Search

Background: Cocaine was the drug of choice in 4.7 % of all recreational drug-related emergency department visits. Of these patients, 40 % present with cocaine-associated chest pain, of whom 4.7 % develop an acute coronary syndrome. The American Heart Association recommends a 12-hour observation period for these patients., Objective: This study primarily aimed to ascertain whether the European Society of Cardiology non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction guidelines can be safely applied to rule-out acute coronary syndrome in low-risk patients with cocaine-associated chest pain., Methods: For this prospective observational cohort study, patients, aged 18-45 years old, who presented with cocaine-associated chest pain and were risk stratified as low risk according to the European Society of Cardiology non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction guidelines and therefore discharged home without prolonged observation period, were included. They were followed to assess major adverse cardiac events four weeks after presentation to the emergency department or chest pain unit. Cocaine use was confirmed with urine toxicology screening., Results: A total of 107 patients were included and analysed. The accuracy of the self-reported history of recent cocaine use was 94 %. Post-discharge cocaine use persisted among 32 % of patients. None of the included 107 patients died and major adverse cardiac event within four weeks did not occur among 97 patients with available data regarding MACE., Conclusion: Ruling out an acute coronary syndrome using the European Society of Cardiology non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction guidelines is likely to be safe for patients with cocaine-associated chest pain, however this study was underpowered to reach definitive conclusions., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Cocaine use is a well-established risk factor for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) although other recreational drugs (RD), are increasingly considered as potential cardiac risk factors. Compared to ACS without RD use, worse outcomes have been described for RD-associated ACS., Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the use of RD in a contemporary cohort of young ACS patients., Methods: Between June 2016 and October 2019, ACS patients aged 18-50 years, admitted to OLVG Hospital in Amsterdam, were retrospectively analysed. Medical chart review was performed to obtain patient and clinical characteristics, RD use, cardiac risk factors, outcome and follow up., Results: A total of 229 patients were included in the study. Recreational drug use prior to ACS was present in 24.9% of all patients, with cannabis (16.2%), cocaine (4.8%), or both (2.6%) most commonly observed. RD users were predominantly young men (87.7%) and had a significantly higher tobacco use compared to non-RD users (89.5% vs. 62.8%, P < 0.001), also after adjusting for age and sex. RD use was associated with larger myocardial infarctions with significantly higher CK-MB levels (104 ± 116 U/L vs 62 ± 96, P = 0.040) and poorer left ventricular function measured by echocardiography as compared to non-users (P = 0.007)., Conclusion: Recreational drug use was present in almost 25% of all young ACS patients evaluated for drug use and was associated with larger myocardial infarction resulting in poorer left ventricular function as compared to non-users. Additionally, RD-users were younger and were more often tobacco users, compared to non-users., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Introduction: Cocaine is considered a cardiovascular risk factor, yet it is not included in the frequently used risk stratification scores. Moreover, many guidelines provide limited advice on how to diagnose and treat cocaine-associated chest pain (CACP). This study aimed to determine the current practice for CACP patients in emergency departments and coronary care units throughout the Netherlands., Methods: An anonymous online questionnaire-based survey was conducted among Dutch emergency physicians and cardiologists between July 2015 and February 2016. The questionnaire was based on the American Heart Association CACP treatment algorithm., Results: A total of 214 subjects were enrolled and completed the questionnaire. All responders considered cocaine use a risk factor for developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS), nevertheless 74.4 % of emergency physicians and 81.1 % of cardiologists do not always question chest pain patients about drug use. Of all responders, 73.6 % never perform toxicology screening. Most responders (60 %) observe patients with CACP according to the European Society of Cardiology ACS guideline, and 24.3 % give these patients ß-blockers., Conclusion: The current practice for CACP patients in most emergency departments and coronary care units in the Netherlands is not in line with the AHA scientific statement. Emergency physicians and cardiologists should be advised to routinely question all chest pain patients on drug history and be aware that the risk stratifications scores are not validated for CACP. Despite the AHA scientific statement of 2008, many respondents utilize ß-blockers for CACP patients, which is supported by published evidence since the statement appeared., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2020 The Author(s).)