Search

Toxicologic pathology is transitioning from analog to digital methods. This transition seems inevitable due to a host of ongoing social and medical technological forces. Of these, artificial intelligence (AI) and in particular machine learning (ML) are globally disruptive, rapidly growing sectors of technology whose impact on the long-established field of histopathology is quickly being realized. The development of increasing numbers of algorithms, peering ever deeper into the histopathological space, has demonstrated to the scientific community that AI pathology platforms are now poised to truly impact the future of precision and personalized medicine. However, as with all great technological advances, there are implementation and adoption challenges. This review aims to define common and relevant AI and ML terminology, describe data generation and interpretation, outline current and potential future business cases, discuss validation and regulatory hurdles, and most importantly, propose how overcoming the challenges of this burgeoning technology may shape toxicologic pathology for years to come, enabling pathologists to contribute even more effectively to answering scientific questions and solving global health issues. *This article is a product of a Special Interest Group of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology (STP). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies, positions, or opinions of the STP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pathology, a fundamental discipline that bridges basic scientific discovery to the clinic, is integral to successful drug development. Intrinsically multimodal and multidimensional, anatomic pathology continues to be empowered by advancements in molecular and digital technologies enabling the spatial tissue detection of biomolecules such as genes, transcripts, and proteins. Over the past two decades, breakthroughs in spatial molecular biology technologies and advancements in automation and digitization of laboratory processes have enabled the implementation of higher throughput assays and the generation of extensive molecular data sets from tissue sections in biopharmaceutical research and development research units. It is our goal to provide readers with some rationale, advice, and ideas to help establish a modern molecular pathology laboratory to meet the emerging needs of biopharmaceutical research. This manuscript provides (1) a high-level overview of the current state and future vision for excellence in research pathology practice and (2) shared perspectives on how to optimally leverage the expertise of discovery, toxicologic, and translational pathologists to provide effective spatial, molecular, and digital pathology data to support modern drug discovery. It captures insights from the experiences, challenges, and solutions from pathology laboratories of various biopharmaceutical organizations, including their approaches to troubleshooting and adopting new technologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peripheral nerves are routinely examined microscopically during the nonclinical safety assessment of therapeutics. In addition to test article-related on- or off-target changes, microscopic changes in peripheral nerves may also be caused by study procedures, such as parenteral test article administration and blood or tissue sampling. We present 2 nonclinical case studies in which nonstandard peripheral nerves had study procedure-related histologic changes. The first case study describes mouse trigeminal nerve changes as a result of blood sampling via retro-orbital sinus puncture. These changes included minimal-to-mild nerve fiber (axonal) degeneration associated with macrophage infiltration. The second case study presents rat brachial plexus changes associated with animal handling and blood sampling. Brachial plexus changes included minimal-to-moderate inflammation, focal hemorrhage, and nerve fiber degeneration. In both cases, the histological changes were morphologically indistinguishable from those that might be due to test article. Therefore, careful consideration of the incidence and severity across groups and a review of study procedures to rule out handling-related nerve damage are essential before identifying a test article-related effect on peripheral nerves. Study design considerations to avoid such procedure-related changes will be discussed, as well as sampling strategies to help distinguish these from test article-related effects.