Search

Background: We evaluated the importance and mechanism of graft and host accommodation in hamster-to-rat cardiac xenotransplantation models., Methods: To evaluate graft accommodation, accommodated hamster grafts (Group 2) were transplanted to naïve host rats treated with FK506, and compared with naïve hamster grafts (Group 1). To evaluate host accommodation, three groups were evaluated: naive hamster hearts were transplanted to naïve hosts treated with FK506 (Group 3: 0.5 mg/kg, Group 4: 1.0 mg/kg) and splenectomy, and compared with accommodating hosts (Group 5) with FK506 0.5 mg/kg and splenectomy. We examined graft survival, histopathology, antihamster antibodies and B-1 cells in blood., Results: Graft survival in Group 2 (3.4+/-0.9 days) was not significantly different from that in Group 1 (2.8+/-0.4 days). Graft survival in Groups 4 and 5 (>30 days) was significantly prolonged compared with that in Group 3 (6.0+/-0.7 days). Histopathology of Groups 1-3 showed humoral rejection, whereas Groups 4 and 5 showed normal histology and expression of protective genes. In Groups 1-3, antihamster immunoglobulin (Ig) M and B-1 cells increased significantly compared to Groups 4 and 5, where IgM and B-1 cells remained low or were reduced., Conclusions: Host accommodation was more important than graft accommodation. Accommodating grafts expressing protective genes were rejected with an elevation of both IgM and B-1 cells. In accommodated hosts, both IgM and B-1 cells decreased, suggesting that B-1 cells may be responsible for the production of antihamster antibodies. These results suggest that sufficient suppression of B-1 cells, resulting in decreased titers of antihamster antibodies, may play an important role in host accommodation.

Background: Copolymer 1 (Cop 1) was previously shown to prevent graft-versus-host disease and interfere in various manifestations of immune rejection. In this study, we tested whether Cop 1 can also hinder the reactivity of host against graft and inhibit graft rejection., Methods: Cop 1 was tested in two transplantation systems: skin and thyroid grafting assays. The effect of Cop 1 on T cell reactivity was investigated by proliferation and cytokine secretion of spleen and lymph node cells from transplanted mice, as well as the T cell lines generated therefrom., Results: Cop 1 treatment prolonged skin graft survival and inhibited the functional deterioration of thyroid grafts, in various strain combinations, across minor and major histocompatibility barriers, similarly to the potent immunosuppressive drug FK506. Cop 1 inhibited the proliferation of graft-specific T cell lines, as well as their interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) secretion, when incubated in vitro with the stimulating allogeneic cells. Spleen and lymph node cells from Cop 1-treated mice, as well as the T cell lines generated from them, demonstrated a pronounced inhibition of proliferation and secretion of T helper (Th)1 cytokines in response to graft cells. In addition, cells from Cop 1-treated mice secreted high amounts of Th2 cytokines in response to Cop 1 and small but significant amounts of Th2 cytokines, mainly IL-10, in response to allograft cells., Conclusions: Cop 1 treatment inhibited the Th1 response to graft and induced a Th2 cytokines secretion in response to both Cop 1 and graft cells, leading to improved survival and function of the transplanted grafts.

Background: We aimed to identify the polymorphic epitopes that mitigate graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and host-versus-graft response (HvGR) toward rat small bowel allografts in rats., Methods: We tailored class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) allochimeric antigens encoding 10 al-helical (alpha(1h)l58-80-RT1.Aa) or 4 (alpha(1h)l/u62-69-RT1.Aa) polymorphic amino acids. In the GvHD model, ACI (RT1a) donors were pretreated (day -14) with an intrathymic injection of alpha(1h)l58-80-RT1.Aa, alpha(1h)l/u62-69-RT1.Aa, or RT1.Al protein, with or without simultaneous intravenous injection of anti-T-cell receptor R73 monoclonal antibodies. Wistar-Furth (WF; RT1u) donors were tested with a similar protocol. In the HvGR model, ACI recipients were treated with a protocol designed to induce transplantation tolerance toward WF heart allografts: a portal vein injection of alpha(1h)l/u62-69-RT1.Aa protein and cyclosporine (4 mg/kg, intramuscular; days 0-6)., Results: GvHD was prevented in all (ACI x LEW) F1 recipients (RT1a/l) by pretreating ACI donors with R73 monoclonal antibody and recipient RT1.Al or alpha(1h)l58-80-RT1.Aa protein. Similarly, pretreatment of WF donors with RT1.Aa protein also prevented GvHD in (ACI x WF) F1 recipients. However, in a combined GvHD/HvGR model, ACI recipient perioperative treatment designed to prevent HvGR only modestly prolonged WF small bowel allograft survival (27.7+/-5.3 days compared to 17.4+/-4.6 days in the cyclosporine-alone group). In contrast, application of the two protocols significantly prolonged WF allograft survival (55.6+/-34.6 days), with two of seven recipients surviving more than 100 days., Conclusion: Simultaneous inhibition of GvHD and HvGR significantly prolongs small bowel allograft survival.

In the present experiments, a multimodality regimen was developed that included an anti-T cell receptor R73 monoclonal antibody and the pharmacologic agents brequinar (BQR), cyclosporine (CsA), and sirolimus (rapamycin; RAPA) to prolong the survival of small bowel (SB) allografts. BQR was the most potent single drug: the 4.0 or 8.0 mg/kg/day BQR doses delivered every second day (q.o.d.) per gavage for 28 days prolonged the survival of Brown Norway (BN; RT1n) SB allografts in Lewis (LEW; RT1l) recipients from a mean survival time of 10.6 +/- 1.9 days in untreated controls to 29.2 +/- 5.8 days, respectively (both P < 0.001). When treatment was extended to 56 days, 8.0 mg/kg/q.o.d BQR produced a mean survival time of 83.8 +/0 33.8 days (P < 0.001), with 2/5 hosts surviving more than 100 days. In a host-versus-graft model, BQR (8.0 mg/kg/q.o.d) delivered for 28 days with CsA (2.0 mg/kg/day) and RAPA (0.04 mg/kg/day) delivered intravenously for 14 days prolonged the survival of BN SB grafts in LEW recipients to 54.4 +/- 21.0 days (P < 0.001). Extending triple-drug therapy to 42 days induced the prolongation of SB allograft survival to greater than 100 days in 5/7 recipients. Although pretransplant perfusion of the grafts with R73 mAb was ineffective alone, the combination of graft perfusion and a 28-day course of BQR (8.0 mg/kg/q.o.d) in the GVH model indefinitely prolonged LEW graft in F1 recipients. Alternatively, indefinite survival of SB allografts ( > 100 days; P < 0.001) was achieved by the combination of a 14-day course of a triple-drug regimen using each agent at subtherapeutic doses, namely BQR (2.0 mg/kg/q.o.d.), CsA (2.0 mg/kg/day), and RAPA (0.04 mg/kg/day). The state of transplantation tolerance is these hosts was documented by the acceptance of donor-type but not third-party heart allografts.

The effect of rapamycin (RAPA) as graft pretreatment was evaluated in orthotopic small bowel and kidney allotransplantation (Tx) in the rat. In the small bowel Tx model, six groups were involved, each including three combinations for evaluation of host-versus-graft (HVG) [Lewis (LEW) x Brown Norway (BN) (LBN)-F1-->Lewis], graft-versus-host (GVH) (LEW-->F1), and combined HVG and GVH immune responses (BN-->LEW). RAPA graft pretreatment alone (16 micrograms/ml x 3 ml) was able to induce a modest but significant prolongation of survival in all three combination models compared with controls (P < 0.05). The same was observed for low dose CsA treatment (2 mg/kg/day x 14 days) of the recipient only (P < 0.05). Combination of graft pretreatment with RAPA and CsA recipient treatment produced a marked prolongation of survival especially in HVG response. Recipients treatment with one 48-microgram bolus of RAPA i.v. immediately after graft revascularization failed to achieve any prolongation of survival for the GVH or combined HVG and GVH responses. This seems to exclude a "carry-over" effect of RAPA from graft to recipient. RAPA efficacy was also clearly confirmed in the kidney graft pretreatment model as compared to recipient treatment with an equivalent RAPA dose. These results demonstrate that graft RAPA pretreatment prolongs SB survival after Tx in the rat for HVG, GVH, and bidirectional immune responses. Intragraft interaction with passenger leukocytes or APC function appears as one of the possible mechanisms. RAPA graft pretreatment potentiates low dose CsA recipient treatment suggesting a possible use in clinical organ Tx.

The effect of rapamycin (RAPA) on both host-versus-graft (HVG) and graft-versus-host (GVH) immune responses was examined in small bowel transplant models using strongly histoincompatible donor-recipient combinations. Normal Wistar Furth (WFu; RT-1u) recipients rejected Buffalo (BUF; RT-1b) small bowel allografts within a mean survival time (MST) of 10.5 +/- 0.5 days. Administration of RAPA (0.8 mg/kg) by continuous intravenous infusion for 14 days via an osmotic pump prolonged graft survival to 25.0 +/- 4.6 days (P = 0.01). In a second strain combination, the 12.5 +/- 2.2 day survival of Brown Norway (BN; RT-1n) small bowel allografts in Lewis (RT-1l) recipients was prolonged to 21.6 +/- 2.0 and 28.5 +/- 2.8 days by 14 days of i.v. RAPA at doses of 0.8 and 1.6 mg/kg, respectively. In this model RAPA is five times more effective than cyclosporine, which at 4.0 mg/kg prolongs BN small bowel allografts in Lewis recipients to 21.6 +/- 6.3. To isolate HVG and GVH immune responses, (BN x Lewis)F1 hybrid rats served as the graft donor or host, respectively. In the HVG model, (BN x Lewis)F1 small bowel allografts, which were rejected by normal Lewis recipients at 12.2 +/- 3.6 days, were prolonged to 40.8 +/- 5.8 days (P = 0.001) by RAPA (0.8 mg/kg x 14 days). In the GVH model, the ability of Lewis small bowel allografts to produce severe GVH disease in untreated (BN x Lewis)F1 recipients at 12.3 +/- 2.8 days was delayed to 21.3 +/- 5.2 days by 0.8 mg/kg RAPA (P = 0.025). Thus, RAPA protects small bowel allografts more effectively against HVG than GVH immune responses.

The effect of cyclosporine on a systemic graft-versus-host reaction, cardiac allograft rejection, and a local host-versus-graft reaction in the rat were examined in detail. Therapeutic levels of CsA did not inhibit the early stages of lymphocyte activation but did prevent maturation of the immune response to full effector function--viz., graft rejection or clinical GVH disease. In all three models the phenotype changes in T cells associated with the early stages of activation--i.e., induction of receptors for interleukin 2 (IL-R), induction of MHC class II expression, and coexpression of CD4 and CD8 glycoproteins--were not inhibited by CsA. In the GVH and HVG reactions lymphocyte activation proceeded as far as DNA synthesis. In the systemic GVH model animals showed no sign of GVHD for as long as CsA was administered, but withdrawal of the drug resulted in accelerated lethal GVHD.

Based on studies in lymphocyte cultures it has been suggested that endogenous prostaglandins (PG), especially those of the E series (PGE), suppress cell-mediated immune reactions during their induction phase. We have tested this theory in experimental animals using local host-versus-graft (HVG) and graft-versus-host (GVH) reactions in mice. These reactions were suppressed in a dose-dependent manner by treatment of the animals with PGE1. If, however, endogenous PGE was neutralized through treatment of the animals with immune sera directed against PGE (APSE1) then inhibition of the development of HVG and GVH reactions was seen. This inhibition could be abrogated in "add back" experiments by treatment of the animals with PGE1. We suggest that the action of PGE1 during the induction phase of CMI responses is governed by a bell-shaped dose-response curve with a response-enhancing effect at low PGE1 and a suppressive effect at high PGE1 concentrations. APSE1 has proved to be very effective in inhibiting responses, and thus treatment with anti-PG antibodies may not only represent a valuable tool for the study of the role of PG in immunoregulation, but may become useful in therapeutic interventions with the immune system--e.g., after bone marrow transplantation.