Search

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a cause of considerable morbidity and mortality among orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. To study the impact of CMV on cost and hospital length of stay in this population, we undertook an analysis of a cohort of OLT recipients from four transplant centers in Boston who participated in a CMV prophylaxis trial. First posttransplant year hospital length of stay (including the hospital stay after transplantation and readmissions within 1 year after transplantation) was available for all 141 patients included in the study. In a multiple linear regression model bacteremia (P=0.0001), CMV disease (P=0.0007), abdominal reexploration (excluding retransplantation) (P=0.0070), recipient age < or = 16 years (P=0.0352), and the number of units of blood products (red blood cells, platelets, or fresh frozen plasma) administered during transplantation (P=0.0523) were shown to be independently associated with longer first posttransplant year hospital length of stay. Cost data for in-hospital care for the year beginning with admission for liver transplantation were available for 66 OLT recipients. Using a multiple linear regression model, development of CMV disease (P=0.0001), the number of units of blood products administered during transplantation (P=0.0001), bacteremia (P=0.0002), decreased pretransplant renal function (estimated by creatinine clearance) (P=0.0109), and need for retransplantation (P=0.0619) were shown to be independently associated with higher cost. These data strongly suggest that CMV disease has a direct impact on cost and hospital length of stay in liver transplantation.

Livers from donors > or = 60 years of age are often considered inadequate for transplantation by many centers. With waiting times exceeding 1 year in our region, we have aggressively used livers from this donor age group. Between 1990 and 1994, 209 patients received 223 liver grafts at our institution. Of these, 29 (13%) were from donors > or = 60 years of age (group A) and 194 (87%) were from donors < 60 years of age (group B). The two groups were matched for recipient diagnosis and severity of disease. Group A and B donors had similar liver, renal, and hematologic studies prior to donation. Weight, sex, race and vasopressor requirement were also similar. Postoperative alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase,and prothrombin time were not significantly different over the first 10 postoperative days. Group A grafts were significantly more cholestatic than group B grafts on postoperative days 6-10. The retransplantation rate for primary graft nonfunction was not significantly different from group A (6.7%) and group B (3.4%; P=0.04). Patient and graft survival rates at 1 year were 58.6 % and 44.8% for group A and 79.2% and 74.5% for group B (P<0.001 for both). Four of 12 deaths in the first year in group A were completely unrelated to graft function. If these are excluded, patient and graft survival rates were 68% and 52%, which are better but still significantly less than in group B. Initial graft function of older donor livers are similar to that of the matched younger group. However, patient and graft survival rates were significantly worse for the older donors, even when corrected for unrelated deaths. Livers should not be discarded based on age alone without inspection and/or biopsy to rule out significant steatosis. Prompt retransplantation for primary graft nonfunction of older donors are generally more cholestatic than those from the younger donor age group; however, many of them function quite well. At the present time, given the inability to identify donor variables associated with decreased recipient survival, we recommend cautious use of older liver grafts in healthier recipients.

Liver transplantation for patients requiring life-support results in the lowest survival and highest costs. A ten year (1983-1993) regional experience with liver transplantation for critically ill patients was undertaken to ascertain the fate of several subgroups of patients. Of the 828 liver transplants performed at six transplant centers within the region over this period, 168 (20%) were done in patients who met today's criteria for a United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) status 1 (emergency) liver transplant candidate. Recipients were classified according to chronicity of disease and transplant number (primary-acute, primary-chronic, reTx-acute, reTx-chronic). Overall one-year survival was 50% for all status 1 recipients. The primary-acute subgroup (n = 63) experienced a 57% one-year survival compared with 50% for the primary-chronic (n = 51) subgroup (P = 0.07). Of the reTx-acute recipients (n = 43), 44% were alive at one year in comparison with 20% for the reTx-chronic (n = 11) group (P = 0.18). There was no significant difference in survival for the following: transplant center, blood group compatibility with donors, age, preservation solution, or graft size. For patients retransplanted for acute reasons (primary graft nonfunction (PGNF) or hepatic artery thrombosis [HAT]), survival was significantly better if a second donor was found within 3 days of relisting (52% vs. 20%; P = 0.012). Over the study period progressively fewer donor organs came from outside the region. No strong survival-based argument can be made for separating, in allocation priority, acute and chronic disease patients facing the first transplant as a status 1 recipient. Clearly patients suffering from PGNF or HAT do far better if retransplanted within 3 days. Establishing an even higher status for recipients with PGNF, perhaps drawing from a supraregional donor pool, would allow surgeons to accept more marginal donors, thus potentially expanding the pool, without significantly compromising patient survival. Retransplantation of the recipient with a chronically failing graft who deteriorates to the point of needing life-support is nearly futile, and in today's health care climate, not an optimal use of scarce donor livers.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine the incidence of major infectious complications after orthotopic liver transplantation and to compare outcomes in patients receiving either cyclosporine (CsA) or FK506 (tacrolimus) as primary immunosuppression. Of 133 transplants performed in 118 patients, 124 transplant episodes were evaluated. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (INF) and disease (DIS), deep fungal infection (DFI), and intraabdominal bacterial infections (IAI) were catalogued. The overall incidences of major infectious outcomes were: CMV INF = 33%; CMV DIS = 19%; DFI = 15%; and IAI = 25%. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified donor seropositivity, OKT3 as secondary immunosuppression and initial intensive care unit (ICU) duration as risk factors for CMV INF and DIS in the overall population. Fungal colonization was the dominant risk factor associated with deep fungal infection. A choledochojejunostomy anastomosis, the number of cellular blood products transfused at the time of transplantation surgery, and prior CMV INF were independent risk factors for both fungal colonization and deep infection. The single risk factor identified for intraabdominal bacterial infections was the number of cellular blood products transfused at the time of surgery. In the Cox proportional hazards model the relative risk (RR) for each category of infection was lower in the FK506 group (CMV: RR = .87, 95% confidence interval [C.I.] = [.32-2.4]; DFI: .58 [.13-2.6]; IAI: .51 [.15-1.7]), but the effect was not statistically significant. Survival was similar in patients receiving FK506 or CsA. CMV INF and DFI were independent predictors of death for all patients. Risk factors identified for CMV INF and DIS support the findings of others. Higher intraoperative blood product requirements and complicated intraoperative or postoperative courses increase the risk for IAI or DFI. The development of effective strategies to prevent CMV and fungal infections in liver transplant recipients remains a priority for future endeavors.

Because of the almost universal recurrence of hepatitis B surface antigenemia (HBsAg) after liver transplantation, some centers have questioned whether these patients are appropriate allograft candidates. Since January 1984, 51 patients with hepatitis B (HBV) underwent OLT at our center. No therapy was given to prevent reinfection. Three patients underwent retransplantation. The indications for transplant included fulminant HBV (13 patients), chronic HBV (33 patients), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCCA) in addition to HBV (5 patients). Incidental HCCA was found in 2 of the 33 patients thought to have only chronic HBV. Actuarial survival for the entire group was 57% at 1 year and 54% at 3 years. Of the 23 patients who died, only 4 deaths were attributable to recurrent HBV liver disease. Four patients survived less than 4 days due to primary graft nonfunction. Ten patients died in the first 3 months from sepsis. Although all patients who died beyond 30 days had recurrent HBsAg, only 4 deaths were attributable to recurrent HBV. The remaining 5 deaths were caused by portal vein thrombosis, bile leak, lymphoma, pancreatitis, and sepsis occurring at 15 months. Excluding the 4 patients who died from primary graft nonfunction, actuarial survival was 63% at 1 year and 60% at 3 years. Of the 28 survivors, 24 are HBsAg positive; however, only 5 have recurrent HBV liver disease. Multiple factors were evaluated to determine their influence on survival; i.e., HBV serology, United Network for Organ Sharing status, fulminant versus chronic HBV, incidence of rejection, immunosuppression, transfusion requirements, and presence of HCCA. Of these, only the presence of HCCA adversely affected outcome. Of the 7 patients with HCCA and HBV, 6 patients died within the first 6 months and 1 patient has recurrent HBV liver disease at 25 months. Actuarial survival excluding those patients with HCCA was 64% at 1 year and 61% at 3 years. Based on our results, patients with HBV and associated HCCA have a poorer prognosis and should probably be excluded from transplantation. Although the survival for patients with HBV undergoing liver transplantation is inferior to that expected in patients with some other diagnoses, long-term survival can be achieved in a majority of these patients despite recurrence of HBsAg. We believe that appropriately selected patients with a diagnosis of HBV alone should continue to be candidates for liver allografts.

The assessment of portal vein patency in patients selected as candidates for orthotopic liver transplantation should be accomplished noninvasively and with great accuracy. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a new technique that is completely noninvasive and is capable of graphically assessing portal vein anatomy and blood flow. In an attempt to establish the accuracy of portal venous MRA, 74 patients with established cirrhosis underwent abdominal MRA prior to liver transplantation. MRA findings were correlated with surgical findings at the time of transplantation in all patients, and were shown to be extremely accurate. The three-dimensional images generated by MRA and computer postprocessing allowed for correct identification of portal venous anatomy in all of the patients examined. We conclude that MRA is an extremely useful method of determining portal venous anatomy in potential liver transplant patients, and potentially offers greater definition and clarify compared with other non-invasive methods.

Hepatic retransplantation (reTx) offers the only alternative to death for patients who have failed primary hepatic transplantation (PTx). Assuming a finite number of donor organs, reTx also denies the chance of survival for some patients awaiting PTx. The impact of reTx on overall survival (i.e., the survival of all candidates for transplantation) must therefore be clarified. Between 1983 and 1991, 651 patients from the New England Organ Bank underwent liver transplantation, and 73 reTx were performed in 71 patients (11% reTx rate). The 1-year actuarial survival for reTx (48%) was significantly less than for PTx (70%, P < 0.05). This survival varied, dependent on the interval of time following PTx in which the reTx was performed (0-3 days, 57% survival; 4-30 days, 24%; 30-365 days, 54%; and > 365 days, 83%). Patients on the regional waiting list had an 18% mortality rate while awaiting transplantation. These results were incorporated into a mathematical model describing survival as a function of reTx rate, assuming a limited supply of donor livers. ReTx improves the 1-year survival rate for patients undergoing PTx but decreases overall survival (survival of all candidates) for liver transplantation. In the current era of persistently insufficient donor numbers, strategies based on minimizing the use of reTx, especially in the case of patients in whom chances of success are minimal, will result in the best overall rate of patient survival.

Fifteen hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients treated with orthotopic liver transplantation were studied to determine whether any clinical, serologic, or histologic data were predictive for recurrent hepatitis B infection leading to graft failure. Six patients died early, one due to primary graft nonfunction and the remaining five due to septic complications. There were nine patients surviving longer than two months, eight of whom are alive at a mean follow-up of 556 days. HBsAg and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) reappeared in the sera of all survivors after a variable transient period of clearance. One patient died 3 months posttransplant of fungal sepsis and was found to have histologic evidence for recurrent hepatitis and positive immunoperoxidase staining postmortem. The remaining eight survivors are home and clinically well, with no histologic evidence of hepatitis. Seven of these eight patients have hepatitis B viral DNA in their sera. We conclude that while there is a high early mortality, usually from sepsis, none of the serologic, histologic, or DNA data analyzed can be used to predict graft loss from recurrent hepatitis. No grafts have been lost due to recurrent hepatitis B in this series, and therefore we believe that HBsAg positive patients should not be excluded from transplantation.