phenotype and increased callose deposition, suggesting a role for SA in regulating growth and this cell-wall modification. AGD2 may function in cell death and/or growth control as well as the defense response, similarly to what has been described in animals for the functions of NFkappaB.

Salicylic acid (SA) plays a key role in activating defenses and cell death during plant-pathogen interactions. In response to some pathogens, SA also limits the extent of cell death, indicating that it acts positively or negatively depending on the host-pathogen interaction. In addition, we previously showed that SA affects cell growth in the Arabidopsis defense-related mutants accelerated cell death 6-1 (acd6-1) and aberrant growth and death 2 (agd2). Using acd6-1, agd2 and two other defense-related mutants, lesion simulating disease 6 (lsd6), suppressor of SA-insensitivity (ssi1), we show here in detail that SA regulates cell growth by specifically affecting cell enlargement, endoreduplication and/or cell division. We find that SA can act either positively or negatively to regulate cell growth depending on the context in which signaling occurs. Additionally, Nonexpressor of PR 1 (NPR1), a key SA signaling protein important for regulating defenses and cell death, also acts to promote cell division and/or suppress endoreduplication during leaf development. We propose that SA interacts with multiple receptors or signaling pathways to control cellular alterations during normal development, pathogen attack and/or stress situations. We suggest that SA and NPR1 play broader roles in cell fate control than has previously been understood.

PubMedID: 9839466 The metallothionein gene, LSC54, shows increased expression during leaf senescence in Brassica napus and Arabidopsis thaliana. A number of abiotic and biotic stresses have been shown to induce senescence-like symptoms in plants and, to investigate this further, the promoter of the LSC54 gene was cloned and fused to the GUS gene and transformed into Arabidopsis. The promoter was highly induced during leaf senescence and also in response to wounding; histochemical analysis indicated that this induction was localised to a few cells close to the wound site. The transgenic Arabidopsis tissue was infected with compatible and incompatible isolates of both the fungal biotroph, Peronospora parasitica and the bacterial necrotroph, Pseudomonas syringae. Incompatible isolates induced rapid cell death (the hypersensitive response) at the site of infection and, with both pathogens, early, localised expression of the GUS gene was observed. In contrast, relatively slow induction of the GUS gene was seen in the compatible interaction and this was correlated with the appearance of senescence-like symptoms in the biotrophic interaction and cell death by necrosis that occurred in response to the necrotrophic pathogen. These results suggest that there are common steps in the signalling pathways that lead to cell death in the hypersensitive response, pathogen induced necrosis and senescence.

Mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana which exhibit accelerated cell death in response to pathogens were isolated and characterized to gain insight into how symptom severity and disease resistance are modulated. This paper describes mutants that fall into one of two complementation groups that were identified. A novel feature of these mutants is that they are unable to control the rate and extent of cell death after exposure to a variety of stimuli that induce senescence responses. Thus, accelerated cell death (acd1) mutants show rapid, spreading necrotic responses to both virulent and avirulent Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola or pv. tomato pathogens and to ethylene. In addition, they develop necrotic lesions as they age and are sensitive to mechanical stress in a developmentally controlled manner. The acd1 mutants are also susceptible to opportunistic pathogens and show decreased growth inhibition of a heterologous pathogen of bean. The signal for lesion formation is not necessarily due to pathogens or wounding since plants grown aseptically also develop necrotic lesions. The lesions formed under a variety of conditions resemble those produced during a pathogen-induced rapid cell death response (the hypersensitive response, HR). Analysis of these acd1 mutants may help to explain the molecular basis of the HR and the relationship between this response and the normal process of senescence.