Search

Background Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) accounts for more than 10% of all cases of renal diseases leading to renal failure in children. After renal transplantation, 20% to 40% of FSGS relapse, frequently leading to renal loss.Plasmapheresis is considered the first option to treat relapses by several authors but is often ineffective. The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has been proposed as a possible treatment. Methods We reviewed the effect of rituximab in seven children or young adults with pretransplant FSGS and relapse of proteinuria after transplantation who did not respond to intensive plasmapheresis. Results After treatment, urine protein disappeared in three patients, was reduced by 70% in one patient and by 50% in one patient. No response was observed in one patient who had a quick deterioration of renal function and reached end-stage renal failure after 3 months. One additional patient developed a severe reaction a few minutes after the start of the first rituximab infusion. Conclusion Rituximab is a possible option to treat some resistant cases of FSGS with relapsing proteinuria after transplantation. It is important that therapy is started early after evidence of failure of plasmapheresis, before sclerosis develops in the glomeruli. The response to treatment can occur after several months. During the follow-up period, CD19 cells should be monitored carefully, and additional rituximab infusions considered to maintain B-cell depletion.

Development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) is associated with late or chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR) and poor graft outcome in low-risk kidney transplant recipients. High-level soluble B-cell activating factor (sBAFF) was observed in kidney recipients at higher risk of developing dnDSA.We longitudinally analyzed sBAFF levels in 81 consecutive primary pediatric kidney recipients monitored for de novo human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (Ab) occurrence to gain insight into the events conditioning B-cell activation posttransplant and to analyze the usefulness of paired DSA-sBAFF monitoring in this clinical setting.At a median follow-up of 65 months, 23 patients (28%) developed dnDSA, with 13 of 23 developing CAMR. Irrespective of HLA Ab status, sBAFF levels progressively increased in all patients in the first posttransplant year, thereafter reaching a plateau. sBAFF levels were influenced by the degree of HLA class I antigen match and donor age. Despite higher levels of sBAFF in HLA Ab-positive patients (median and 95% confidence interval sBAFF in DSA+non-DSA patients: 568, 534-608 pg/mL vs. 502, 422-548 pg/mL in Ab-negative patients; P0.05), we found that sBAFF monitoring could not predict DSA development by a time to event longitudinal analysis. Moreover, sBAFF kinetics up to CAMR onset could not anticipate CAMR development in the DSA cohort.Our findings provide evidence of early posttransplant B-cell activation even in unsensitized recipients of first kidney allograft. The significance of this activation, likely induced by exposition to the allograft, is yet unclear.