Search

For assessment of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, neutralization activity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody is measured. This study was undertaken to determine optimum levels of binding antibody units (BAU/ml) in new quantitative chemiluminescent assay (CLIA) that corresponded to neutralizing potential (30% inhibition) of sVNT assay. Methods: Ninety-one blood samples were analyzed by CLIA and sVNT assays. Test samples (n = 75) were collected from blood donors post-2nd vaccination dose, while control samples (n = 16) were archived pre-COVID donor samples. Correlation between CLIA and sVNT was calculated and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn and analyzed. Results: Results indicated excellent correlation between 57.5 BAU/ml on CLIA and 30%inhibition on sVNT assay. ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.971. Discussion: The present study determined that 57.5 BAU/ml on CLIA corresponded to 30% inhibition on sVNT assay. Periodic quantitative analysis [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABO-incompatible transplantations allow patients to receive timely transplants. Isoagglutinin titration to ascertain levels of incompatible antibodies in the recipient is important in determining patient selection and transplant survivability. To find out the prevalent trends in India, the largest, first of its kind survey was carried out among the transplant centers regarding their practices in isoagglutinin titration. The survey was drafted by a working group of Transfusion and Transplant Immunology specialists from six different centers. Data was obtained via the use of an online questionnaire. Results were categorized into four categories, Hospital information, Titration methodology, Role of transfusion specialists and cut-off titers. Most centers had a well-established solid-organ transplant program with considerable number of ABO-incompatible transplantations. Most centers performed isoagglutinin titration in Transfusion Medicine department. Column Agglutination Technique (CAT) was the most common method, using EDTA blood samples and freshly-prepared in-house pooled cells. Most centers had a turn-around time of less than 12 h. While the policy for ascertaining baseline and threshold titers is well-defined in ABO-incompatible renal transplants, variations from center to center still exist for ABO-incompatible liver transplants. Most centers required a Transfusion Medicine consultation for the patients before such transplants. With increasing ABO-incompatible kidney and liver transplants across the country, the role of Transfusion medicine specialists has become vital in pre-conditioning regimes enabling the viability and success of such transplants. This was a unique survey that provided a snapshot of current trends and practices of isoagglutinin titration for ABO-incompatible transplants in India. • This was a survey undertaken among the Transplant centers across the country performing ABO incompatible transplants • Such transplants are being performed not only at larger tertiary centers in metro cities, but also in smaller hospitals across the country • The protocols for kidney transplants in regards to baseline and threshold titers appear better defined as compared to those for liver transplants • Underscores the growing importance of Transfusion Medicine as an integral part of such complex procedures [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Post-donation counselling informs donors of unusual test results. Timely notification and counselling regarding their Transfusion Transmitted Infection (TTI) status is necessary for early clinical intervention in the donor and reducing risk of transmission. We share our experience with respect to Hepatitis B (HBV) and Hepatitis C (HCV) positive donors who were counselled and followed-up for clinical outcome. Materials and methods It was prospective 2-year study in TTI positive blood donors. Confirmed positive HBV/ HCV donors were notified to attend the donor-clinic or to visit local hepatologist for further management. At donor clinic, donor’s immediate emotional response was observed; donors were offered contact-testing, associated risk factors were noted, counselled, referred to hepatologist, treated and followed-up for clinical outcome. Results Of 481 donors (0.91%) confirmed positives, 351 were contacted telephonically; 280 promised to attend donor clinic and 71 were referred to their local hepatologist. 145 donors attended the donor clinic, eventually. Most common immediate emotional response noted were ‘feeling of fear’ (55.2%) and ‘disbelief’ (35.2%). Most common associated risk factor was history of medical treatment/ injections without knowledge of sterilisation. Five donors availed contact testing and four (spouses in all four cases) came out positive. Of 98 donors contacted post-counselling; 89 went to hepatologist. No medication was advised to seven donors (low viral load), 59 donors completed treatment course and 23 donors were undergoing treatment at time of follow-up. Nine donors opted for alternative treatment or “no treatment”. Conclusion Donor-clinic proved beneficial to substantial number of donors and their families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background There are several studies on prevalence of individual infectious disease markers (mono-infection) in donors but none on prevalence of coinfection. Co-infection is significant as it leads to accelerated disease progression. We, therefore, evaluated the prevalence of co-infection among blood donors. Materials and methods The cross-sectional analysis was conducted in blood donors. All donors were tested for anti-HIV I and II, HBsAg, anti-HBC IgM, anti-HCV, Malaria and syphilis by chemiluminescence and ID-NAT assay. All reactive donor samples were confirmed by using confirmatory assays. Donors were grouped as mono-infected and co-infected. The student t -test was used for comparison. Results During the study period, a total of 106,238 blood donors were tested. Mean age of donors was 34.2 years and 94.2% of blood donors were males. 1776 (1.67%) donor samples were confirmed serologically reactive. 1714 (1.61%) samples were reactive for single marker (mono-infected) while 62 (0.05%) donors’ samples exhibited co-infection. 18 donors were positive for HBV+HCV followed by HIV +syphilis (14). Conclusion We report for the first time the prevalence of different co-infection patterns in blood donors. Co-infection influence the disease progression; it would be important to investigate the co-infection prevalence in larger sample size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Blood donor experiences both immediate adverse reactions (IAR) and delayed adverse reactions (DAR). With limited published data available on the incidence of DAR, a study was conducted to estimate incidence and profile of DAR through telephonic interview. Materials and methods Study was conducted over a 45-day period for consecutive volunteer whole blood donations at tertiary care hospital. Donors were divided into first-time, repeat and regular and were monitored for IAR. They were given written copy of post-donation advice. Donors were contacted telephonically three weeks post-donation and enquired about general wellbeing and specific DAR in accordance with a standard n international (International Society of Blood Transfusion) standard format. Results Donors participated in the study of which 1.6% donors experienced an IAR. Much larger number reported DAR (10.3% vs.1.6% p < 0.0001). Further, DAR was presented as a variegated profile with bruise, painful arms and fatigue being the commonest. DARs were more common in females than males (25% vs. 10.3%, p < 0.02). Localized DAR like bruise and painful arms were more common in younger donors (age <50 years) whereas systemic DAR like fatigue was common in older donors (>50 years). First time (12.3%) and repeat donors (13.5%) had similar frequency of DAR but were lower among regular donors (6.7%). Conclusion DARs are more common than IAR and are of different profile. Post-donation interview has provided an insight into donor experiences and can be used as a valuable tool in donor hemovigilance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background In India variable rate of “NAT yield” has been demonstrated in several published reports. This study was performed with the objective to know the rate of “true NAT yield” in blood donors by confirmation with supplementary tests and follow up of initial “NAT yield” donors. Materials and Methods A total of 48,441 blood donors were tested for HIV, HBV and HCV with enhanced chemiluminescence and ID-NAT. To know the true NAT yield status confirmation of NAT yield donors was done as with an array of serological tests, repeat ID-NAT and alternate NAT. Results The cumulative initial “NAT yield” rate was 1:4404 (11/48,441). Seven of 11 initial “NAT yields” were for hepatitis B whereas two each were in HIV and HCV. Among the 11 “NAT-yield” donors, eight donors were followed-up for confirmation. Out of these eight donors only 4 were found to be true HBV NAT yields. Out of four true NAT yields two were window period donations while the other two were occult hepatitis B infection with anti-HBcore total positive. Conclusion Our findings suggest that all “initial NAT yields” may not be “true NAT yields”. We would also like to suggest that to demonstrate the true “NAT yield” status supplementary tests and donor follow up are important to differentiate true NAT yields. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Unexpected allo-antibody identification is difficult serological test requiring in-depth knowledge of antibody behavior, identification rules, knowledge of zygosity of antigens and dosage phenomenon. Software which uses an algorithm based on characteristics of antibodies is now available to interpret specificity of allo-antibody. A study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of one such software (Resolvigen) for antibody identification compared with manual antibody identification method. Materials and Methods The study was a retrospective observational study where 238 allo-antibody results were re-evaluated using Resolvigen software (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Johnson and Johnson, Raritan, NJ, USA) and agreement between manual and software approaches was studied. Resolvigen software was also evaluated for usefulness, ease of use and predicted future usage by administering investigators a questionnaire with Likert scale. Results Agreement between the results of manual and automated methods ranged from 98.6% for single antibody to 65% for two antibodies ( p  = 0.000). Resolvigen software came out as very useful, easy to use, and with high predicted future usage. Conclusion This study concludes that Resolvigen can either replace manual method or be used as adjuvant to routine manual method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Introduction: Since there is scarce data available on incidence and type of irregular antibodies in patients and donors in India, a study was undertaken to find the incidence of irregular antibodies in patients and irregular antibodies and a positive Direct Antiglobulin Test (DAT) in blood donors. Materials and methods: Antibody screening was performed using commercial pooled “O” cells and three-cell panel for donors and patients respectively and an 11-cell panel for identification using Column Agglutination Technology (CAT) with Low-Ionic-Strength Saline–Indirect Antiglobulin Test (LISS–IAT) technique (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Johnson & Johnson, USA). The cassettes used were Anti-human Globulin (AHG) type. DAT on donors was also performed using the AHG cassettes. Results: Cumulative incidence of irregular antibodies amongst patients (n =32,560) and donors (n =31,367) were 0.12–0.009%, respectively. In patients, the commonest antibodies were from Rh system with anti-D being the most common antibody type (14/40; 35%) while in donors it was the MNS system with anti M (2/3) being the most common. Incidence of a positive DAT amongst the healthy blood donors was 0.04% (n =13/32,560). Discussion: Incidence of irregular antibodies in patients at 0.12% was slightly lower than published reports and could be because of the fact that the patient population studied comprised largely of surgical patients many of whom have never received blood transfusion. This data could also be more representative since the number of patients studied was much higher as compared to the previous Indian studies (32,560 vs. 531–2026). The report on incidence of irregular antibodies and DAT (0.009–0.04%) in blood donors was first such attempt in India. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Random Donor Platelet (RDP) derived from whole blood is the major source of platelets in India. At our centre, we prepare RDPs by buffy coat method after a holding period of 2-hours (THRDP) as per current regulatory guidelines. Overnight hold of buffy coats before RDP preparation (OHRDP) would logistically optimise the manpower usage at our centre. The aim of this study was to compare both in-vitro as well as in-vivo parameters of OHRDPs with THRDPs. Hematological (Platelet, leucocyte counts), physical (pH and Swirling) and biochemical parameters (pO2, pCO2, lactate, bicarbonate and glucose) as well as platelet activation markers were tested in THRDPs and OHRDPs each at Day-1 and Day-5 as in-vitro studies. Separately, in-vivo study was done where Corrected count increment (CCI) and percentage platelet recovery (PPR) were considered. All parameters were expressed as Mean ± Standard deviation and were analysed using paired t -test with level of significance, p < 0.05. OHRDPs had higher platelet counts and lower leucocytes and CD62 P expression than THRDPs. All other markers were well within the quality control range in both groups. No significant differences were seen in the two groups when comparing CCI and PPR. OHRDPs were found to be as good or better as compared to the THRDPs in the in-vitro part of our study. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the two groups when they were compared in vivo. This makes us conclude that overnight hold of buffy coats may be implemented at our center. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Quality assurance of single donor platelets (SDP) is incomplete unless clinical response to platelet transfusion is measured. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of SDP derived from plateletpheresis procedures and to evaluate the response to platelet transfusion. Procedures were performed on 2287 accepted donors while 271 donors were deferred. Platelet count <1.5lac/μl and hemoglobin <12.5g/dl were the leading cause of deferral. The median platelet yield in a SDP bag was found to be 3.1×1011. The median corrected count increment (CCI) and post-transfusion platelet recovery (PPR) were found to be 10110×m2/μl and 24.5%, respectively. In India, the criteria for the selection of plateletpheresis donors should be revisited. Based on quality parameters, the Fresenius COM.TEC cell separator is comparable to other cell separators. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Five years five month old male child diagnosed with aplastic anemia required blood and platelet support regularly. He was advised bone marrow transplant (BMT) and had 6/6 match with a younger sibling (11 months old). He was admitted for planned BMT and was put on preparatory regimen five days prior to BMT. GCSF-primed bone marrow (BM) harvest was done from the donor, but the harvest was insufficient (1.05 × 10^6 /kg) and target dose of 4 million stem cells per kg could not be achieved. The BM harvest was infused into the patient and a repeat BM harvest was contemplated on next day. After careful evaluation of risks and benefits to the patient and the young donor, a decision to do a peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest was taken. The apheresis kit was blood primed to preclude possible hemodynamic imbalance in the donor considering low weight and young age. The entire harvest procedure (321 minutes) was uneventful with the donor remaining stable throughout. A dose of 2.40 million per kg of CD34+ cells was harvested and infused. Thus, a total dose of 3.45 million (1.05 BM and 2.4 PBSC) per kg was infused into the patient. Neutrophil and platelet engraftments and donor chimerism were achieved successfully with tandem BM-PBSC infusion and the patient continues to be disease free till 180 days follow up. This is possibly first published Indian report on BM-PBSC tandem transplant suggesting safety of PBSC harvests in small-weight young-age donor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The biggest hurdle in renal transplantation is the ABO blood group system. But recently ABO incompatible renal transplants have been performed using plasmapheresis (PP) as a part of the preconditioning protocol. In the present study, the objective of PP along with immunosuppression was to bring down the antibody titer of the patient to ⩽16 during the transplant and keep it low, around 32, until post-operative 4–14weeks. The patient (O Negative) had his mother (B Positive) as the ABO non-identical donor. The PP was performed with an apheresis equipment Com.Tec (Fresenius Kabi, Germany) to lower the anti-B antibody titer in the recipient. An Antihuman globulin (AHG) titer was performed for anti-B antibody following the departmental standard operating procedure. A total of 11 plasmapheresis procedures was performed preoperatively and four procedures were performed post-operatively to maintain the titer of the anti-B antibody at or below the desired level. The baseline anti-B antibody titer in the recipient was 512. The baseline titer came down to 8 after the end of the 11th procedure. Post-operatively we performed four plasmapheresis procedures to keep the titer at 32. During the post-operative follow up the titer has been maintained at 32 and the serum creatinine level has been maintained at approximately 1.0mg/dl and other parameters relevant to graft function were within normal limits. Our case could be the first reported case from India in which we used a plasmapheresis procedure as a part of preconditioning protocol instead of using an immunoadsorption column. Furthermore, it could be one of the few ABOiRTx cases, which has been performed at an isoagglutinin titer of 512 using plasma exchange as part of a preconditioning regime. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

• 6678 donor blood samples were phenotyped to look for unusual phenotypes in Indian population. • Indigenous antibody screening panel was created with the help of phenotyped voluntary donor registry. • A rare donor with D - - phenotype was registered with the IRDP, Bristol, UK. A clinically significant red cell alloantibody is capable of accelerated destruction of red cells bearing the corresponding antigen. Knowledge of prevalence of these antigens is necessary for performing day to day work and for research in immunohematology. The primary aim of this study was to find the prevalence of 18 clinically significant blood group antigens in blood donors. Secondary objectives were to motivate and create a database of accessible, volunteer O blood group donors and to register rare donors with existing registries. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the department of Transfusion Medicine at a large tertiary care hospital in India from October 2016 to May 2018 with a planned sample size of 4800. Study population included healthy blood donors of either gender coming for blood donation to the blood centre. A total of 6678 samples were included in the study. First time donors were 21.41 % while 78.59 % were repeat donors. Voluntary donors constituted 15.81 % while replacement donors were 84.19 %. Male donors were 89.82 % while female donors were 10.18 %. The antigen, phenotype and gene frequencies were calculated. An extended phenotyped voluntary donor database was created and four rare donors were identified. One of these rare donors was registered with the International Rare Donor Panel (IRDP) and rest were registered in a local registry. This study might help enhance the confidence of blood banks in finding appropriate units for patients with unexpected antibodies or with rare phenotypes. It also paves a way for registering rare donors locally and internationally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]