Search

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetic (PK) data of ganciclovir (GCV), a first-line antiviral treatment for cytomegalovirus infections, in critically ill patients are limited. This study aimed at characterizing GCV population PK and interindividual variability (IIV) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Secondary objectives were to identify patient characteristics responsible for IIV and simulate GCV exposure for different dosing regimens. METHOD: In this retrospective observational study, clinical data and serum GCV levels were collected from ICU patients on intravenous GCV. PK modeling, covariate analyses, and explorative Monte Carlo dosing simulations (MCS) were performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Bootstrap and visual predictive checks were used to determine model adequacy. RESULTS: In total, 128 GCV measurements were obtained from 34 patients. GCV PK conformed to a 1-compartment model with first-order elimination. After multivariate analyses, only the estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula (P < 0.001) was included as a covariate. In the final model, the estimated clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V1) were 2.3 L/h and 42 L, respectively, for a patient with the median CKD-EPI of the population (65 mL/min per 1.73 m). The association between CKD-EPI and CL decreased the residual variability from 0.56 to 0.43 and V1-IIV from 114% to 80%, whereas CL-IIV changed from 43% to 47%. MCS revealed that a substantial number of patients may not achieve the GCV PK/pharmacodynamic target trough level (>1.5 mg/L) when administering the label-recommended dose reductions for patients with CKD-EPI

Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: The International Interlaboratory Quality Control PROGRAM for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiretroviral Drugs in Human Plasma/Serum was initiated in 1999. We have previously published our experience during the first 10 years of the PROGRAM. Since 2010, 3 newly developed antiretroviral agents have been added to the PROGRAM: darunavir, etravirine, and raltegravir. The objective of this analysis is to describe the performance of participating laboratories measuring these newer agents in 2011-2012. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each year, laboratories received 2 blind samples of human plasma/serum spiked with a low (5.0 mg/L) concentration of these drugs. Laboratory results were standardized to percentages with reference to the nominal (true) concentration. Any result that deviated more than 20% of the nominal values was defined as inaccurate. RESULTS: The numbers of laboratories that participated by the end of 2012 were 44 for darunavir, 28 for etravirine, and 30 for raltegravir. A total of 357 results were evaluable for analysis. Of these, 64 (17.9%) results were reported with >20% deviation, so "inaccurate" (7.6% too low, 10.4% too high). The proportion of inaccurate results in 2011 was 21.3% for darunavir, 31.0% for etravirine, and 26.3% for raltegravir; in 2012, these figures improved to 8.1%, 23.2%, and 8.3% for darunavir, etravirine, and raltegravir, respectively. Taking darunavir as the reference, performance for etravirine was significantly lower [odds ratio = 0.462, 95% confidence interval: 0.246-0.866, P = 0.016] and performance for raltegravir was not significantly different. Low concentrations were significantly more frequently reported as inaccurate than medium or high concentrations: 28.6% versus 10.6% versus 8.8%, respectively (P < 0.001). Laboratories that used Liquid Chromatography with tandem Mass Spectrometry did not perform better than those using High Performance Liquid Chromatography/Ultrarapid Performance Liquid Chromatography: 41 inaccurate results in 200 samples (20.5%) versus 23 in 157 samples (14.6%, P = 0.154). Multiple logistic regression revealed that the concentration range was the only significant predictor of inaccurate results. The lower range of concentrations performed worse than medium or high concentrations (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Laboratories continue to have problems with adequately measuring low plasma concentrations of antiretroviral agents. This is particularly a problem for some of the newer antiretroviral agents with plasma concentrations in the