Search

Background: The lack of label information for the pediatric population has been a global issue, leading to the introduction of several countermeasures by major health authorities. Despite various efforts by Japanese health authorities, some drugs are approved only for adults in Japan, while the United States (US) label includes information on pediatric usage for the same drugs. This suggests a potential for pediatric-specific drug loss in Japan, where overall drug loss has recently become a major concern. Methods: In this study, we compared the pediatric usage status between Japan and the US, focusing on the indications approved in both countries. Results: Of the 404 indications, 70 (17.3%) and 102 (25.2%) included pediatric usage in Japan and the US, respectively. The proportion of indications, including pediatric usage, was significantly higher in the US than in Japan (χ2test, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of indications for pediatric usage in the US demonstrated that simultaneous development with adults (odds ratio (OR), 24.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 6.79–91.1) and Japan-first development (OR, 31.5; 95% CI, 2.59–384) were significantly affecting the inclusion of pediatric usage in Japan. Conclusions: Our results suggest that there was pediatric-specific drug loss in Japan compared to that in the US. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that US-first development and non-simultaneous development had a negative impact on the inclusion of pediatric usage in Japan; however, pediatric assessment request was not a significant factor. Further frameworks to promote pediatric drug development should be introduced in Japan to address pediatric-specific drug loss issues.

Purpose: Postoperative adhesions can be prevented by the use of bioabsorbable anti-adhesion barriers. Although the occurrence of postoperative bowel obstruction is an important concern for patients, at the time of approval of anti-adhesion barriers, its effectiveness in preventing postoperative bowel obstruction had not been evaluated. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the incidence of bowel obstruction after colectomy in patients with colon cancer using an insurance claims database. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the data of colon cancer patients (between 2005 and 2017 from a national insurance claims database) who underwent colectomies to compare the proportion of individuals with postoperative bowel obstruction between the barrier and no barrier groups. Results: Of the 587 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 308 and 279 patients were identified as the barrier and no barrier groups, respectively. The incidence of postoperative bowel obstruction was significantly lower in the barrier group (log-rank test, P= 0.0483). The cumulative incidence of postoperative bowel obstruction 37 months after the initial colectomy was 6.1% and 10.9% in the barrier and no barrier groups, respectively. Moreover, consistent results were obtained in the matched cohort. Conclusion: In colectomies for patients with colon cancer, the use of anti-adhesion barriers could significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative bowel obstruction. Evaluations using insurance claims databases could provide important information on outcomes following implementation of medical devices.

Background: The number of diabetes patients is steadily increasing worldwide. Consequently, the social burden of diabetes is huge, requiring urgent countermeasures. We performed an intensive survey of antidiabetic drugs approved in Japan, the United States, and the European Union.Methods: Information about approved antidiabetic drugs was obtained by searching databases of regulatory authorities in the 3 regions. Other relevant information was also obtained from publicly available literature and documents.Results: No difference in the total number and types of approved drugs among the 3 regions was found (P= .173 by log-rank test). However, the numbers of approved dipeptidyl peptidase-4 and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in Japan were almost double of those in the other regions. The average sample size in clinical trials used for antidiabetic drug approval in Japan (1134 patients) was much smaller than that in the other regions (P< .001 by analysis of variance repeated measures test adjusted by the Holm method). Currently, 6 drugs with known modes of action are being developed for type 1 diabetes in Japan, whereas at the end of 2016, nearly 7-fold more products with novel modes of action were in clinical development in the United States.Conclusion: Antidiabetic drug development in Japan costs less than that in the other regions, although novel development is less active because of regulatory differences. To achieve better pharmacotherapy for diabetes, the regulatory framework requires careful consideration.

Background: Japan has been preparing to implement a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) process in 2018. Through a 2-year pilot program implemented in 2016, the government examined the criteria for applicable products and the necessary infrastructure to review both the content and quality of the data and to conduct cost-effectiveness assessments to be incorporated into the current Japanese reimbursement and pricing scheme. A survey of the pharmaceutical industry was conducted to understand the current landscape and to identify issues and challenges of implementing HTA in Japan.Methods: A semi-structured 19-item questionnaire was designed, and a survey was conducted via face-to-face or phone interviews. Answers were transcribed in English after the interviews and confirmed by e-mail. The survey focuses on pharmaceutical companies that develop new innovative products to be associated with the planned HTA.Results: Differences between Japanese and global pharmaceutical companies were observed in terms of dedicated HTA teams in place, the use of quality of life data, and relationships with external vendors. Addressing a shortage of HTA professionals in Japan is critical to implement HTA. The survey found that list prices compared to those proposed by companies was an issue.Conclusions: Although the government decided to implement HTA for the pricing scheme in 2018, a shortage of experts and researchers remains a challenge. Findings suggest HTA should not be used solely to reduce pharmaceutical spending, as the impact by the HTA implementation will be temporary and discourage innovation.

Background: The number of diabetes patients is steadily increasing worldwide. Consequently, the social burden of diabetes is huge, requiring urgent countermeasures. We performed an intensive survey of antidiabetic drugs approved in Japan, the United States, and the European Union Methods: Information about approved antidiabetic drugs was obtained by searching databases of regulatory authorities in the 3 regions. Other relevant information was also obtained from publicly available literature and documents Results: No difference in the total number and types of approved drugs among the 3 regions was found (P=.173 by log-rank test). However, the numbers of approved dipeptidyl peptidase-4 and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in Japan were almost double of those in the other regions. The average sample size in clinical trials used for antidiabetic drug approval in Japan (1134 patients) was much smaller than that in the other regions (P&lt;.001 by analysis of variance repeated measures test adjusted by the Holm method). Currently, 6 drugs with known modes of action are being developed for type 1 diabetes in Japan, whereas at the end of 2016, nearly 7-fold more products with novel modes of action were in clinical development in the United States Conclusion: Antidiabetic drug development in Japan costs less than that in the other regions, although novel development is less active because of regulatory differences. To achieve better pharmacotherapy for diabetes, the regulatory framework requires careful consideration

Background: Japan has been preparing to implement a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) process in 2018. Through a 2-year pilot program implemented in 2016, the government examined the criteria for applicable products and the necessary infrastructure to review both the content and quality of the data and to conduct cost-effectiveness assessments to be incorporated into the current Japanese reimbursement and pricing scheme. A survey of the pharmaceutical industry was conducted to understand the current landscape and to identify issues and challenges of implementing HTA in Japan Methods: A semi-structured 19-item questionnaire was designed, and a survey was conducted via face-to-face or phone interviews. Answers were transcribed in English after the interviews and confirmed by e-mail. The survey focuses on pharmaceutical companies that develop new innovative products to be associated with the planned HTA Results: Differences between Japanese and global pharmaceutical companies were observed in terms of dedicated HTA teams in place, the use of quality of life data, and relationships with external vendors. Addressing a shortage of HTA professionals in Japan is critical to implement HTA. The survey found that list prices compared to those proposed by companies was an issue Conclusions: Although the government decided to implement HTA for the pricing scheme in 2018, a shortage of experts and researchers remains a challenge. Findings suggest HTA should not be used solely to reduce pharmaceutical spending, as the impact by the HTA implementation will be temporary and discourage innovation

Background: Recent trends in globalization and the complexity of drug development have resulted in the possibility that expedited programs in one country may now influence drug development in another. We examined the effects of expedited programs in the United States on the development of oncology drugs in Japan.Methods: Among oncology drugs approved in Japan between 2007 and 2016, we analyzed those that were approved in both the United States and Japan. The development period was calculated by subtracting the start date of the first clinical study or the investigational new drug application date from the drug approval date in the respective country. All data were obtained from publicly disclosed information.Results: We analyzed a total of 108 approvals for oncology drugs. The difference in the development start date between the United States and Japan for drugs granted Breakthrough Therapy designation was smaller than that for drugs without this designation (P< .01). The development period in Japan for drugs granted Breakthrough Therapy, Accelerated Approval or Fast Track designations was significantly shorter than that for drugs without these designations (P< .05). In addition, the development period of oncology drugs in Japan tended to be significantly shorter as the number of expedited program designations increased (P< .006 for trend).Conclusions: The characteristics and the target disease of the drug that could be eligible for expedited program(s) in the United States, which was supported by the designation, were one of the factors influencing the development of oncology drugs in Japan.

Background: Recent trends in globalization and the complexity of drug development have resulted in the possibility that expedited programs in one country may now influence drug development in another. We examined the effects of expedited programs in the United States on the development of oncology drugs in Japan. Methods: Among oncology drugs approved in Japan between 2007 and 2016, we analyzed those that were approved in both the United States and Japan. The development period was calculated by subtracting the start date of the first clinical study or the investigational new drug application date from the drug approval date in the respective country. All data were obtained from publicly disclosed information. Results: We analyzed a total of 108 approvals for oncology drugs. The difference in the development start date between the United States and Japan for drugs granted Breakthrough Therapy designation was smaller than that for drugs without this designation (P&lt;.01). The development period in Japan for drugs granted Breakthrough Therapy, Accelerated Approval or Fast Track designations was significantly shorter than that for drugs without these designations (P&lt;.05). In addition, the development period of oncology drugs in Japan tended to be significantly shorter as the number of expedited program designations increased (P&lt;.006 for trend). Conclusions: The characteristics and the target disease of the drug that could be eligible for expedited program(s) in the United States, which was supported by the designation, were one of the factors influencing the development of oncology drugs in Japan.

Background: Efforts to promote the development of pediatric pharmacotherapy include regulatory frameworks and close collaboration between the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. We characterized the current status of pediatric clinical trials conducted in the United States by the pharmaceutical industry, focusing on the involvement of the European Union member countries, to clarify the industry perspective. Methods: Data on US pediatric clinical trials were obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov. Binary regression analysis was performed to identify what factors influence the likelihood of involvement of European Union countries. Results: A total of 633 US pediatric clinical trials that met inclusion criteria were extracted and surveyed. Of these, 206 (32.5%) involved a European Union country site(s). The results of binary regression analysis indicated that attribution of industry, phase, disease area, and age of pediatric participants influenced the likelihood of the involvement of European Union countries in US pediatric clinical trials. Relatively complicated or large pediatric clinical trials, such as phase II and III trials and those that included a broad age range of participants, had a significantly greater likelihood of the involvement of European Union countries (P&lt;.05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that (1) the pharmaceutical industry utilizes regulatory frameworks in making business decisions regarding pediatric clinical trials, (2) disease area affects the involvement of European Union countries, and (3) feasibility of clinical trials is mainly concerned by pharmaceutical industry for pediatric drug development. Additional incentives for high marketability may further motivate pharmaceutical industry to develop pediatric drugs.

Background: Efforts to promote the development of pediatric pharmacotherapy include regulatory frameworks and close collaboration between the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. We characterized the current status of pediatric clinical trials conducted in the United States by the pharmaceutical industry, focusing on the involvement of the European Union member countries, to clarify the industry perspective.Methods: Data on US pediatric clinical trials were obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov. Binary regression analysis was performed to identify what factors influence the likelihood of involvement of European Union countries.Results: A total of 633 US pediatric clinical trials that met inclusion criteria were extracted and surveyed. Of these, 206 (32.5%) involved a European Union country site(s). The results of binary regression analysis indicated that attribution of industry, phase, disease area, and age of pediatric participants influenced the likelihood of the involvement of European Union countries in US pediatric clinical trials. Relatively complicated or large pediatric clinical trials, such as phase II and III trials and those that included a broad age range of participants, had a significantly greater likelihood of the involvement of European Union countries (P< .05).Conclusion: Our results suggest that (1) the pharmaceutical industry utilizes regulatory frameworks in making business decisions regarding pediatric clinical trials, (2) disease area affects the involvement of European Union countries, and (3) feasibility of clinical trials is mainly concerned by pharmaceutical industry for pediatric drug development. Additional incentives for high marketability may further motivate pharmaceutical industry to develop pediatric drugs.