Search

Background Blood donor experiences both immediate adverse reactions (IAR) and delayed adverse reactions (DAR). With limited published data available on the incidence of DAR, a study was conducted to estimate incidence and profile of DAR through telephonic interview. Materials and methods Study was conducted over a 45-day period for consecutive volunteer whole blood donations at tertiary care hospital. Donors were divided into first-time, repeat and regular and were monitored for IAR. They were given written copy of post-donation advice. Donors were contacted telephonically three weeks post-donation and enquired about general wellbeing and specific DAR in accordance with a standard n international (International Society of Blood Transfusion) standard format. Results Donors participated in the study of which 1.6% donors experienced an IAR. Much larger number reported DAR (10.3% vs.1.6% p < 0.0001). Further, DAR was presented as a variegated profile with bruise, painful arms and fatigue being the commonest. DARs were more common in females than males (25% vs. 10.3%, p < 0.02). Localized DAR like bruise and painful arms were more common in younger donors (age <50 years) whereas systemic DAR like fatigue was common in older donors (>50 years). First time (12.3%) and repeat donors (13.5%) had similar frequency of DAR but were lower among regular donors (6.7%). Conclusion DARs are more common than IAR and are of different profile. Post-donation interview has provided an insight into donor experiences and can be used as a valuable tool in donor hemovigilance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• 6678 donor blood samples were phenotyped to look for unusual phenotypes in Indian population. • Indigenous antibody screening panel was created with the help of phenotyped voluntary donor registry. • A rare donor with D - - phenotype was registered with the IRDP, Bristol, UK. A clinically significant red cell alloantibody is capable of accelerated destruction of red cells bearing the corresponding antigen. Knowledge of prevalence of these antigens is necessary for performing day to day work and for research in immunohematology. The primary aim of this study was to find the prevalence of 18 clinically significant blood group antigens in blood donors. Secondary objectives were to motivate and create a database of accessible, volunteer O blood group donors and to register rare donors with existing registries. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the department of Transfusion Medicine at a large tertiary care hospital in India from October 2016 to May 2018 with a planned sample size of 4800. Study population included healthy blood donors of either gender coming for blood donation to the blood centre. A total of 6678 samples were included in the study. First time donors were 21.41 % while 78.59 % were repeat donors. Voluntary donors constituted 15.81 % while replacement donors were 84.19 %. Male donors were 89.82 % while female donors were 10.18 %. The antigen, phenotype and gene frequencies were calculated. An extended phenotyped voluntary donor database was created and four rare donors were identified. One of these rare donors was registered with the International Rare Donor Panel (IRDP) and rest were registered in a local registry. This study might help enhance the confidence of blood banks in finding appropriate units for patients with unexpected antibodies or with rare phenotypes. It also paves a way for registering rare donors locally and internationally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]