Search

The safety of the blood supply depends on measures to protect not only the transfusion recipient but also the blood donor. Donor selection criteria have been voluntarily adopted or enforced through regulation in different countries, but review of practices in different blood centers reveals wide disparity in the current approaches. Such variability in practice suggests that the criteria for the protection of donor are often arbitrary or reflect deeply engrained precautionary practices and exposes the inherent uncertainty about the best way to minimize risk to the donor. Certain selection criteria introduced years ago have become dogma in some countries but were never subjected to systematic study and persist despite available evidence that the measures do not measurably improve donor safety. Current efforts to define a rational, evidence-based approach are crucial to eliminate practices that lead to the unnecessary deferral of large numbers of blood donors without improving the safety of the donation process. Future prospects to improve the safety of the donation process rest with hemovigilance initiatives to monitor the effectiveness of interventions to minimize the risks to blood donors. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the last 20 years, the Canadian Blood Services' (CBS) Donor Health Assessment Questionnaire (DHAQ), used to screen prospective blood donors to determine their eligibility, has grown in complexity and length. Its growth is inextricably linked to the evolution of the environment within which CBS operates from unregulated collection and distribution of labile blood products to a fully regulated environment and to the need to satisfy both Health Canada and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requirements. Within this context, the development of the CBS DHAQ has been characterized by addition of questions and items without any periodic reevaluation of the need for retaining existing questions and/or items. In this review, we apply principles from cognitive science relating to how people think when answering questionnaires to the situation of blood donors completing the DHAQ. We show that some items that were added at different times in separate questions, for reasons that were historically relevant, could be now asked more simply with a single question. The historical development of the DHAQ, resulting in the condensing of many items into lists, the use of complex wording, and the sheer number of items included in the questionnaire make accurate retrieval of information from the donor's memory difficult. Thus, we believe that redesigning the DHAQ will improve the quality and accuracy of the donors' answers to screening questions.Copyright © 2007 by Elsevier Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]