Search

Background: Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is an important complication for solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). COVID-19 has been associated with an increased risk of incident diabetes in the general population. However, the association between COVID-19 and new-onset PTDM has not been explored., Methods: Using the National COVID Cohort Collaborative Enclave, we conducted a cohort study of adults without diabetes receiving a solid organ transplant (heart, lung, kidney, or liver) in the United States between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2023, with and without a first diagnosis of COVID-19 (COVID+ versus COVID-) within 180 d of SOT. We propensity score matched a single COVID+ SOTR with a COVID- SOTR who was diabetes free at the same point posttransplant. Within this matched cohort, we used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to examine the adjusted risk of PTDM associated with COVID+., Results: Among 1342 COVID+ SOTRs matched to 1342 COVID- SOTRs, the crude rate of newly diagnosed PTDM in the 2 y post-COVID was 17% in those with versus 13% in those without COVID-19 (P = 0.007). COVID-19 was significantly associated with new PTDM (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.68 at 2 y)., Conclusions: Similar to other viral infections, COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of PTDM in SOTRs., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Kidney transplant recipients show sex differences in excess overall mortality risk that vary by donor sex and recipient age. However, whether the excess risk of death with graft function (DWGF) differs by recipient sex is unknown., Methods: In this study, we combined data from 3 of the largest transplant registries worldwide (Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient, Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, and Collaborative Transplant Study) using individual patient data meta-analysis to compare the excess risk of DWGF between male and female recipients of a first deceased donor kidney transplant (1988-2019), conditional on donor sex and recipient age., Results: Among 463 895 individuals examined, when the donor was male, female recipients aged 0 to 12 y experienced a higher excess risk of DWGF than male recipients (relative excess risk 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.29); there were no significant differences in other age intervals or at any age when the donor was female. There was no statistically significant between-cohort heterogeneity., Conclusions: Given the lack of sex differences in the excess risk of DWGF (other than in prepubertal recipients of a male donor kidney) and the known greater excess overall mortality risk for female recipients compared with male recipients in the setting of a male donor, future study is required to characterize potential sex-specific causes of death after graft loss., Competing Interests: A.J.V. has accepted consulting fees and fellowship grant funding from Paladin Labs Inc. A.M. is supported by grants from the German Research Foundation (DFG; ME 3696/5-1 and ME3696/3-1) and the Lower Saxony Ministry of Science and Culture. C.S. is supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant 952512). G.W. is supported by National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator (APP 1195414) and Career Development Fellowship (APP 1147657). R.S.-P. is supported by a Fonds de recherche du Quebec—Santé chercheur boursier clinician award (grant 254386) and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant FRN-156730). The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Referral for kidney transplant (KT) is variable, with women often disadvantaged. This study aimed to better characterize Canadian transplant referral practices and identify potential differences by respondent and/or patient gender using surveys targeted at healthcare practitioners (HCPs) involved in KT., Methods: Surveys consisting of 25 complex patient cases representing 7 themes were distributed to KT HCPs across Canada (March 3, 2022-April 27, 2022) using national nephrology/transplant society email registries. Respondents were asked whether they would refer the patient for transplant. Two identical surveys were created, differing only by gender/gender pronouns used in each case. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association of respondent demographics and patient themes (including case gender) with the odds of transplant referral (overall and stratifying by respondent gender)., Results: Overall, the referral rate was 58.0% among 97 survey respondents (46.4% male). Case themes associated with a lower likelihood of referral included adherence concerns (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.94), medical complexity (aOR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.85), and perceived frailty (aOR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.84). Respondent gender was not associated with differences in KT referral (aOR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.65-1.26 for male versus female respondents) but modified the association of frailty (less referral for male than female respondents, P  = 0.005) and medical complexity (less referral for female than male respondents, P  = 0.009) with referral. There were no differences in referral rate by case gender ( P  = 0.82)., Conclusions: KT referral practices vary among Canadian HCPs. In this study, there were no differences in likelihood of transplant referral by candidate gender., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sex differences in kidney graft loss rates were reported in the United States. Whether these differences are present in other countries is unknown., Methods: We estimated the association between recipient sex and death-censored graft loss in patients of all ages recorded in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, and Collaborative Transplant Study registries who received a first deceased donor kidney transplant (1988-2019). We used multivariable Cox regression models, accounting for the modifying effects of donor sex and recipient age, in each registry separately; results were combined using individual patient data meta-analysis., Results: We analyzed 438 585 patients. Young female patients 13-24 y old had the highest crude graft loss rates (female donor: 5.66; male donor: 5.50 per 100 person-years). Among young recipients of male donors, females showed higher graft loss risks than males (0-12 y: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.42, (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.73); 13-24 y: 1.24 (1.17-1.32); 25-44 y: 1.09 (1.06-1.13)). When the donor was female, there were no significant differences by recipient sex among those of age <45 y; however, the aHR for females was 0.93 (0.89-0.98) in 45-59 y-old and 0.89 (0.86-0.93) in ≥ 60 y-old recipients. Findings were similar for all 3 registries in most age intervals; statistically significant heterogeneity was seen only among 13-24-y-old recipients of a female donor (I2 = 71.5%, P = 0.03)., Conclusions: There is an association between recipient sex and kidney transplantation survival that is modified by recipient age and donor sex., Competing Interests: A.J.V. has accepted consulting fees and fellowship grant funding from Paladin Labs Inc. A.M. is supported by grants from the German Research Foundation (DFG; ME 3696/5-1 and ME3696/3-1) and the Lower Saxony Ministry of Science and Culture. G.W. is supported by NHMRC Investigator (APP 1195414) and Career Development Fellowship (APP 1147657). R.S.-P. is supported by a Fonds de recherche du Quebec—Santé chercheur boursier clinician award (grant no. 254386) and CIHR (grant FRN-156730). This study was supported by funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research PJT-165832. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.

Background: Because of the challenges with organ scarcity, many centers performing simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (SLKT) are opting to accept donation after circulatory death (DCD) organs as a means of facilitating earlier transplant and reducing death rates on the waitlist. It has been suggested, however, that DCD organs may have inferior graft and patient survival posttransplant compared with donation after neurologic death (DND) organs., Methods: We created a Markov model to compare the overall outcomes of accepting a DCD SLKT now versus waiting for a DND SLKT in patients waitlisted for SLKT, stratified by base Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (≤20, 21-30, >30)., Results: Waiting for DND SLKT was the preferred treatment strategy for patients with a MELD score of 30 or less (incremental value of 0.54 and 0.36 quality-adjusted life years for MELD score of 20 or less and MELD score of 21 to 30 with DND versus DCD SLKT, respectively). The option to accept a DCD SLKT became the preferred choice for those with a MELD score greater than 30 (incremental value of 0.31 quality-adjusted life years for DCD versus DND SLKT). This finding was confirmed in a probabilistic sensitivity analysis and persisted when analyzing total life years obtained for accept DCD versus do not accept DCD., Conclusions: There is a benefit to accepting DCD SLKT for patients with MELD score greater than 30. Although not accepting DCD SLKT and waiting for DND SLKT is the preferred option for patients with MELD of 30 or less, the incremental value is small.