Search

Abstract Introduction The use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) over conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) for early‐stage non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been advocated, but is also debated in the literature. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we adopted a target trial emulation framework to identify eligible patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2021 using the Taiwan Cancer Registry. In the primary analysis, the overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, whereas incidences of lung cancer mortality and radiation pulmonary toxicity were the secondary endpoints. Extensive supplementary analyses were also conducted. Results We included 351 patients in the primary analysis and found that the OS was not significantly different between the SABR (n = 290) and CFRT (n = 61) groups. The propensity score weighting adjusted hazard ratio of death was 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.53–1.07, p = 0.118). The secondary endpoints and supplementary analyses showed no significant differences. Conclusions The OS of patients with early‐stage NSCLC treated with SABR was not significantly different from that of patients treated with CFRT alone. The results of the relevant ongoing clinical trials are eagerly awaited.

Abstract Background Identifying patients with stage I non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at increased risk of tumor recurrence following surgery remains a major challenge. The current study aimed to compare disease‐free survival (DFS) rates after surgery between patients with clinically node‐positive (cN+) and ‐negative (cN0) stage I NSCLC. Methods Patients with pathological stage I resected NSCLC were identified from the lung cancer database of Changhua Christian Hospital in Taiwan. Patients with clinical N status 1 or 2 and pathological N status 0 were identified as the cN+/pN0 cohort, whereas others were identified as the cN0/pN0 cohort. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics between both cohorts. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate DFS. Results From January 2010 to July 2019, 754 eligible patients were enrolled into the study, among whom 41 (5.4%) were cN+/pN0. The median follow‐up time was 43.4 months. Before PSM, the 5‐year DFS rate was 79.0% and 90.3% in cN+/pN0 and cN0/pN0 cohorts (log‐rank test, p = 0.009), respectively. After a 1:4 PSM, multivariate analysis showed that the cN+/pN0 cohort still had a poorer DFS compared to the cN0/pN0 cohort in (hazard ratio, 3.17; p = 0.040). Conclusion Among patients with stage I resected NSCLC, cN+ patients had a worse DFS compared to cN0 patients. Surgeons should therefore consider more aggressive adjuvant therapy or frequent follow‐up in patients with surgically resected stage I NSCLC with cN+ status.

Abstract Background The treatment options for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BMs) include EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), whole‐brain radiotherapy, brain surgery, and antiangiogenesis therapy. As treatment options evolve, redefining optimal treatment strategies to improve survival are crucial. Methods A total of 150 EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients with BMs who received first‐ or second‐generation EGFR‐TKIs as first‐line treatment between January 2012 and October 2019 were included in this analysis. Results After multivariate analysis, patients with the graded prognostic assessment for lung cancer using molecular markers (Lung‐mol GPA) ≥3 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.538, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35–0.83), who received afatinib or erlotinib as first‐line treatment (HR: 0.521, 95% CI: 0.33–0.82), underwent SRS therapy (HR: 0.531, 95% CI: 0.32–0.87), or were sequentially treated with osimertinib (HR: 0.400, 95% CI: 0.23–0.71) were associated with improved overall survival (OS). Furthermore, SRS plus EGFR‐TKI provided more OS benefits in patients with Lung‐mol GPA ≥3 compared with EGFR‐TKI alone in our patient cohort (44.9 vs. 26.7 months, p = 0.005). The OS in patients who received sequential osimertinib therapy was significantly longer than those without osimertinib treatment (43.5 vs. 24.3 months, p

Background This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer who initially presented with respiratory failure. Methods This was a retrospective study which analyzed patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer who were placed on mechanical ventilation (MV). We defined newly diagnosed lung cancer as pathological or molecular results for treatment decisions not yet determined when the patient was admitted to ICU. Results During the 14‐year inclusion period, 845 lung cancer patients requiring MV were screened. A total of 56 newly diagnosed extensive lung cancer patients were analyzed. Cancer‐related to central airway obstruction (n = 29, 51.8%) was the leading cause of respiratory failure. The significant etiologies of delay in the diagnosis of lung cancer were diagnostic error, mistaking cancer for tuberculosis, and missed hilar lesions. The six‐month survival rate was only 7.1% (n = 4). The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was significantly associated with mortality (HR = 1.142, 95% CI = 1.012–1.288, P = 0.031). The six‐month survival rate in patients receiving suitable targeted therapy and accepting chemotherapy and best supportive care was 40% (2/5), 0% (0/7), and 4.5% (2/44), respectively. Conclusions Patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer with acute life‐threatening respiratory failure have poor outcomes. Cancer‐related to central airway obstruction is a leading cause of respiratory failure. Diagnostic errors such as tuberculosis and missed hilar lesions are the two main etiologies of a delay in diagnosis. The SOFA score is correlated with mortality. Targeted therapy can raise the six‐month survival rates in patients with oncogenic mutation adenocarcinoma, who survive after presentation in a critical condition.