Search

Livers for transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors are relatively more prone to early and ongoing alterations in graft function that might ultimately lead to graft loss and even patient death. In consideration of this fact, this working group of the International Liver Transplantation Society has performed a critical evaluation of the medical literature to create a set of statements regarding the assessment of early allograft function/dysfunction and complications arising in the setting of donation after circulatory death liver transplantation.

De novo malignancies (DNMs) following liver transplantation (LT) have been reported as 1 of the major causes of late mortality, being the most common cause of death in the second decade after LT. The overall incidence of DNMs is reported to be in the range of 3.1% to 14.4%, and the incidence is 2- to 3-fold higher in transplant recipients than in age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Long-term immunosuppressive therapy, which is the key in maintaining host tolerance and achieving good long-term outcomes, is known to contribute to a higher risk of DNMs. However, the incidence and type of DNM also depends on different risk factors, including patient demographics, cause of the underlying chronic liver disease, behavior (smoking and alcohol abuse), and pre-existing premalignant conditions. The estimated standardized incidence ratio for different DNMs is also variable. The International Liver Transplantation Society-Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation Consensus Conference working group on DNM has summarized and discussed the current available literature on epidemiology, risk factors, management, and survival after DNMs. Recommendations for screening and surveillance for specific tumors, as well as immunosuppression and cancer-specific management in patients with DNM, are summarized.

Background Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) has been associated with a high incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy and other perioperative complications. In an attempt to avoid these complications, we implemented an active protocol of cDCD liver transplant (LT) with normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) preservation. Methods This is a descriptive analysis of data collected from a prospective date base of cDCD LT preserved with NRP from January 2015 to June 2017 with a minimum follow up of 9 months. Results Fifty-seven potential cDCD donors were connected to the NRP system. Of these, 46 livers were transplanted over a 30-month period (80% liver recovery rate). The median posttransplant peak in alanine transaminase was 1136 U/L (220-6683 U/L). Seven (15%) patients presented postreperfusion syndrome and 11 (23%) showed early allograft dysfunction. No cases of ischemic cholangiopathy were diagnosed, and no graft loss was observed over a medium follow-up period of 19 months. Of note, 13 donors were older than 65 years, achieving comparable perioperative and midterm results to younger donors. Conclusions As far as we know, this represents the largest published series of cDCD LT with NRP preservation. Our results demonstrate that cDCD liver grafts preserved with NRP appear far superior to those obtained by the conventional rapid recovery technique.