Search

A risk management plan (RMP) has an important role in assuring the optimal benefit-risk balance of a drug throughout its life cycle. However, no clear standards have been established for differentiating risk classification between "important identified risks" and "important potential risks". This study was a review and descriptive analysis for Japanese RMPs with a focus on antineoplastic agents to identify effective factors to discriminate an important identified risk from an important potential risk. Analysis based on 51 RMPs, reporting 310 important identified risks and 72 important potential risks, revealed significant associations between selection of the risk classification and several factors, including severe cases, actual cases in the Japanese population, availability of confirmatory trial data, and incidence of adverse events. Trend of the association was also found for discontinuation cases and immune-oncology agents [IO (drug type)]. These results suggest that consideration of these factors may be useful for coherent risk classification in creating a RMP.

In this study, differences in older patients between drug use as reported in clinical practice and in clinical trials for regulatory approval were examined.Electronic medical record (EMR) data such as patient background (age, sex), concomitant drugs, data on laboratory tests, and prescribed doses of drugs from outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, high blood pressure, or depression at Chiba University Hospital were obtained for the period from January 2003 to December 2012. These data were compared with data from relevant clinical trials for regulatory approval in order to examine differences in drug use.There were 5134 eligible patients. The prescribed doses of drugs were lower than the standard approved doses for depression and rheumatoid arthritis but were generally within the approved dose range for type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. When comparing the characteristics of older patients taking tacrolimus, 5.6% to 17.0% of those would not be able to participate in clinical trials because of liver or renal abnormality, and the incidence rates of some adverse drug events (ADEs) differed significantly between clinical practice and clinical trials.Appropriate doses of drugs for older patients may differ from approved doses in certain diseases. Complex situations such as a lot of polypharmacy, comorbidity, and functional impairment in older patients in clinical practice make it difficult to evaluate safety based on data from clinical trials. In the future, utilization of a database created from the EMR of older patients should be considered for assessment of drug safety in older patients in clinical practice.