Search

The authors report the use of high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS) for the quantification of indomethacin (IND) in plasma with microscale sample preparation. Plasma samples (100 microL) and mefanamic acid (internal standard [IS]), buffered to pH 3.5, were prepared using solid phase extraction and chromatographed using a C8 column. The mobile phase composition was 80% methanol to 20% ammonium acetate buffer (40 mM, pH 5.1). A flow rate of 300 microL per minute was used with a 1-to-12 postcolumn split into the mass spectrometer. Selected reaction monitoring with mass transitions m/z 357.9-->139.0 and m/z 242-->209.0 were used for IND and IS, respectively. The chromatographic analysis time was 4 minutes. The assay was linear from 5 microg/L to 2000 microg/L with interday imprecision (n=5) over the analytic range (5%). At four concentrations (10 microg/L, 25 microg/L, 250 microg/L, 1500 microg/L), assay imprecision was 9% (total coefficient of variation [CV]) and accuracy ranged between 96.5% and 102.8% (n=16). The absolute recovery of IND and IS was 74% (n=8) and 95% (n=24), respectively. This method was developed and validated in less than 10 working days, had a lower limit of quantification than reported HPLC-ultraviolet (UV) methods, and uses small sample volumes. These factors illustrate the power of HPLC-ESI-MS/MS for drug analysis. Furthermore, the ability of this method to measure IND over a wide concentration range makes it suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies.

Three automated immunoassays for digoxin in serum were evaluated--Abbott TDxII, Baxter Stratus, and Behring OPUS. The accuracy and precision of the assays were assessed by weighed-in controls and an external quality control program. Coefficients of variation of all methods in serum were < or = 10% at weighed-in concentrations of digoxin of 1 and 2.5 micrograms/L. Accuracy relative to weighed-in concentrations of 1 and 2.5 micrograms/L ranged from 98 to 126% for all methods. Comparative results from patient samples showed little difference between the TDxII and Stratus and a greater difference observed between the TDxII and OPUS assays. The detection of digoxin-free samples containing digoxin-like immunoreactive substances (DLIS) in neonatal cord blood, pregnant patients, and liver and renal recipients by each assay was then assessed. The TDxII exhibited the highest incidence of DLIS. This is evident in neonatal cord blood in which 40.4% of samples tested positive. In comparison, the extent of DLIS detected by Stratus was less and OPUS exhibited no DLIS in any of the groups studied. A case study of a patient treated with anti-digoxin Fab fragments (Digibind) also was included for analysis by each method. Fourteen hours after Digibind administration, the TDxII registered a digoxin concentration of 49.5 micrograms/L compared with 3.73, 1.80, and 2.49 micrograms/L for Stratus, OPUS, and ultrafiltered TDxII methods, respectively. The results indicate that to determine the concentration of digoxin after the administration of Digiband, the OPUS or fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA)-ultrafiltered samples by TDxII are the assays of choice.