Search

Background: Laboratory results can be affected by sample to sample carryover. Carryover of different analytes occurring in automated clinical chemistry, immunology, hematology, and molecular laboratories is well described. However, carryover in a transfusion service laboratory is not reported in medical literature., Materials and Methods: Immunohematology testing results, demographic data, and clinical data were reviewed on three patients retrospectively from 2015 to 2019., Results: Type and screen samples tested on automated gel platform from two D+ patients were affected by anti-D carryover from a patient sample with a very high-titer anti-D. Additional immunohematology and molecular testing confirmed that anti-D in samples of two D+ patients was due to carryover., Conclusion: A case of anti-D carryover caused false detection of anti-D in two D+ patients. Carryover can have implications for patient management. Transfusion laboratory staff need to be aware of it and investigate any unexpected results further., (© 2021 AABB.)

Introduction: Widely varying rates of alloimmunization associated with transfusing uncrossmatched RBC products to trauma patients as part of hemostatic resuscitation have been reported. We characterized the rates of RBC alloimmunization in our severely injured Rh(D) negative trauma population who received uncrossmatched Rh(D) positive RBC products., Methods: In a 10-year retrospective analysis to assess Rh(D) alloimmunization risks, Rh(D) negative adult trauma patients initially requiring uncrossmatched group O Rh(D) positive RBC products with either RBC units or low titer group O whole blood as part of massive transfusion protocol (MTP) activation were identified. Only those Rh(D) negative patients whose initial antibody screenings were negative were included. Duration of serologic follow-up from date of MTP activation to either date of anti-D detection or most recent negative antibody screening was calculated., Results: There were 129 eligible Rh(D) negative trauma patients identified. Median injury severity score was 25. Anti-D was detected in 10 (7.8%) patients after a median of 161.5 days; the median duration of serologic follow-up in those who did not have anti-D detected was 220 days. Patients who had anti-D detected were less severely injured and received fewer Rh(D) positive RBC products versus those who did not., Discussion: In our severely injured adult trauma patients with MTP activation requiring uncrossmatched group O Rh(D) positive RBC products, the rate of anti-D detection was low. Additional studies are necessary to determine generalizability of these findings and fully characterize alloimmunization risks in trauma patients with varying extents of injury., (© 2021 AABB.)

Disparities are prevalent in numerous areas of healthcare. We sought to investigate whether there were racial/ethnic disparities among pregnant women with the most severe form of alloimmunization who require intrauterine transfusions (IUT). We reviewed patients who underwent IUT for alloimmunization at a single fetal treatment center between 2015 and 2020. This "IUT cohort" was compared to an "Alloimmunization cohort": patients seen at our institution with a diagnosis of alloimmunization during pregnancy, who did not receive IUT. We collected maternal demographics including self-identified race/ethnicity and primary language, transfusion, and antibody characteristics. The cohorts were compared using unpaired t-tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and Fischer's exact tests, as appropriate. The IUT cohort included 43 patients and the alloimmunization cohort included 1049 patients. Compared to the alloimmunization cohort, there were significantly more patients of Latina descent in the IUT cohort (23.3% vs. 3.4%, p < .0001), and more non-English speakers (18.6% vs. 4.6%, p = .001). Twenty-one percent (9/43) of patients had immigrated to the United States, all of whom had pregnancies or miscarriages in their country of origin. A third of patients had new antibodies identified on serial screens during the current pregnancy. Significantly more women of Latina ethnicity and non-English speakers required IUTs compared to the cohort of women with alloimmunization. Insufficient access to care prior to arriving in the United States and among racial and ethnic minorities in the United States may contribute to these findings. Providers should be cognizant of potential, racial, and ethnic inequalities among women receiving intrauterine transfusions., (© 2021 AABB.)

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is a severe form of anemia caused by maternal antibodies against fetal red blood cells (RBC) that can cause intrauterine and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The prevalence and specificities of alloantibodies among Israeli pregnant women and clinical outcomes for their fetuses and newborns are unknown., Study Design and Methods: A retrospective study of women who gave birth between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011, was performed. Data were obtained for obstetric admissions from 16 of 27 hospitals, which included results of maternal ABO, D, antibody screens, antibody identification, and requirements for intrauterine or newborn exchange transfusions., Results: Data on 90 948 women representing 70% of all births during 2011 were analyzed. Antibody screen was positive in 5245 (5.8%) women. Alloantibodies, excluding anti-D titer (<16) were identified in 900 (1.0%) women. Of 191 D- women, 75 (39.3%) had anti-D titer of 16 or greater. Other common clinically significant antibodies were anti-E (204, 23%), anti-K (145, 16%), and anti-c (97, 10.8%) alone or in antibody combinations. Multiple alloantibodies were observed in 132 of 900 (15%) of women. Severe HDFN developed in 6.8% (9/132) of these pregnancies. Seventeen fetuses and newborns (0.02% of births) including one set of twins required RBC transfusions. Two fetuses whose mothers had multiple alloantibodies received intrauterine transfusions; one of them was hydropic and died., Conclusion: The prevalence of RBC alloantibodies was 1.0% among Israeli pregnant women. Transfusion was required in 0.02% of the fetuses and newborns. Severe HDFN developed in 6.8% of pregnancies with multiple maternal alloantibodies., (© 2020 AABB.)

Background: Rhesus D (RhD) incompatibility is still the most important cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, causes, and consequences of anti-D alloimmunizations in pregnancy in Iceland, prior to implementation of targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) in 2018., Study Design and Methods: This was a nation-wide cohort study of 130 pregnancies affected by RhD alloimmunization in Iceland in the period from 1996 through 2015. Data were collected from transfusion medicine databases, medical records, and the Icelandic Medical Birth Register., Results: Of 130 RhD alloimmunizations, 80 cases (61.5%) represented new RhD immunization in the current pregnancy. Sensitization was discovered in the third trimester in 41 (51.3%) and occurred in the first pregnancy in 14 cases (17.5%). The most likely causative immunization event was the index pregnancy for 45 (56.25%), a previous pregnancy/birth for 26 (32.5%), abortion for 3 (3.75%), and unknown for 6 women (7.5%). Higher anti-D titers were associated with shorter gestational length, cesarean sections, positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT), and severe HDFN. Intrauterine transfusion (IUT) was performed in five pregnancies (3.8%), and 35 of 132 (26.5%) live-born neonates received treatment for HDFN; 32 received phototherapy (24.2%), 13 exchange transfusion (9.8%), and seven simple blood transfusion (5.3%)., Conclusion: In about half of cases, RhD alloimmunization was caused by the index pregnancy and discovered in the third trimester. Thus, the newly implemented RAADP protocol should be effective in reducing the incidence of RhD immunization in Iceland in the future., (© 2019 AABB.)

Background: Serologic RhD-negative blood donors are tested by a method known to detect weak D antigen expression. Serology does not detect all red blood cells with RhD expression and RHD genotyping has been used to identify variant RHD alleles, which may lead to some RhD expression. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of RHD variant alleles in serologic RhD-negative blood donors at a hospital-based donor center in Los Angeles., Study Design and Methods: RHD genotyping of serologic RhD-negative blood donors over a 20-month period was performed using the Immucor RHD BeadChip assay. DNA sequencing was performed when the RHD BeadChip assay failed to assign a genotype. For RHD variants known or suspected to result in RhD expression, recipients of previous blood donations were investigated for alloimmunization., Results: RHD genotyping was performed in 1174 RhD-negative blood donors, and 1122 were genotyped for RHCE variants. Eleven donors (0.94%) harbored mutations predicted to yield RhD expression. The predicted phenotypes were, in decreasing frequency, DEL, partial, and weak D phenotypes. Anti-D was not detected in 16 patients who had received blood from these donors after an average follow up of 182 days., Conclusion: Genotyping can be used to identify donors with the potential to sensitize RhD-negative recipients. In this limited study, 0.94% of serologic RhD-negative blood donors were found to have variant RHD alleles that might cause alloimmunization in RhD-negative recipients. To our knowledge, a study of this nature has not been reported in the United States., (© 2019 AABB.)

Background: Recent reports have indicated that the risk of anti-D alloimmunization following D-incompatible platelet (PLT) transfusion is low in hematology and oncology patients. We investigated the rate of anti-D alloimmunization in RhD-negative (D - ) patients with chronic liver disease transfused with D + platelet concentrates (PCs) and the factors involved, at a liver transplant (LT) center., Study Design and Methods: We reviewed the blood bank database from January 2003 to October 2016. D - patients who had received D + PLT transfusions were eligible if they had undergone antibody screening at least 28 days after the first D + PC transfusion, had no previous or concomitant exposure to D + blood products, and had not received anti-D immunoglobulins., Results: Six of the 56 eligible patients (10.7%) had anti-D antibodies. All had received whole blood-derived PCs. Four of 20 patients (20%) untransplanted or transfused before LT and only two of 36 patients (5.6%) transfused during or after LT produced anti-D antibodies. These two patients were on maintenance immunosuppression based on low-dose steroids and tacrolimus. The factors identified as significantly associated with anti-D immune response were the presence of red blood cell immune alloantibodies before D + PLT transfusion (p = 0.003), and D + PLT transfusion outside the operative and postoperative (5 days) periods for LT (p = 0.023)., Conclusion: D - patients with chronic liver disease transfused with D + PLTs before LT are at high risk of developing anti-D antibodies. Preventive measures should be considered for these patients., (© 2019 AABB.)

Background: D antigens are not taken into account in the allocation of solid organs. Female transplant recipients with D antibodies as a consequence of D-mismatched kidney transplantation may develop hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in future pregnancies. We examined D antibody development in transplant recipients who received D-mismatched kidney transplantation in absence of D prophylaxis and in a setting of reduced immunosuppression., Study Design and Methods: From 1993 until 2015, a total of 1355 kidney patients received transplantations in our center of whom 156 received a D-mismatched graft. A retrospective analysis was conducted; frozen stored sera obtained from transplant recipients 3 months after transplantation were tested for irregular red blood cell (RBC) antibodies using a three-cell screening and an identification panel. In the case of D antibody positivity, additional testing was performed 1 month before transplantation., Results: In seven of 156 (4.5%) transplant recipients we found irregular RBC antibodies after transplantation, of which five (3.2%) were determined to be D antibodies. We observed only one (0.6%) recipient without D antibodies before transplantation., Conclusion: Although the risk of D antibody development is considerably lower after D-mismatched kidney transplantation than D-mismatched pregnancy, anti-D prophylaxis may still be advisable for female transplant recipients of childbearing age., (© 2017 AABB.)

Background: Red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization during pregnancy is still a major problem. Historically, anti-D antibodies are most likely to cause severe hemolysis, but other antibodies are also important. In Iceland, postnatal RhIg prophylaxis was implemented in 1969, universal RBC antibody screening was implemented in 1978, but antenatal RhIg prophylaxis is not yet routine., Study Design and Methods: This nation-wide population study gathered data on alloimmunized pregnancies in Iceland between 1996 and 2015. Blood bank alloimmunization data were linked to Icelandic Medical Birth Registry data. RBC antibodies were classified as either clinically significant or clinically nonsignificant., Results: In total, 912 positive antibody screens from 87,437 births were identified (1.04% prevalence). The most frequent antibodies were anti-M (19.4%), anti-E (19.0%), and anti-D (12.5%). Anti-D prevalence among D-negative mothers was 1.1%. Icelandic Medical Birth Registry data were available for 881 (96.6%) pregnancies. In the clinically significant group (n = 474), anti-E (27%) and anti-D (20%) were most common, whereas anti-M was most frequent (53%) in the clinically nonsignificant group (n = 407). Mothers in the clinically significant group were older, more often multigravidae, had more abortions and stillbirths, and had shorter gestational length. Newborns in the clinically significant group were less healthy, had lower weight and Apgar scores, and required more treatment. Among specificities in the clinically significant group, anti-D antibodies were most strongly associated with severe hemolysis., Conclusion: In this study, the prevalence of alloimmunization was similar to that in previous reports. Of all clinically significant antibodies, anti-D was most strongly associated with severe hemolysis, requiring phototherapy or exchange transfusions. Our data emphasize the importance of implementing an antenatal prophylactic RhIg program in Iceland in the near future., (© 2017 AABB.)

Background: In low-resource countries, screening for D antibodies to detect pregnancies at risk for hemolytic disease of the newborn is not routine practice. Retrospective data showed that 5.5% of Surinamese newborns of D-negative women had a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT), indicating the presence of maternal antibodies against fetal antigens. Here, the frequency and clinical relevance of DAT positivity is evaluated., Study Design and Methods: Between April 2015 and June 2016, an observational, multicenter cohort study was undertaken among Surinamese newborns born to D-negative women. In newborns, the DAT was performed, and clinical outcomes between DAT-negative and DAT-positive newborns were compared., Results: Of the 232 evaluable newborns, 19 (8.2%) had a positive DAT, of which 11 of 15 antibody-tested newborns had D antibodies. DAT-positive newborns had lower hemoglobin levels (p = 0.02) and a trend toward higher bilirubin concentrations (p = 0.09) in the first days of life compared with DAT-negative newborns. DAT-positive newborns were admitted more frequently (p = 0.02), needed phototherapy treatment almost four times as often as DAT-negative newborns (26% vs. 7%; p = 0.008), and therapy took 2 days longer (p = 0.01). Exchange transfusions were performed in two newborns with D antibodies, both complicated with sepsis. The hospital stay was 2.5 days longer for DAT-positive newborns (p = 0.007). Overall, the prevalence of hemolytic disease of the newborn requiring treatment was 2.2% among the whole cohort of newborns., Conclusion: We found a high prevalence of DAT positivity with substantial need for hyperbilirubinemia treatment in newborns in Suriname. These results stress the necessity for better management procedures in D-negative women., (© 2017 AABB.)

Background: Maternal antibodies against the D antigen are the most common cause of severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). In high-income countries, the risk of D immunization has been reduced by routine antenatal and postpartum administration of RhIG from 13% to less than 0.5%. In less-resourced countries, such as Suriname, red blood cell (RBC) antibody screening during pregnancy and prophylactic RhIG administration are not routine. Accurate data on D immunization risk is not available. In the RheSuN (Rhesus Surinamese Neonates) study, the prevalence and the hemolytic potential of maternal D antibodies were investigated., Study Design and Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional study in four major hospitals in Paramaribo, Suriname, covering 90% of approximately 10,000 births yearly in Suriname. Included were D- pregnant women of various ethnicities seeking routine prenatal care and/or their newborns., Results: D antibodies were detected in 19 of 214 D- pregnancies (8.9%; 95% confidence interval, 5.1%-12.7%), in 2.0% of primigravid and 11.7% of multigravid women. The direct antiglobulin test was positive in 11 of 13 tested D+ newborns. Determination of D antibody titers and antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay revealed three newborns at high risk for HDFN (ADCC > 50%)., Conclusion: D immunization risk in Suriname women is comparable to the pre-anti-D prophylaxis era in high-income countries. Recommended is free-of-charge routine RBC antibody screening and prophylactic RhIG administration for women at risk for D antibody formation as part of standard of ante- and postnatal care., (© 2017 AABB.)

Background: Immunosuppressed, RhD-negative oncology patients tend to have lower rates of sensitization to the D antigen when they receive transfusion with RhD-positive blood components. Clinical factors associated with alloimmunization to the D antigen in RhD-negative oncology patients when they receive transfusion with RhD-positive red blood cells (RBCs) have not been well defined., Study Design and Methods: This was a 4-year, retrospective analysis identifying RhD-negative oncology patients who received RhD-positive RBCs and were not previously alloimmunized to the D antigen. Age, sex, race, ABO group, primary oncology diagnosis, and numbers of RhD-incompatible RBC transfusions were recorded. The association between antibody formation and clinical factors was studied. The incidence of alloanti-D was calculated from a subsequent antibody-detection test performed at least 28 days after receipt of the first transfusion of RhD-positive RBCs., Results: In total, 545 RhD-negative oncology patients received 4295 RhD-positive RBC transfusions. Of these, 76 (14%) became alloimmunized to the D antigen. Diagnosis type was the only factor significantly associated with responder status. The logistic regression model indicated that patients who had myelodysplastic syndrome or solid malignancies were more likely to be responders than those who had acute leukemia., Conclusion: We measured a 14% sensitization rate to the D antigen in our RhD-negative oncology population. The rate of alloimmunization was higher in patients who had solid cancers (22.6%) or myelodysplastic syndrome (23%) compared with those who had other hematologic malignancies (7%). Knowledge of diagnoses that predispose to RhD alloimmunization enables better utilization of RhD-negative RBCs during times of shortage., (© 2016 AABB.)

Background: RhIG has had great success in protecting fetuses from potential harm; however, little work has been done to demonstrate how long RhIG reactivity is detected in the mother after administration when using common red blood cell antibody detection methods., Study Design and Methods: A retrospective investigation was performed examining positive antibody identification panels due to RhIG. These panels were run on solid-phase (SP) testing. The time to a positive result, length of detection, and positive strength of reactivity (PSR) were evaluated. Additionally, a comparative study was performed evaluating how sensitive SP, gel (GT), and tube testing (TT) were at detecting RhIG using serially diluted plasma samples spiked with different RhIG formulas., Results: Retrospectively, most antibody identification panels by SP were positive 3.5 months after RhIG administration and demonstrated a strong PSR. The longest recorded positive panel was present at 4.5 months. RhIG administered intramuscularly could not be detected until several hours after injection. The comparative study showed that SP was the most sensitive method while GT and TT were comparable to one another in detecting RhIG. SP also recorded strong PSR at very low concentrations of RhIG. GT and TT recorded weak PSR even with higher concentrations of RhIG., Conclusion: SP is the most sensitive testing method and has the ability to detect RhIG 4 to 5 months after administration. TT and GT have the ability to detect RhIG up to 3 to 4 months after administration. Different RhIG formulas may show slightly different lengths of detection., (© 2015 AABB.)

Background: The objective was to determine clinical consequences of various specificities for the infant/fetus. The population was patients referred between 1998 and 2005 to the tertiary center because of detected red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization. Altogether 455 infants were delivered by 390 alloimmunized women., Study Design and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Data were obtained from the blood bank register and the obstetric and neonatal database. As indicators of hemolytic activity of the antibodies, the frequency of the therapeutic interventions intrauterine transfusion, exchange transfusion, and simple transfusion was used., Results: Anti-D was the most common antibody (46.6%), followed by anti-K (15.4%). A combination of antibodies was detected in 27%. All three types of therapeutic intervention were significantly more frequent in women with anti-D plus an additional antibody than in women with anti-D as the sole antibody. The anti-D titer closely paralleled the clinical importance of the antibody. One case of anti-s with a titer of 512 required all three types of transfusion., Conclusions: Anti-D was the single most frequent and harmful specificity closely followed by anti-K. Combinations of antibody specificities were more harmful than single specificities, and a potentially synergistic effect should be considered.

Background: Aberrant RHD alleles leading to a reduced expression of D antigen on the red blood cell (RBC) surface may be mistyped as D- by serology. To quantify the occurrence of weak D, DEL, and D+/- chimera among apparent D- first-time blood donors, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) screening was implemented as a routine service., Study Design and Methods: A total of 23,330 pretyped D- samples were tested for RHD markers in Exons 4, 7, and 10 in pools of 20 by PCR. Samples with positive results in PCR were reevaluated by exon-specific PCRs, DNA sequencing, and serologic methods., Results: Among 94 PCR-positive samples, 74 exhibited a weak D or DEL phenotype, dubbed weak D type 1, weak D type 2, weak D type 5, weak D type 32, weak D type 4.3, RHD(M295I), RHD(del147), and RHD(1227G>A). The most prevalent alleles were weak D type 4.3 (n = 31) and RHD(IVS3+1G>A) (n = 24)., Conclusions: As a clinical consequence, 74 blood donor samples carrying weak D and DEL phenotypes with the potential of causing secondary immunizations in recipients were reclassified as D+. Those samples were reliably amplified by RHD Exon 7 PCR; therefore, its usage in the Upper Austrian population is recommended. The association of the weak D type 4.3 samples with a ce leads to the policy that all apparently D- donors should be tested with genotyping methods; otherwise, potentially immunogenic RHD alleles may be overseen.

Background: The objective was the evaluation of the effect of the Dutch national routine antenatal RhIG (anti-D) immunization prevention (RAADP) program comprising one single dose of 200 microg (1000 IU) of RhIG in the 30th week of pregnancy, restricted to women without a living child., Study Design and Methods: A nationwide historic control study was performed. All newly detected anti-D-immunized para-1 in 1999, 2002, and 2004 were included and classified on the basis of received prophylaxis during the first pregnancy: antenatal and postnatal versus only postnatal RhIG. The numbers of D- parae-1 who delivered a D+ first child before the introduction (control group) or after the introduction (intervention group) of the RAADP were calculated from Vital Birth Statistics (8,700 and 12,000, respectively)., Results: Fifty-eight newly detected anti-D immunizations in the first trimester were observed in the control group and 39 in the intervention group, which resulted in a significant reduction of the prevalence of new anti-D immunizations from 0.67 percent (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50%-0.84%) to 0.31 percent (95% CI, 0.21%-0.41%). No reduction was observed in anti-D immunizations newly detected at the 30th-week screening (0.25%). A nonsignificant risk reduction of the risk of severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) was found (0.23% vs. 0.10%). The numbers needed to treat to prevent one anti-D-immunized pregnancy and one case of subsequent severe HDFN were 357 and 1255, respectively., Conclusions: RAADP of one single dose of 200 microg of RhIG in addition to postnatal RhIG (200 microg) halves the risk of anti-D immunization and subsequent severe HDFN.

Background: The severity of hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) due to Diego(b) (Di(b)) mismatch ranges from no symptoms to severe jaundice that requires exchange transfusion (ET). The clinical significance of anti-Di(b) is incompletely recognized., Case Report: A male newborn, referred with jaundice, was revealed to have HDN due to Di(b) mismatch and was treated successfully with phototherapy and high-dose intravenous gamma globulin (IVGG)., Study Design and Methods: The literature of HDN caused by Di(b) mismatch was reviewed. The cases were classified into three groups according to their severity: the mildest needed no therapy (NO), the moderate group received phototherapy alone (PHOTO), and the most severe was treated with ET and/or high-dose IVGG therapy plus phototherapy (ET/IVGG)., Results: Among 27 cases of HDN due to Di(b) reported to date, 10, 6, and 11 cases required NO, PHOTO, and ET/IVGG, respectively. A significant correlation (p < 0.01) was found between the maternal anti-Di(b) titer and the severity of the disease when the ET/IVGG group was compared with the NO group. All mothers of the group that needed ET/IVGG had an anti-Di(b) titer of 64 or greater., Conclusion: A maternal high titer (> or =64) of anti-Di(b) is associated with a higher risk of severe hyperbilirubinemia for mismatched newborns.

Background: Current recommendations for anti-D prophylaxis for women who deliver a D+ offspring vary from country to country, and the introduction of new reagents require pharmacokinetic studies that show serum levels after the injection. Serum levels of anti-D may depend on the maternal body mass index (BMI)., Study Design and Methods: Serum concentrations of total anti-D IgG and IgG1-4 subclasses were determined by flow cytometry in 26 D- women, who had received prophylaxis after delivery of a D+ offspring. Blood samples were drawn on Days 1, 2, 3, and 14 after injection, and the BMI was recorded., Results: Anti-D levels increased continuously in all women during the first 3 days. The increase was significantly affected by the BMI if higher than 27 kg per m2 (p<0.001). The higher the BMI, the less was the increase of serum anti-D. Mean peak levels 72 hours after injection was 89 ng per mL in lean women, but estimated levels were 28 to 60 percent lower in women with a BMI of 28 to 40 kg per m2. The effect of a BMI higher than 27 kg per m2 on anti-D was not gradual but progressive. Similarly, the BMI affected serum concentrations of anti-D subclasses IgG1-4 (p<0.001)., Conclusion: The BMI needs consideration for the adjustment of the dosage of anti-D, provided its bioavailability to suppress alloimmunization is reflected by measurable amounts in the serum.

Background: Anti-D IgG antibodies that are responsible for severe cases of HDN belong chiefly to IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses. The relationship between the concentrations of IgG1 anti-D and IgG3 anti-D in maternal serum and the amount bound to the surface of infants' RBCs is not known. In addition, the contribution of the two subclasses to the severity of HDN is not well established., Study Design and Methods: Blood samples from 40 infants suffering from severe forms of HDN due to anti-D were collected before transfusion together with sera from their respective mother. The amount of total anti-D IgG as well as IgG1 anti-D and IgG3 anti-D on infants' RBCs and the concentration in maternal sera were determined by ELISA., Results: The median percentages of IgG1 anti-D and of IgG3 anti-D in maternal sera were 90 and 10 percent, respectively, whereas on infants' RBCs they were 97 and 3 percent, respectively. The differences between maternal and infantile percentages were significant (p < 0.001). IgG1 and IgG3 anti-D bound to infants' RBCs increased concomitantly with the concentration of IgG1 and IgG3 anti-D in maternal sera. The severity of HDN correlated positively with the concentration of IgG1 anti-D in maternal sera, but negatively with the amount of IgG3 anti-D bound to infants' RBCs. In addition, the existence of a high proportion of IgG3 anti-D in maternal serum was associated with a delayed risk of fetal anemia., Conclusion: The proportion of IgG3 anti-D relative to the total anti-D IgG on infants' RBCs is only one- third of the proportion present in maternal serum. The study of the correlations between the amount of IgG1 anti-D and IgG3 anti-D and the severity of HDN suggests that IgG1 anti-D are more important than IgG3 anti-D in the pathogenesis of fetal anemia.

Background: Invasive procedures to obtain fetal DNA for prenatal blood grouping present a risk to the fetus. During pregnancy, cell-free fetal DNA is present in maternal blood. The detection of RHD sequences in maternal plasma has been used to predict fetal D status, based on the assumption that RHD is absent in D- genomes., Study Design and Methods: Real-time PCR assays were designed to distinguish RHD from RHDpsi (possessed by the majority of D- black Africans). Plasma-derived DNA from 137 D- women was subjected to real-time PCR to detect fetal RHD and Y chromosome-associated SRY sequences. The accuracy of RHD genotyping from maternal plasma was investigated by comparing results with those obtained by conventional RHD genotyping from fetal tissue or serologic tests on the infant's RBCs. The quantity of fetal DNA in maternal plasma was investigated in 94 pregnancies., Results: Fetal D status was predicted with 100-percent accuracy from maternal plasma. The number of copies of fetal DNA in maternal plasma was found to increase with gestation., Conclusion: Combination of the sensitivity of real-time PCR with an improved RHD typing assay to distinguish RHD from RHDpsi enables highly accurate prediction of fetal D status from maternal plasma. This has resulted in the implementation of a clinical noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping service.

Background: Accurate and reliable measurement of the volume of fetal D+ cells in D- women is required for adequate anti-D prophylaxis. A semiautomated flow cytometry assay based on a standardized calibration curve that was created with simulated fetomatemal hemorrhage (FMH) mixtures was developed., Study Design and Methods: A calibration range of 0.083- to 2-percent D+ cells in the D-RBC mixtures (2-44 mL calculated FMH) was analyzed by use of a flow cytometer (XL-MCL, Coulter Electronics Ltd). Linear regression analysis of the calibration curve data with computer software (Excel, Microsoft) allowed semiautomated determination of the FMH volume. To optimize the assay, fresh versus frozen and thawed RBCs, RBCs from adults who are heterozygous for D or cord RBCs, and indirect- or direct-labeling techniques were evaluated by use of MoAbs., Results: Fresh RBCs from adults heterozygous for D were chosen for routine use, although equivalent calibration curves were obtained with all cells tested (n = 12 calibration assays; r2 = 0.999; mean SD, 14%). A monoclonal anti-D reagent (Therad 10, Diagnostics Scotland) worked well in both indirect-(anti-IgG F(ab)-FITC) and direct-(anti-D-FITC) labeling methods compared to the use of BRAD-3 FITC. In routine practice, the FMH volumes obtained were mainly lower than those obtained in the Kleihauer Betke test when there was less than 4 mL of FMH., Conclusion: Semiautomated data acquisition and calibration curve analysis represents a further step toward standardization of flow cytometry for accurate FMH quantification and facilitates evaluation and control of day-to-day variations between laboratories, flow cytometers, and operators.

Background: Passively acquired blood group alloantibodies are detected regularly after infusions of IV Rh immune globulin (RhIG) for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in D+ patients., Study Design and Methods: Blood samples from 16 D+ patients with ITP were tested after treatment with IV RhIG for the presence of passively acquired alloantibodies. Similar studies were conducted for three D- patients after injections of IM RhIG for Rh immunoprophyl-axis. Four production lots of IV RhIG and 2 lots of IM RhIG were tested for the presence of alloantibodies., Results: All 16 D+ patients with ITP developed a positive DAT, as well as positive antibody detection test results, after infusions of IV RhIG. All postinfusion plasma samples contained anti-D, as well as one or more additional antibodies, usually anti-C, -E, -G, -V, or -Fy(a). Eluates from patients' RBCs with positive DAT results contained multiple passively acquired alloantibodies. Multiple alloantibodies were detected in samples of different production lots of IV RhIG or IM RhIG. No acute transfusion reactions were observed in five D+ patients with ITP who had been treated with IV RhIG and had been given serologically incompatible D+ RBCs. After injections of IM RhIG, the only passively acquired alloantibody detected was anti-D., Conclusion: Plasma samples from D+ patients with ITP treated with IV RhIG regularly contained anti-D and multiple other passively acquired Rh, Duffy, or Kidd system alloantibodies. Postinfusion RBC samples all had positive DAT results with eluates containing anti-D and multiple other Rh, Duffy, or Kidd system antibodies. The consistent detection of multiple passively acquired alloantibodies after IV RhIG, in contrast to the detection of anti-D only after IM RhIG, reflects the immediate effect of the entire (bolus) dose of RhIG by the IV route, the dose for treating ITP that is approximately 10 times the dose for Rh immunoprophylaxis, and the expected serologic incompatibility with recipients' D+ RBCs.

Background: Anti-D immunoglobulin preparations are injected to prevent hemolytic disease of the newborn. The concentration of IgG anti-D in these preparations is usually determined by an automated hemagglutination technique using as a reference a calibrated preparation of anti-D, but the method requires special equipment and cannot be routinely applied to measure the IgG subclasses of anti-D in these preparations., Study Design and Methods: Taking advantage of a recently described enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the determination of the anti-D concentration in sera of alloimmunized pregnant women, IgG anti-D and IgG subclass concentrations were measured in the international reference preparation (IRP) coded 68/419, 10 anti-D immunoglobulin preparations, and sera of 15 D-immunized volunteers., Results: An IgG anti-D concentration of 61.5 +/- 4.8 microg per ampoule (mean +/- SD) was found by ELISA in IRP 68/419. This result was in agreement with previous determinations obtained by radioimmunoassay (60 microg/ampoule). The IgG subclass concentration of anti-D in this preparation was 48.4 microg of IgG1 (78.6%), 3.0 microg of IgG2 (4.8%), 9.7 microg of IgG3 (15.8%), and 0.4 microg of IgG4 (0.7%). The mean proportion of IgG subclasses of anti-D in 10 immunoglobulin preparations was similar (81.7% for IgG1, 5.0% for IgG2, 12.7% for IgG3, and 0.6% for IgG4). In the sera of 15 immunized volunteers, the IgG anti-D concentration varied from 3.1 to 68.4 microg per mL. The mean IgG subclass composition of anti-D was 79.3 percent for IgG1, 2.2 percent for IgG2, 18.1 percent for IgG3, and 0.4 percent for IgG4. The proportions of IgG3 anti-D in these sera were found to range between 1 percent and 87 percent, as in the sera of D-alloimmunized pregnant women., Conclusion: ELISA provides an alternative to the radioimmunoassay and the automated hemagglutination technique. In addition, it allows the evaluation of the absolute concentration of each IgG subclass of anti-D in immunoglobulin preparations and necessitates only the conventional equipment required for an immunoenzymatic assay.