Search

Abstract We study, in this paper, a taxi-sharing problem, called Dial-a-Ride problem with money as an incentive (DARP-M). This problem consists in defining a set of taxis that will be shared by different clients in order to reduce their bill by a given factor α < 1. To achieve this, each client shares the cost of the ride with other passengers. More precisely, the fragments of the ride in which the client is alone is fully paid by this client and, for each fragment in which the client shares the taxi with other passengers, the cost is equally divided between the passengers. In addition to this cost constraint, the taxi must satisfy a time window constraint for each passenger and a capacity constraint. We define three versions of the problem: max-DARP-M where the objective is to drive the maximum number of clients with an arbitrarily large number of taxis; max-1-DARP-M in which we want to drive the maximum number of clients with one taxi; and 1-DARP-M which consists in deciding whether it is possible to drive at least one client while satisfying the constraints. We study the parameterized complexity and approximability of those problems with respect to four parameters: the factor α , the capacity c a p a of the taxis, the maximum size TW of the time windows of the clients, and the value S of an optimal solution. Among other results, we prove that 1-DARP-M is NP-Complete and max-DARP-M and max-1-DARP-M cannot be approximated in polynomial time to within any variable ratio even if α , c a p a and TW are fixed and if the road network is a planar graph. We also give a polynomial algorithm for max-1-DARP-M for the case where c a p a and TW are fixed and where the network does not contain a circuit. This algorithm implies a 1 n -polynomial approximation for max-DARP-M. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Graph editing problems offer an interesting perspective on sub- and supergraph identification problems for a large variety of target properties. They have also attracted significant attention in recent years, particularly in the area of parameterized complexity as the problems have rich parameter ecologies. In this paper we examine generalisations of the notion of editing a graph to obtain a regular subgraph. In particular we extend the notion of regularity to include two variants of edge-regularity along with the unifying constraint of strong regularity. We present a number of results, with the central observation that these problems retain the general complexity profile of their regularity-based inspiration: when the number of edits k and the maximum degree r are taken together as a combined parameter, the problems are tractable (i.e. in FPT ), but are otherwise intractable. We also examine variants of the basic editing to obtain a regular subgraph problem from the perspective of parameterizing by the treewidth of the input graph. In this case the treewidth of the input graph essentially becomes a limiting parameter on the natural k + r parameterization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the Possible winner problem in computational social choice theory, we are given a set of partial preferences and the question is whether a distinguished candidate could be made winner by extending the partial preferences to linear preferences. Previous work has provided, for many common voting rules, fixed parameter tractable algorithms for the Possible winner problem, with number of candidates as the parameter. However, the corresponding kernelization question is still open and in fact, has been mentioned as a key research challenge [10] . In this paper, we settle this open question for many common voting rules. We show that the Possible winner problem for maximin, Copeland, Bucklin, ranked pairs, and a class of scoring rules that includes the Borda voting rule does not admit a polynomial kernel with the number of candidates as the parameter. We show however that the Coalitional manipulation problem which is an important special case of the Possible winner problem does admit a polynomial kernel for maximin, Copeland, ranked pairs, and a class of scoring rules that includes the Borda voting rule, when the number of manipulators is polynomial in the number of candidates. A significant conclusion of our work is that the Possible winner problem is harder than the Coalitional manipulation problem since the Coalitional manipulation problem admits a polynomial kernel whereas the Possible winner problem does not admit a polynomial kernel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Closest String problem asks to find a string s which is not too far from each string in a set of m input strings, where the distance is taken as the Hamming distance. This well-studied problem has various applications in computational biology and drug design. In this paper, we introduce a new variant of Closest String where the input strings can contain wildcards that can match any letter in the alphabet, and the goal is to find a solution string without wildcards. We call this problem the Closest String with Wildcards problem, and we analyze it in the framework of parameterized complexity. Our study determines for each natural parameterization whether this parameterization yields a fixed-parameter algorithm, or whether such an algorithm is highly unlikely to exist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]