Search

Background: Liver graft size, anatomy of the bile duct and the vascular inflow and outflow are essential for living related liver transplantation (LRLT). Preoperative delineation of those variations that would change the operative procedure to achieve a successful result especially in an emergency condition., Purpose: Our aim was to develop a rapid and noninvasive imaging diagnostic method for the detection of anatomical variants that is mandatory for a safe operation when selecting potential liver transplant living donors. We used a different magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique, which enabled to us to exploit the anatomical landmark of the liver, signal enhancement of blood flow in the abdomen, and the intrahepatic biliary routes inside the liver. Then, with the help of Advantage Window workstation reconstruction, the reconstructed single vascular or biliary systems were displaced in a three-dimensional fashion and the whole examination finished within 30 min., Methods: Modification of the standard MR technique was performed on a superconductive 1.5T whole body image scanner, MR arteriogaphy, venography, and cholangiography with three-dimensional reconstruction in evaluating the anatomy of the hepatic arteries, hepatic veins, portal venous system, bile ducts, and liver size in potential liver transplant living donors. These anatomical structures were compared with traditional imaging methods., Results: In all 38 cases, as well as delineation of the portal vein detail to the segmental level was satisfactorily obtained in this MR study. The images were well displayed in a three-dimensional fashion, which had good correlation with images from traditional imaging modalities and operative findings. In 86.8% cases, the MR arteriography was well matched with the celiac angiography. Of those 17 operative cases, estimation of liver volume was well correlated with the liver graft within 3.9-12.5% variation. In the major hepatic vein, we obtained 100% accuracy and 88.2% in the minor branches. Of 12 donors received intraoperative cholangiography during liver donation, good correlation of biliary anatomy was achieved. One donor was excluded from graft donation due to the complicated arterial supply to the left liver. According to the anatomical variation, surgical procedures in graft harvesting and anastomosis were readjusted and no major complications were found in those donors and all recipients survived after liver transplantation., Conclusion: MR volumetry, venography, angiography, and cholangiography with three-dimensional reconstruction is sufficient for all major imaging evaluation. It may replace the traditional conventional catheter angiography, computed tomography, sonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as a single investigation in the evaluation of the potential liver transplant donors. Angiography is only valuable in suboptimal cases and intraoperative cholangiography is only performed in biliary ductile variants.

Background: Hepatic venous reconstruction is critical in living donor liver transplantation because outflow obstruction may lead to graft dysfunction or loss. We describe our experience and analyze outcomes with a technique of creating a single outflow tract using venoplasties of the graft and recipient hepatic veins., Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was done on 38 consecutive living donor liver transplants performed from June 1994 to March 2000. The grafts included 36 left-side grafts and 2 right-side grafts. Nine grafts had multiple hepatic veins and required a venoplasty of two or three hepatic veins to create a single outflow orifice. Triple recipient hepatic venoplasty was performed in 32 patients, double venoplasty in 5 and none in 1., Results: There were four cases of outflow obstruction, three occurring in patients with a double recipient venoplasty. Two of the problems were remedied intraoperatively by adjusting the position of the graft although two were structural in nature and required the insertion of expandable metallic vascular stents. All donors and recipients with their original grafts are alive at a mean follow-up period of 27 months., Conclusion: A triple recipient venoplasty with a matching venoplasty of multiple graft hepatic veins to create a single wide outflow orifice is recommended in living donor liver transplantation using left side grafts.

Background: Preoperative mapping of the hepatic venous system of the partial liver graft is indispensable to the success of living-related liver transplantation. We assessed the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) venography with angular reconstruction in depicting the tributaries of the middle hepatic vein and left hepatic vein in the donors, which was essential in graft retrieval and venoplasty., Methods: Nineteen living-related liver transplantation donors underwent a pretransplantation survey, including sonography and MRI for hepatic venous evaluation. T1-weighted images were reconstructed manually, using the inferior vena cava as a fixed point for tilting to produce an oblique plane image where both the middle hepatic vein and left hepatic vein could be demonstrated draining into the inferior vena cava. The reconstructed images of the hepatic veins were compared with preoperative sonography, intraoperative sonography, and operative findings., Results: Preoperative sonography and MR findings correlated well with the operative findings in the major hepatic veins. The MR venography of the ramification of the hepatic veins has an accuracy of 93%, the sonography, 84%. Sonography is slightly inferior in the evaluation of the hepatic vein in segment 4 and the left superior hepatic vein, with an accuracy of 73% and 67%, respectively., Conclusion: MR venography with angular reconstruction is accurate in depicting the complex distribution of the hepatic veins of the left liver, providing important information for decision making as to the cutting plane during graft retrieval and the method of venoplasty and anastomosis. Thus, unnecessary blood loss could be avoided and vascular complications could be prevented, as these conditions would be unacceptable for a healthy living donor. We propose that MR venography, a rapid and reliable technique, is an appropriate alternative examination or complementary modality to sonography in the pretransplantation evaluation of the living donor.