Search

Background: Prognostic factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) are still a matter of debate. The absence of viable tumor in the native liver, due to effectiveness of pre-LT locoregional treatment or liver resection, is an intriguing prognostic factor that had never been evaluated., Methods: Between November 2000 and December 2011, 210 LTs were performed in patients with evidence of HCC and cirrhosis., Results: Fifty-three (25.2%) patients did not show any evidence of active residual HCC in the native liver (Group NVH), whereas 157 (74.8%) patients showed viable HCC (Group VH). All patients in Group NVH were treated before LT with a multimodal approach combining transarterial chemoembolization, liver resection, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, or sorafenib, whereas, in Group VH, 110 of the 157 (70.1%) patients received bridging therapy (P<0.001). HCC recurrence occurred in none of the patients in Group NVH (0%) and in 25 (15.9%) patients in Group VH (P=0.003). Liver resection was the most effective treatment in obtaining absence of HCC on liver explantation. The results of multivariate analysis showed that existence of pathologic HCC findings outside of the University of California-San Francisco criteria (P=0.001; odds ratio, 4; confidence interval, 1.7-9.2) and the presence of viable HCC (P=0.003; odds ratio, 5.9; confidence interval, 1.5-17.6) were independently associated with HCC recurrence., Conclusions: The histologic absence of viable HCC in the native liver after LT and morphologic criteria, due to the high effectiveness of pre-LT bridging treatments, is a highly positive prognostic factor against HCC recurrence after LT.

Background: The growing prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the general population has resulted in an increased frequency of potential organ donors that carry the virus. Given the significant disparity between organ supply and demand for transplantation, it becomes essential to consider whether livers from anti-HCV-positive donors may be considered suitable for transplantation., Methods: Based on a multicenter European database, 694 patients with HCV-related cirrhosis underwent liver transplantation and 11% of them received the graft from anti-HCV-positive donors. Of this group, we selected 63 patients (study group) and, after a 1:1 case-control approach, compared them with 63 patients that received an anti-HCV-negative donor graft (control group). Only grafts with preperfusion liver biopsy results with a fibrosis score of not more than 1 were used for transplantation., Results: Patients who received anti-HCV-positive grafts had a cumulative survival rate of 83.6% and 61.7% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, vs. 95.1% and 68.2% for the control group. In comparing overall patient and graft survival, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.22 and 0.11). Recurrence of hepatitis C tended to be more rapid in the group of patients who received anti-HCV-positive grafts, although it did not reach statistical significance (P=0.07)., Conclusions: We do not recommend the indiscriminate use of anti-HCV-positive donors, especially if HCV-RNA positive, as the use of this kind of graft could be linked to an advanced stage of fibrosis, the main risk factor we observed for earlier hepatitis C recurrence.

Introduction: Some experimental trials have demonstrated that rapamycin (RAPA) is able to inhibit HIV-1 progression in three different ways: (1) reducing CCR5-gene transcription, (2) blocking interleukin-2 intracellular secondary messenger (mammalian target of rapamycin), and (3) up-regulating the beta-chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP; MIP-1alpha and MIP-1beta). We present the preliminary results of a prospective nonrandomized trial concerning the first HIV patient series receiving RAPA monotherapy after liver transplantation (LT)., Methods: Since June 2003, 14 HIV patients have received cadaveric donor LT due to end-stage liver disease (ESLD) associated or not associated with hepatocellular carcinoma, scored by the model for ESLD system. Patients were assessed using the following criteria for HIV characterization: CD4 T-cell count more than 100/mL and HIV-RNA levels less than 50 copies/mL. Primary immunosuppression was based on calcineurin inhibitors (CI), whereas switch to RAPA monotherapy occurred in cases of CI complications or Kaposi's sarcoma., Results: Mean overall post-LT follow-up was 14.8 months (range: 0.5-52.6). Six of 14 patients were administered RAPA monotherapy. Mean preswitch period from CI to RAPA was 67 days (range: 10-225 days). Mean postswitch follow-up was 11.9 months (range: 2-31 months). All patients were affected by ESLD, which was associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in seven patients. ESLD occurred due to hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related hepatopathy for nine patients, hepatitis B virus-related hepatopathy for one patient, and hepatitis B virus-HCV hepatopathy for four patients. Significantly better control of HIV and HCV replication was found among patients taking RAPA monotherapy (P=0.0001 and 0.03, respectively)., Conclusions: After in vitro and in vivo experimental evidence of RAPA antiviral proprieties, to our knowledge, this is the first clinical report of several significant benefits in long-term immunosuppression maintenance and HIV-1 control among HIV positive patients who underwent LT.

Background: Although the University of Wisconsin (U.W.) solution continues to be the most commonly used for intra-abdominal organs, a new solution, Celsior, already used for heart and lungs, has been proposed for kidney and liver preservation. The aim of this research was to assess the effect of Celsior as compared with U.W. on immediate graft function and a 2-year follow-up of kidney transplants., Methods: A prospective multicenter randomized study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of the Celsior solution in the clinical preservation of the kidney. In this report, we present the data collected as of September 2000. One hundred donors were included in the trial resulting in 187 renal transplants. Ninety-nine kidneys were stored in Celsior solution and 88 in U.W. solution. The groups were comparable with regard to donor and recipient characteristics., Results: Delayed graft function occurred in 31.3% of the Celsior group and in 33.9% of the U.W. group (P=n.s.). Mean serum creatinine levels and mean daily urinary output were also comparable. Two year graft survival in kidneys preserved with Celsior was 84% as compared with 75% for U.W.-preserved kidneys without any significant statistical difference., Conclusions: Our data show that the preservation of kidneys in Celsior solution in a clinical setting is equivalent to that of U.W. solution. When using Celsior during multiple-organ donor harvesting it would be possible to perform an in situ flush of all intra-abdominal and intrathoracic organs with a single cold storage solution.