Search

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard treatment for advanced lung cancer, but immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) remain poorly understood, especially in a real‐world setting. Methods: A multicenter observational study was conducted. Medical records of lung cancer patients treated with ICIs at 26 hospitals from January 1, 2015, to February 28, 2021, were retrieved. Types of ICIs included antiprogrammed cell death 1 or antiprogrammed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) monotherapy, anticytotoxic T‐lymphocyte antigen‐4 monotherapy, or combination therapy. Results: In total, 1905 patients with advanced lung cancer were evaluated. The median age was 63 (range 28–87) years, and the male/female ratio was 3.1:1 (1442/463). The primary histological subtype was adenocarcinoma (915). A total of 26.9% (512/1905) of the patients developed 671 irAEs, and 5.8% (110/1905) developed 120 grade 3–5 irAEs. Median duration from ICI initiation to irAEs onset was 56 (range 0–1160) days. The most common irAEs were thyroid dysfunction (7.2%, 138/1905), pneumonitis (6.5%, 124/1905), and dermatological toxicities (6.0%, 115/1905). A total of 162 irAEs were treated with steroids and 11 irAEs led to death. Patients with positive PD‐L1 expression (≥1%) and who received first‐line ICI treatment developed more irAEs. Patients who developed irAEs had a better disease control rate (DCR, 71.3% [365/512] vs. 56.0% [780/1145]; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The incidence rate of irAEs was 26.9% in a real‐world setting. IrAEs might be related to a better DCR, but clinicians should be more aware of irAE recognition and management in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies characterized by neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation. The Delta‐like protein 3 (DLL3), as a direct downstream target of ASCL1, is involved in NE differentiation and carcinogenesis of SCLC. This study aims to investigate the relationship between ASCL1 and DLL3 expressions and their clinicopathological implications in SCLC. Methods: A total of 247 surgically resected pure SCLC samples with limited clinical stage and follow‐up data were retrieved in this retrospective study. ASCL1 and DLL3 protein expression was detected by immunohistochemistry staining. The correlations between ASCL1 and DLL3 expressions, as well as their clinicopathological features, were analyzed by χ2 tests. Disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in SCLC patients with ASCL1/DLL3 low and high expressions were compared by the Kaplan‐Meier method and log‐rank tests. Results: ASCL1 high expression was detected in 105 (42.5%) patients. Its expression was positively correlated with the clinical stage (p = 0.02) and nerve invasion (p = 0.03). DLL3 high expression was observed in 188 (72.8%) patients and was correlated with vascular invasion (p = 0.04). ASCL1 expression was positively associated with DLL3 expression (p = 0.03). In addition, DLL3 expression has a strong correlation with the expression of thyroid transcription factor‐1 (TTF1) and conventional NE markers. Conclusion: ASCL1 and DLL3 were highly expressed in SCLC tumor samples, and a positive correlation between these two markers was observed. Co‐analysis of ASCL1 and DLL3 may identify a distinct SCLC subgroup benefit from targeted therapy. Therefore, ASCL1 and DLL3 could be potential biomarkers served for the selection of related patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is limited data on the clinical outcome, long‐term survival and tolerability of sequential therapy of first‐line crizotinib followed by alectinib in a real‐world setting for Chinese patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC. Methods: The medical records of patients who received sequential therapy with first‐line crizotinib followed by alectinib (no intermittent systemic therapy was allowed between the two ALK‐TKIs) were collected from six centers in China. Combined time treatment to failure (C‐TTF) was defined as the period from the start of crizotinib to the complete discontinuation of alectinib due to any cause. Results: A total of 61 patients were included in our study. Fifty‐two patients were switched to alectinib due to disease progression, seven as a result of toxicity, and two due to patient preference. At the time of data cutoff, alectinib treatment was discontinued in 31 patients on account of disease progression while severe adverse events resulted in cessation of alectinib in another two patients. Rebiopsy was conducted in 21 patients following disease progression on alectinib in whom ALK secondary mutation was found in 13 patients. Patients with ALK secondary mutation demonstrated better PFS during treatment with subsequent ALK‐TKIs compared with those without (10.4 vs. 3.1 m, p = 0.0018, HR = 0.08). With a median follow‐up of 34.3 months, C‐TTF was 39.2 months and estimated 5‐year OS was 68.6% in the overall population. Conclusion: Sequential therapy with first‐line crizotinib followed by alectinib demonstrated long‐term benefits. Different efficacy in subsequent ALK‐TKI between patients with or without ALK secondary mutation further emphasized the importance of rebiopsy to guide targeted therapy more precisely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: For advanced nonsquamous non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the mechanisms of resistance to first‐line immunotherapy are not clear. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with agents targeting other pathways may serve as second‐line therapy options. Apatinib (a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor) could increase the efficacy of camrelizumab (an ICI agent). The efficacy and safety of this combination regimen as a second‐line therapy for NSCLC patients after failure on first‐line immunotherapy has not previously been evaluated. Methods: In this single‐arm, multicenter, phase II trial, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC patients previously treated with single‐agent ICI or ICI plus chemotherapy will be enrolled. Participants will receive intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg D1 and oral apatinib 250 mg D1‐21 for a 21‐day cycle. The study treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint is progression‐free survival by investigator. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response by investigator, quality of life, safety, and toxicity. Conclusions: This trial will provide evidence of the benefit of treatment with camrelizumab combined with apatinib in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC patients who were previously treated with first‐line immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most aggressive lung cancers. Treatment of SCLC has remained unchanged during the past decades. Preclinical studies have revealed ASCL1 as a transcription regulator in the neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation and carcinogenesis of SCLC. However, there are few studies on correlation of ASCL1 expression and clinicopathological factors in resected SCLCs. Here, we aimed to analyze the ASCL1 expression of SCLC and investigate its associations with clinicopathological factors and survival. Methods: A total of 247 surgically resected pure SCLC specimens were included in this retrospective study, all of which were processed using tissue microarrays for immunohistochemistry analysis of ASCL1. A total of 48 of 247 cases were tested by NanoString for mRNA expression analysis on 50 SCLC related genes. Statistical analysis was performed using R studio and SPSS software. Results: NE scores of 48 pure SCLC specimens were calculated by analyzing 50 preselected genes. A significant correlation between NE score with both ASCL1 mRNA expression and ASCL1 protein expression were observed. For the entire cohort of 247 patients, ASCL1 was highly expressed in 42.5% of pure SCLC patients according to IHC results. Significant differences were observed between ASCL1 high and low expression groups in variables including staging, lymph node metastasis, nerve invasion and overall survival. Conclusions: In limited staged pure SCLC, ASCL1 expression was positively correlated with NE signature, pTNM stage, nerve invasion and OS. ASCL1 may therefore serve as a potential biomarker to predict prognosis as well as in the selection of patients for therapies targeting ASCL1‐regulated downstream molecules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]