Perioperative hemorrhage necessitating red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is an undesirable surgical complication, as RBC transfusion has consistently been associated with adverse patient outcomes.1–7 In addition, the economic toll of transfusion is increasingly well recognized, with nearly 3 million units of RBCs transfused perioperatively each year in the United States, representing more than $2.25 billion.8,9 Furthermore, hospital blood supplies are limited with more than one-quarter of US hospitals reporting surgical delays due to insufficient blood supplies and 10% of hospitals reporting at least 1 day per year where surgical blood needs cannot be met.8 It is therefore imperative in this era of increased scrutiny on health care quality that transfusion practices be uniquely tailored to clinical scenarios in which transfusion may provide evidence-based improvement in patient outcome. Preoperative platelet (PLT) counts and coagulation tests have long been used as a marker of perioperative bleeding risk; however, the value of this practice remains unclear.10 Prior studies have shown that routine preoperative coagulation tests, including PLT counts, do not reliably predict surgical bleeding complications,11–15 prompting the 2012 American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation to recommend against this practice unless clearly indicated by patient history and physical examination.16 However, recent evidence suggests that pre-operative thrombocytopenia is associated with significantly higher risk of blood transfusion and death in noncardiac surgery, prompting the authors to question recommendations against routine preoperative screening.17 In clinical practice, administration of PLTs in those with thrombocytopenia is frequently performed in the preoperative period in an attempt to mitigate perioperative bleeding complications including RBC requirements, surgical blood loss, and reoperation for bleeding. However, evidence to support or guide such perioperative transfusion practices is lacking.18 As such, the decision to transfuse in the perioperative period is often based on the gestalt or clinical experience of the surgeon or anesthesiologist rather than by quality evidence suggesting benefit. Moreover, PLT transfusions are associated with substantial patient risk, including a myriad of allergic, infectious, and inflammatory transfusion reactions.19,20 This investigation was designed to determine the relationship between preoperative PLT transfusion and perioperative bleeding complications in patients with thrombocytopenia undergoing noncardiac surgery in a large, tertiary care center. We hypothesized that while preoperative thrombocytopenia (i.e., PLT count ≤ 100 × 109/L) would be predictive of perioperative RBC requirements, prophylactic PLT administration would not attenuate this risk. In addition, we aimed to assess the impact of preoperative PLT transfusion on other patient-important outcomes.