Search

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) following orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) causes significant morbidity and mortality. There are limited data on antibodies to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) causing rejection following OHT.This is a retrospective, single-center study that presents our 2-y experience with a series of 11 patients with evidence of nonspecific graft dysfunction and pathologic levels of AT1R-Ab. The clinical outcomes and treatments were compared to a group of 10 patients, also with evidence of nonspecific graft dysfunction, but who had nonsignificant AT1R-Ab titers.The mean age of the AT1R-Ab cohort was 52% and 73% were bridged to transplant with an left ventricular assist device. The average left ventricular ejection fraction at presentation was 45%, and most were not on an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Endomyocardial biopsies in those with elevated AT1R-Ab levels frequently showed reactive endothelium/endocardium without C4d or intravascular CD68 staining. Ten patients (91%) were started on an ARB. Other therapies included plasmapheresis and IVIg (64%), with 4 patients also receiving rituximab. Most patients had symptom improvement, but minimal change in graft function at an average 6 mo of follow-up.The role of AT1R-Ab-mediated rejection in OHT recipients remains poorly understood. More than half of patients at our center who presented with graft dysfunction in the absence of acute cellular rejection or AMR were found to have elevated AT1R-Ab titers. Empiric AMR treatment in conjunction with ARB therapy may improve patient outcomes. Future studies are needed to better define the optimal treatment modalities for ATR1-Ab-mediated AMR.

Although solid organ transplant results have improved significantly in recent decades, a pivotal cause of impaired long-term outcome is the development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), a condition characterized by the presence of donor-specific antibodies to HLA or non-HLA antigens. Highly HLA-sensitized recipients are treated with desensitization protocols to rescue the transplantation. These and other therapies are also applied for the treatment of AMR. Therapeutic protocols include removal of antibodies, depletion of plasma and B cells, inhibition of the complement cascade, and suppression of the T-cell-dependent antibody response. As mounting evidence illustrates the importance of non-HLA antibodies in transplant outcome, there is a need to evaluate the efficacy of treatment protocols on non-HLA antibody levels and graft function. Many reviews have been recently published that provide an overview of the literature describing the association of non-HLA antibodies with rejection in transplantation, whereas an overview of the treatment options for non-HLA AMR is still lacking. In this review, we will therefore provide such an overview. Most reports showed positive effects of non-HLA antibody clearance on graft function. However, monitoring non-HLA antibody levels after treatment along with standardization of therapies is needed to optimally treat solid organ transplant recipients.

Initially overlooked in favor of T cell-mediated rejection, the importance of the humoral alloimmune response has progressively emerged. As a result, antibody-mediated rejection is now widely recognized as the main cause of late allograft loss in most (if not all) types of solid-organ transplantation. Over the last 2 decades, vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has appeared for replacing tissue defects in patients for whom no other satisfactory reconstructive options were available. Although it is now clear that VCA recipients can develop donor-specific antibodies, conclusions made in solid organ transplantation regarding antibody-mediated rejection may not systematically apply to VCA. Here, we propose to use the experience gained in organ transplantation to shed light on the path that shall be followed to evaluate and manage humoral alloreactivity in VCA recipients.

Background Management of the increasing number of sensitized heart transplant candidates has become a recurrent issue. Rather than using pretransplant desensitization therapies, we used a posttransplant prophylactic strategy. Our aim was to describe outcomes in transplant recipients with preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (pfDSA) managed with this strategy. Methods A posttransplant protocol was applied to patients transplanted with pfDSA, consisting of perioperative management of DSA (polyvalent immunoglobulins +/- perioperative plasmapheresis sessions, according to DSA level, as well as induction therapy) and systematic treatment of subsequent antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), even when subclinical. We performed a retrospective analysis of this prospective protocol. The study included all consecutive first recipients of a noncombined heart transplant performed between 2009 and 2015 at our center. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included primary graft dysfunction, early posttransplant bleeding, rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy-free survival. Results A total of 523 patients were studied, including 88 (17%) and 194 (37%) transplanted with DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 500 to 1000 and greater than 1000, respectively. The median follow-up period was 4.06 years. Survival was not significantly different between groups. Rejection-free survival was worse in patients with pfDSA MFI >1000, evidenced by a fourfold increase in the risk of antibody-mediated rejection. The incidence of primary graft dysfunction and cardiac allograft vasculopathy-free survival did not significantly differ between groups. Perioperative plasmapheresis increased the risk for transfusion of packed red blood cells. Conclusions This exclusively posttransplant prophylactic strategy achieved favorable outcomes in heart transplant recipients with pfDSA.

BACKGROUND There is no consensus guidance on when to reinitiate Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients at increased risk. The 2019 American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice (AST IDCOP) guidelines suggested to continue or reinstitute PJP prophylaxis in those receiving intensified immunosuppression for graft rejection, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, higher dose of corticosteroids, or prolonged neutropenia. METHODS A literature search was conducted evaluating all literature from existence through April 22, 2020, using MEDLINE and EMBASE. (The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registration number: CRD42019134204). RESULTS A total of 30 studies with 413 276 SOT recipients were included. The following factors were associated with PJP development: acute rejection (pooled odds ratio [pOR], 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-3.26); study heterogeneity index [I2] = 23.4%), CMV-related illnesses (pOR, 3.14; 95% CI, 2.30-4.29; I2 = 48%), absolute lymphocyte count

Initially overlooked in favor of T cell-mediated rejection, the importance of the humoral alloimmune response has progressively emerged. As a result, antibody-mediated rejection is now widely recognized as the main cause of late allograft loss in most (if not all) types of solid-organ transplantation. Over the last 2 decades, vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has appeared for replacing tissue defects in patients for whom no other satisfactory reconstructive options were available. Although it is now clear that VCA recipients can develop donor-specific antibodies, conclusions made in solid organ transplantation regarding antibody-mediated rejection may not systematically apply to VCA. Here, we propose to use the experience gained in organ transplantation to shed light on the path that shall be followed to evaluate and manage humoral alloreactivity in VCA recipients.

Reduction in donor-specific antibody (DSA) has been associated with improved renal allograft survival after antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). These observations have not been separately analyzed for early and late AMR and mixed acute rejection (MAR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term responses to proteasome inhibitor-based therapy for 4 rejection phenotypes and to determine factors that predict allograft survival.Retrospective cohort study evaluating renal transplant recipients with first AMR episodes treated with proteasome inhibitor-based therapy from January 2005 to July 2015.A total of 108 patients were included in the analysis. Immunodominant DSA reduction at 14 days differed significantly (early AMR 79.6%, early MAR 54.7%, late AMR 23.4%, late MAR 21.1%, P0.001). Death-censored graft survival (DCGS) differed at 3 years postrejection (early AMR 88.3% versus early MAR 77.8% versus late AMR 56.7% versus late MAR 54.9%, P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed that immunodominant DSA reduction50% at 14 days was associated with improved DCGS (odds ratio, 0.12, 95% CI, 0.02-0.52, P = 0.01).In summary, significant differences exist across rejection phenotypes with respect to histological and DSA responses. The data suggest that DSA reduction may be associated with improved DCGS in both early and late AMR.

Current treatments for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplantation are based on low-quality data from a small number of controlled trials. Novel agents targeting B cells, plasma cells, and the complement system have featured in recent studies of AMR.We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials in kidney transplant recipients using Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from inception to February 2017.Of 14 380 citations, we identified 21 studies, including 10 randomized controlled trials, involving 751 participants. Since the last systematic review conducted in 2011, we found nine additional studies evaluating plasmapheresis + intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (two), rituximab (two), bortezomib (two), C1 inhibitor (two), and eculizumab (one). Risk of bias was serious or unclear overall and evidence quality was low for the majority of treatment strategies. Sufficient RCTs for pooled analysis were available only for antibody removal, and here there was no significant difference between groups for graft survival (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.35-1.63; P = 0.475). Studies showed important heterogeneity in treatments, definition of AMR, quality, and follow-up. Plasmapheresis and IVIG were used as standard-of-care in recent studies, and to this combination, rituximab seemed to add little or no benefit. Insufficient data are available to assess the efficacy of bortezomib and complement inhibitors.Newer studies evaluating rituximab showed little or no difference to early graft survival, and the efficacy of bortezomib and complement inhibitors for the treatment of AMR remains unclear. Despite the evidence uncertainty, plasmapheresis and IVIG have become standard-of-care for the treatment of acute AMR.

Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal protein used in various clinical scenarios in kidney transplant recipients. However, its evidence-based use there remains limited due to lack of controlled studies, limited sample size, short follow-up and poorly defined endpoints. Rituximab is indicated for CD20+ posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. It may be beneficial for treating recurrent membranous nephropathy and recurrent allograft antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody vasculitis and possibly for recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Rituximab, in combination with IVIg/plasmapheresis, appears to decrease antibody level and increase the odds of transplantation in sensitized recipients. The role of Rituximab in ABOi transplant remains unclear, as similar outcomes are achieved without its use. Rituximab is not efficacious in antibody-mediated rejection/chronic antibody-mediated rejection. Strict randomized control trials are necessary to elucidate its true role in these settings.

Rituximab is a cornerstone in the regimens of desensitization for ABO-incompatible living-donor liver transplantation (ABO-i LDLT) that makes this modality an acceptable option for liver transplantation. Plasmapheresis (PP) to reduce anti-ABO antibody titer and local infusion (LI) therapy were practiced as the strategies for desensitization before the application of rituximab and were reported as additional treatments. The aim of this study was to clarify the feasibility of monotherapy by rituximab without any additional desensitization treatments in ABO-i LT.Forty patients receiving ABO-i LDLT with rituximab were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the rituximab with pretransplant PP and posttransplant LI (RPL) group (n = 20) and the rituximab monotherapy (RM) without any additional treatment group (n = 20). The groups were then compared in terms of the rates of patient survival, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and infection.The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 85%, 85%, and 85% in the RPL group and 89%, 80%, and 80% in the RM group, respectively. There was no significant difference in patient survival between the 2 groups. There were no episodes of AMR in either group. The RM group had a lower rate of fungal and viral infections than the RPL group.Pretransplant rituximab without additional treatments yielded satisfactory outcomes comparable to that with additional treatments, such as PP and LI.

ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) kidney transplantation (KTx) is an established procedure to expand living donor sources. Although graft and patient survival rates are comparable between ABO-compatible (ABO-C) and ABO-I KTx, several studies have suggested that ABO-I KTx is associated with infection. Additionally, the histological findings and incidence of antibody-mediated rejection under desensitization with rituximab and plasmapheresis remain unclear. We reviewed 327 patients who underwent living-donor KTx without preformed donor-specific antibodies (ABO-C, n = 226; ABO-I, n = 101). Patients who underwent ABO-I KTx received 200 mg/body of rituximab and plasmapheresis, and protocol biopsy (PB) was planned at 3 and 12 months. We compared the PB findings, cumulative incidence of acute rejection in both PBs and indication biopsies, infection, and patient and graft survivals. The 3- and 12-month PBs were performed in 85.0% and 79.2% of the patients, respectively. Subclinical acute rejection occurred in 6.9% and 9.9% of patients in the ABO-C and ABO-I groups at 3 months (P = 0.4) and in 12.4% and 10.1% at 12 months, respectively (P = 0.5). The cumulative incidence of acute rejection determined by both PBs and indication biopsies was 20.5% and 19.6%, respectively (P = 0.8). The degrees of microvascular inflammation and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy were comparable. Polyomavirus BK nephropathy was found in 2.7% and 3.0% of patients in the ABO-C and ABO-I groups, respectively (P = 1.0). The incidence of other infections and the graft/patient survival rates were not different. Analyses using 3- and 12-month PBs suggested comparable allograft pathology between ABO-C and ABO-I KTx under desensitization with low-dose rituximab and plasmapheresis.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. Early diagnosis and treatment of subclinical AMR based on the donor-specific antibody (DSA) testing may result in better outcomes.We tested this hypothesis in 220 kidney transplant recipients who underwent an indication or DSA-based surveillance protocol biopsies between March 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016. Patients were divided into 3 groups: clinical AMR (n = 118), subclinical AMR (n = 25), or no rejection on protocol biopsy (controls; n = 77).Both clinical and subclinical AMR groups underwent similar treatment including plasmapheresis, pulse steroids, IVIG, and rituximab (P = ns). Mean follow-up after AMR was 29.5 ± 16.8 months. There were 2 (3%), 2 (8%), and 54 (46%) death-censored graft failures in the control, subclinical, and clinical AMR groups, respectively (P0.001). Graft outcomes were similar in the subclinical rejection and control groups. In adjusted Cox regression analysis, only clinical rejection (hazards ratio [HR], 4.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-18.94; P = 0.05) and sum chronicity scores (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.35; P = 0.03) were associated with increased risk of graft failure, while estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of biopsy (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99; P = 0.01) was associated with decreased risk of graft failure.Our study suggests that early diagnosis and treatment of subclinical AMR using DSA monitoring may improve outcomes after kidney transplantation.

It is unclear whether all donor-specific antibodies (DSA) can cause chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Subclinical stage before manifestation of renal dysfunction may be a critical period for reversing AMR. The aim of our study was to identify factors related to the development of subclinical AMR and to clarify the characteristics of de novo DSA.Eight hundred ninety-nine renal transplants were screened for HLA antibody. De novo DSA were detected in 95 patients. Forty-three patients without renal dysfunction who underwent renal biopsies were enrolled in this study. Eighteen patients (41.9%) were diagnosed with biopsy-proven subclinical AMR and treated with plasmapheresis and rituximab-based therapy, whereas 25 showed no findings of AMR.Significant subclinical AMR-related factors were younger recipients, history of acute T cell-mediated rejection and DSA class II, especially DR-associated DSA. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of DR-DSA were significantly higher, whereas DQ-DSA was not different between subclinical AMR and no AMR. The ΔMFI (50%), DSA-MFI values greater than 3000, and C1q binding DSA were also significant subclinical AMR-related factors (P0.05). Among 18 patients treated for subclinical AMR, 8 patients (44.4%) obtained over 50% reduction of DSA-MFI and/or improvement or no deterioration of pathological findings. In contrast, 25 patients without subclinical AMR did not show renal dysfunction clinically. Moreover, all of the 8 patients with rebiopsy after 2 years continued to demonstrate no AMR.About 40% of patients with de novo DSA demonstrated biopsy-proven subclinical AMR, leading to progressive graft injury. To validate the intervention and treatment for de novo DSA-positive patients without renal dysfunction, further study is necessary.

Background For desensitization of ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients we recently proposed nonantigen-specific immunoadsorption (IA) and rituximab. Methods We now compared clinical outcomes of 34 ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney recipients who were transplanted using this protocol with that of 68 matched ABO-compatible patients. In addition, we analyzed efficacy and cost of nonantigen-specific as compared to blood group antigen-specific IA. Results Before desensitization, the median isoagglutinin titer of 34 ABO-incompatible patients was 1:64 (Coombs technique). Patients received a median of 7 preoperative IA treatments. Twenty-four patients had a median of 2 additional plasmapheresis treatments to reach the preoperative target isoagglutinin titer of 1:8 or less. After a median postoperative follow-up of 22 months, overall graft survival in the ABO-incompatible group was not significantly different from that in ABO-compatible patients (log-rank P = 0.20), whereas patient survival tended to be lower (log-rank P = 0.05). The incidence of rejection episodes was 15% in both groups. The ABO-incompatible kidney recipients had a higher incidence of BK virus replication (P = 0.04) and nephropathy (P = 0.01) and showed more often colonization with multidrug resistant bacteria (P = 0.02). In comparison to blood group antigen-specific IA, nonantigen-specific IA showed equal efficacy but was associated with reduction in cost. Conclusions Clinical outcomes of ABO-incompatible patients desensitized with a nonantigen-specific IA device and rituximab do not differ from that of matched ABO-compatible patients although a trend toward reduced patient survival was noted. Special attention must be paid to the higher incidence of BK virus infection in recipients of ABO-incompatible grafts.

Treatment of patients with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after kidney transplantation by rituximab and plasmapheresis is ambiguous. Because of its unknown efficiency and serious side effects, biomarkers, which are predictive for responsiveness to this treatment in AMR patients, are required.Twenty renal transplant patients were included in this retrospective study. Selection was based on Renal Index Biopsies, classified according to Banff within 3 months before treatment. Patients were categorized into responders (R) and nonresponders (NR) depending on whether they returned to dialysis within 6 months after initiation of rituximab treatment. Clinical, histopathologic (Banff classification) and serologic parameters were compared between both groups by t test, Mann-Whitney U test, or likelihood ratio chi-square test.In comparisons between the groups, the R group showed a 1.5-fold higher level of estimated glomerular filtration rate and a fourfold lower level of proteinuria. By contrast, there were no differences in the histologic scores for chronic transplant lesions between the groups. The t and i scores were higher in NRs, whereas Banff-C4d scores of peritubular capillaries were increased in the Rs. Transplant biopsies in the Rs exhibited more CD138+ cell infiltrates. Serologic determination of human leukocyte antigen antibodies showed higher positivity for human leukocyte antigen class II donor-specific antibodies in the R group. No significant differences in other clinical criteria were found.Increased proteinuria, decreased graft function, and a higher grade of tubulitis and inflammation in AMR are negative predictors for responsiveness to rituximab therapy. Rituximab therapy therefore should be initiated in an early phase of AMR.

Background Although several strategies for treating early antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplants have been investigated, evidence on treatment of late AMR manifesting after 6 months is sparse. In this single-center series, we present data on 23 consecutive patients treated for late AMR. Methods Late AMR was diagnosed using Banff 2007 criteria along with presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and acute rise in serum creatinine (SCr). Response to therapy was assessed by improvement in SCr, histologic improvement, and decline in DSA strength. Results Overall, 17% (4/23) had documented nonadherence while 69% (16/23) had physician-recommended reduction in immunosuppression before AMR. Eighteen patients (78%) were treated with plasmapheresis or low-dose IVIg+rituximab; 11 (49%) with refractory AMR also received one to three cycles of bortezomib. While there was an improvement (P=0.02) in mean SCr (2.4 mg/dL) at the end of therapy compared with SCr at the time of diagnosis (2.9 mg/dL), this improvement was not sustained at most recent follow-up. Eleven (48%) patients had no histologic resolution on follow-up biopsy. Lack of histologic response was associated with older patients (odds ratio [OR]=3.17; P=0.04), presence of cytotoxic DSA at time of diagnosis (OR=200; P=0.04), and severe chronic vasculopathy (cv≥2) on index biopsy (OR=50; P=0.06). Conclusions A major setting in which late AMR occurred in our cohort was reduction or change in immunosuppression. Our data demonstrate an inadequate response of late AMR to current and novel (bortezomib) therapies. The benefits of therapy need to be counterweighed with potential adverse effects especially in older patients, large antibody loads, and chronic allograft vasculopathy.

BACKGROUND More than 30% of potential kidney transplant recipients have pre-existing anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. This subgroup has significantly lower transplant rates and increased mortality. Desensitization has become an important tool to overcome this immunological barrier. However, limited data is available regarding long-term outcomes, in particular for the highest risk group with a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC XM) before desensitization. METHODS Between 2002 and 2010, 39 patients underwent living-kidney transplantation across a positive CDC XM against their donors at our center. The desensitization protocol involved pretransplant immunosuppression, plasmapheresis, and low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin±rituximab. Measured outcomes included patient survival, graft survival, renal function, rates of rejection, infection, and malignancy. RESULTS The mean and median follow-up was 5.2 years. Patient survival was 95% at 1 year, 95% at 3 years, and 86% at 5 years. Death-censored graft survival was 94% at 1 year, 88% at 3 years, and 84% at 5 years. Uncensored graft survival was 87% at 1 year, 79% at 3 years, and 72% at 5 years. Twenty-four subjects (61%) developed acute antibody-mediated rejection of the allograft and one patient lost her graft because of hyperacute rejection. Infectious complications included pneumonia (17%), BK nephropathy (10%), and CMV disease (5%). Skin cancer was the most prevalent malignancy in 10% of patients. There were no cases of lymphoproliferative disorder. Mean serum creatinine was 1.7±1 mg/dL in functioning grafts at 5 years after transplantation. CONCLUSION Despite high rates of early rejection, desensitization in living-kidney transplantation results in acceptable 5-year patient and graft survival rates.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major risk for renal allograft survival. Throughout decades, cyclophosphamide treatment has been proven to be effective in patients with antibody-associated autoimmune diseases. We investigated whether cyclophosphamide combined with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulins is an option for patients with AMR.Between March 2013 and November 2015, we initiated treatment of 13 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven acute AMR with intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses (15 mg/kg adapted to age and renal function) at 3-week intervals, PPH (6×), and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (1.5 g/kg). Treatment was completed after 6 cyclophosphamide pulses or in case of return to baseline serum creatinine together with reduction of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) below 500 mean fluorescence intensity.Eleven of 13 patients completed treatment. Median follow-up was 18 (12-44) months. At the end of follow-up, graft survival was 77% (10/13). The 3 graft losses were caused at least in part by nonadherence and premature termination of treatment. Serum creatinine increased from 1.7±0.4 mg/dL at 3 months before diagnosis to 3.7±2.4 mg/dL at diagnosis (P = 0.01), and decreased to 2.1 ± 0.7 mg/dL at 3 months after diagnosis (P = 0.01). In 7 (64%) of 11 patients, who completed treatment, DSA decreased, in 4 (36%) of 11 DSA were below 500 mean fluorescence intensity after treatment. Dose reductions had to be performed in 3 of 13 patients for leukopenia. We observed 14 hospitalizations in 9 of 13 patients.To our knowledge, this is the first systematic report on cyclophosphamide-based treatment of acute AMR based on modern diagnostics. Treatment was effective and relatively safe. Future studies will show, whether cyclophosphamide proves to be a valuable alternative for the treatment of AMR.

BACKGROUND Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) recurs after kidney transplantation in more than 30% of cases and can lead to allograft loss. Serum soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is implicated in the pathogenesis of native and recurrent FSGS. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of 25 adults with posttransplantation FSGS. We investigated the relationship between suPAR levels and podocyte changes and the impact of therapy on podocyte structure. We assessed response to therapy by improvement in proteinuria, allograft function, and resolution of histologic changes. RESULTS A median (interquartile range) of 15 (10-23) plasmapheresis sessions was administered; 13 of the subjects also received rituximab. Median pretreatment suPAR levels were higher among those with severe (≥75%) versus those with mild (≤25%) podocyte foot process effacement (13,030 vs. 4806 pg/mL; P=0.02). Overall, mean±SD of proteinuria improved from 5.1±3.8 to 2.1±2.8 mg/dL (P=0.003), mean podocyte effacement decreased from 57%±33% to 22%±22% (P=0.0001), estimated glomerular filtration rates increased from median (interquartile range) of 32.9 (20.6-44.2) to 39.3 (28.8-63.4; P

Excellent short-term results have been reported in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) renal transplant recipients managed solely with antibody removal and conventional immunosuppression. However, long-term clinical outcomes with this regimen and predictive information from protocol biopsies are lacking.We compared outcome data in ABOi and ABO-compatible (ABOc) recipients receiving this regimen approximately 4 years posttransplant, and histology from biopsies approximately 12 months posttransplant.Patient and graft survivals among 54 ABOi recipients were 98.1% and 90.7%, respectively, at 4 years. Graft function was similar between ABOi (creatinine, 140.3 μmol/L) and ABOc recipients (creatinine, 140.2 μmol/L) (P = 0.99), with no significant change over the study period in either group (Δcreatinine, -0.83 vs 6.6 μmol/L) (P = 0.59). There was no transplant glomerulopathy in biopsies from either group. Interstitial fibrosis (IF) and tubular atrophy (TA) was present in 7 (28%) of 25 ABOi compared with 7 (20.6%) of 34 ABOc (P = 0.52). Progression of IF/TA from implantation was noted in 6 (24%) of 25 ABOi and 6 (17.6%) of 34 ABOc, respectively. C4d staining without antibody-mediated rejection was present in 13 (52%) 25 early posttransplant biopsies from ABOi recipients by immunohistochemistry, but in only 4 (16%) of 25 at 12 months.ABO-incompatible renal transplant performed with antibody removal and conventional immunosuppression continues to provide excellent patient and graft survival, and stable renal function over 4 years. Coupled with absent transplant glomerulopathy and low rates of progressive IF/TA on earlier biopsies, this suggests that ABOi with conventional immunosuppression and antibody removal, without rituximab or splenectomy, can achieve long-term outcomes comparable to ABO-compatible transplantation.

Background: Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a recognized cause of allograft loss in kidney transplant recipients. A range of therapies targeting removal of circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), blocking their effect or reducing production have been reported. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of treatments for acute AMR in renal allografts. Electronic databases, reference lists, and conference proceedings were searched for controlled trials. Nonrandomized publications were reviewed for the purpose of discussion. Results: We identified 10,388 citations, including five randomized and seven nonrandomized controlled trials. The randomized studies were small (median, 13 patients/arm; range, 5-23), of which, four examined plasmapheresis (one suggested benefit) and one for immunoadsorption (also suggesting benefit). Marked heterogeneity was evident, including the definition and severity of AMR and the treatment regimen. The end point of graft survival was common to all studies. Small, nonrandomized controlled studies suggested benefit from rituximab or bortezomib. The effects of dose and regimen on the clinical response to any of the current treatments were not apparent from the available data. Conclusions: Data describing the efficacy of treatments for AMR in renal allografts are of low or very low quality. Larger randomized controlled trials and dose-response studies are required.

BACKGROUND ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation performed after desensitization with antigen-specific immunoadsorption (IA) results in good outcomes. However, a unique single-use IA device is required, which creates high costs. METHODS From August 2005 to August 2010, 19 patients were desensitized for ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation. Six patients treated with a single-use antigen-specific IA device and 12 patients treated with a reusable non-antigen-specific IA device were analyzed. RESULTS Six patients who received antigen-specific IA had a median of 5 IA treatments and 12 patients with non-antigen-specific IA had a median of 6 IA treatments preoperatively. Median average titer drop in Coombs technique was 1.2 in antigen-specific IA and 1.7 in non-antigen-specific IA. In two patients with antigen-specific IA and four patients with non-antigen-specific IA, additional plasmapheresis treatments were necessary for recipient desensitization. Despite six treatments with antigen-specific IA and 12 plasmapheresis treatments, one patient with a starting isoagglutinin titer of 1:1024 (Coombs) could not be transplanted. The 18-month graft survival rate for the 17 ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplants was 100%. One male recipient who was desensitized with antigen-specific IA died 44 months after transplantation from sudden cardiac death with a serum creatinine of 1.2 mg/dL. At last follow-up, a median of 13 months after transplantation, median serum creatinine for 16 patients was 1.5 mg/dL, median glomerular filtration rate as estimated by the modification of diet in renal disease formula 54 mL/min/1.73 m, and median urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio 0.1, with no differences between treatments. CONCLUSIONS A reusable non-antigen-specific IA device allows high number of treatments at reasonable cost, and at the same time might deplete human leukocyte antigen-alloantibodies.

Background. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody-incompatible renal transplantation has been increasingly performed since 2000 but with few data on the medium-term outcomes. Methods. Between 2003 and 2011, 84 patients received renal transplants with a pretreatment donor-specific antibody (DSA) level of more than 500 in a microbead assay. Seventeen patients had positive complement-dependent cytotoxic (CDC) crossmatch (XM), 44 had negative CDC XM and positive flow cytometric XM, and 23 had DSA detectable by microbead only. We also reviewed 28 patients with HLA antibodies but no DSA at transplant. DSAs were removed with plasmapheresis pretransplant, and patients did not routinely receive antithymocyte globulin posttransplant. Results. Mean follow-up posttransplantation was 39.6 (range 2-91) months. Patient survival after the first year was 93.8%. Death-censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 97.5%, 94.2%, and 80.4%, respectively, in all DSA+ve patients, worse at 5 years in the CDC+ve than in the CDC-ve/DSA+ve group at 45.6% and 88.6%, respectively (P < 0.03). Five-year graft survival in the DSA+ve group was 82.1%. Rejection occurred in 53.1% of DSA+ve patients in the first year compared with 22% in the DSA+ve patients (P < 0.003). Conclusions. HLA antibody-incompatible renal transplantation had a high success rate if the CDC XM was negative. Further work is required to predict which CDC+ve XM grafts will be successful and to treat slowly progressive graft damage because of DSA in the first few years after transplantation.

Background. Proteasome inhibition abrogates donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (DSA) in patients posttransplant. However, its effects on protective humoral immunity to vaccine antigens remain unknown. Herein, we report on bortezomib's safety regarding protective immunity in patients who have experienced HLA antibody reduction/removal. Methods. Thirteen living donor renal transplant patients were treated with bortezomib one to two cycles (1.3 mg/ m 2 ×4 doses) and plasmapheresis in 2008 to remove HLA antibodies posttransplant. Serial measurements of HLA antibody were conducted weekly before, during, and after treatment by means of single antigen bead on Luminex (One Lambda Inc., Canoga Park, CA). Measles and tetanus toxoid IgGs were measured quantitatively by using ELISA (American Research Products Inc., Belmont, MA). Results. All patients treated with bortezomib/plasmapheresis resulted in a primary DSA reduction of more than 50%. In 10 of 13 patients, complete DSA removal (to below 1000 mean fluorescent intensity) occurred. At 1 year posttreatment, antibody intensity remains significantly depressed in the group as a whole. Despite the significant effect on antibody production, tetanus toxoid and measles IgG levels remained unchanged and above the level of protection at 1 year posttreatment. Conclusion. These data indicate that proteasome inhibitors plus plasmapheresis results in prolonged reduction of HLA antibodies while leaving protective immunity intact.

Backgrounds/Aims Graft survival after ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has increased due to advances in desensitization methods. We analyzed early outcomes following ABOi LDLT using only rituximab without any additional desensitization methods in recipients with low anti-ABO antibody titers (≤1:32). Methods Ten adult patients underwent ABOi LDLT between September 2014 and December 2016. All patients were administered a single dose of rituximab (300 mg/m2) prior to LDLT. Three patients with baseline anti-ABO titer >1:32 underwent multiple sessions of plasmapheresis to reduce titers to

Background This study assesses the immunologic, functional, and histologic course of kidney recipients with preformed donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) receiving deceased donor kidneys according to two prophylactic strategies that have been sequentially applied posttransplant. Methods The first strategy combined posttransplant quadritherapy/intravenous immunoglobulin (group 1, n=36) and the second added to the above protocol anti-CD20/plasmapheresis (group 2, n=18). All patients had a concomitant evaluation of glomerular filtration rate, protocol biopsies, and DSA mean intensity of fluorescence (MFI) at 3 month and 1 year posttransplant. Results Peak and day-0 class-I or II DSAmax-MFI were similar in both groups. The rate of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was similar in both groups (19.6% vs. 16.6%, respectively). At 1 year posttransplant, group 2 was characterized by lower microcirculation inflammation lesions (glomerulitis+capilaritis score of 1.8+/-0.2 vs. 2.7+/-0.2, respectively, P=0.03), a lower rate of transplant glomerulopathy (7% vs. 38%, P=0.02), and a lower rate of chronic AMR (41.3% vs. 13.3%, respectively, P=0.03). The decline in DSA-MFI from day 0 to 1 year was 44%+/-13% in group 1 compared with 80%+/-8% in group 2 (P=0.02). Finally, the 1-year glomerular filtration rate was 43+/-16 vs. 54+/-16 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.04). Conclusion This study raises the possibility that a more intensive day 0 prophylactic immunosuppressive strategy combining intravenous immunoglobulin/anti-CD20/plasmapheresis in this high-risk population, despite similar rates of early acute clinical humoral rejection, is associated with significant differences in long-term function and chronic AMR rate. Future prospective randomized studies are needed to assess the best strategies to be applied in light of the pretransplant immunologic risk stratification.

Background. The common endpoint in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is functional reversal (creatinine levels). Reduction of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody strength is not commonly considered as an essential endpoint for AMR resolution. The purpose of this study was to determine whether reduction in HLA antibody intensity in patients with histologic AMR reversal influences long-term renal allograft survival. Methods. Renal allograft recipients were included if he or she had a biopsy diagnosis of AMR (between August 2000 and October 2008) and serial evaluation for HLA antibodies prebiopsy and postbiopsy. Antibody reduction was defined as mean fluorescence intensity decrease more than 50% in highest intensity antibody after AMR therapy and the absence of new antibody formation. Patients were treated with plasmapheresis, thymoglobulin/OKT3, and corticosteroids. Survival analysis was performed using STATA/MP v10 (College Station, TX). Results. Twenty-eight patients were analyzed. Antibody reduction failed to occur in 22 of 28 cases. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Antibody nonresponders had significantly shorter allograft survival time (61.4 months) compared with antibody responders (no failures) (P=0.04, log-rank test). Conclusions. In conclusion, failure to significantly reduce antibody levels and prevent new formation was strongly predictive of allograft loss. This observation suggests that the therapeutic intervention that reduces antibody production may prolong graft survival in transplantation.

Background Rapid and complete elimination of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) during antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is rarely achieved with traditional antihumoral therapies. Proteasome inhibitor-based therapy has been shown to effectively treat refractory AMR, but its use as a primary therapy for AMR has not been presented. Our initial experience with proteasome inhibition as a first-line therapy for AMR is presented. Methods Adult kidney transplant recipients with AMR, diagnosed by Banff criteria, received a bortezomib-based regimen as the primary therapy. Bortezomib therapy was administered per package insert with plasmapheresis performed immediately before each bortezomib dose, and a single rituximab dose (375 mg/m2) given with the first bortezomib dose. DSA were quantitated using single-antigen beads on a Luminex platform. Results Two patients underwent bortezomib-based therapy for acute AMR occurring within the first 2 weeks after transplantation. High DSA levels and positive C4d staining of peritubular or glomerular capillaries were present at the time of diagnosis. Both patients experienced prompt AMR reversal and elimination of detectable DSA within 14 days of bortezomib-based therapy. Renal function remains excellent with normal urinary protein excretion at 5 and 6 months after AMR diagnosis. One patient experienced a repeated elevation of DSA (including two new human leukocyte antigen specificities) 2 months after initial bortezomib therapy, but without C4d deposition or histologic evidence of AMR. Retreatment with bortezomib provided prompt, complete, and durable DSA elimination. Conclusions Proteasome inhibitor-based combination therapy provides a potential means for rapid DSA elimination in early acute AMR in renal transplant recipients.

Background Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) accounts for more than 10% of all cases of renal diseases leading to renal failure in children. After renal transplantation, 20% to 40% of FSGS relapse, frequently leading to renal loss.Plasmapheresis is considered the first option to treat relapses by several authors but is often ineffective. The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has been proposed as a possible treatment. Methods We reviewed the effect of rituximab in seven children or young adults with pretransplant FSGS and relapse of proteinuria after transplantation who did not respond to intensive plasmapheresis. Results After treatment, urine protein disappeared in three patients, was reduced by 70% in one patient and by 50% in one patient. No response was observed in one patient who had a quick deterioration of renal function and reached end-stage renal failure after 3 months. One additional patient developed a severe reaction a few minutes after the start of the first rituximab infusion. Conclusion Rituximab is a possible option to treat some resistant cases of FSGS with relapsing proteinuria after transplantation. It is important that therapy is started early after evidence of failure of plasmapheresis, before sclerosis develops in the glomeruli. The response to treatment can occur after several months. During the follow-up period, CD19 cells should be monitored carefully, and additional rituximab infusions considered to maintain B-cell depletion.

Background. Current treatments for autoantibody-mediated diseases (i.e., systemic lupus erythematosus) and alloantibodies (in transplant) are minimally effective. Although they deplete naive B cells, plasmablasts, and transiently reduce antibody concentrations, they are minimally effective against long-lived, antibody-producing plasma cells. In transplantation, plasma cells produce antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens causing poor allograft survival. We report the first clinical experience with a plasma cell depleting therapy, bortezomib, to abrogate anti-HLA antibodies in transplantation (outside of rejection) in an attempt to improve long-term allograft survival. Methods. Eleven patients with anti-HLA alloantibodies were treated with bortezomib. All patients underwent plasmapheresis to aid in removal of antibodies and to determine the effect of bortezomib. Serial measurements of anti-HLA antibody levels were conducted weekly by single antigen bead on Luminex platform. Results. Bortezomib treatment elicited substantial reduction in both donor-specific antibody (DSA) and non-DSA levels. Antibodies were directed against DSA in 8 of 11 cases. Mean time to antibody appearance was 2 months posttransplant. Within 22 days (median) from treatment initiation, 9 of 11 patients’ antibody levels dropped to less than 1000 mean fluorescence intensity. Of two patients without successful depletion, all had peak mean fluorescence intensity more than 10,000. At a mean follow-up of approximately 4 months posttreatment, all patients have stable graft function. Minimal transient side effects were noticed with bortezomib in the form of gastrointestinal toxicity, thrombocytopenia, and paresthesias. Conclusions. Bortezomib therapy effectively abrogates anti-HLA antibodies. Hence, removal of antibodies, by proteasome inhibition, represents a new treatment strategy for transplantation and may have benefit in autoimmune-related disease.

The requirements for potent immunosuppression coupled with the formidable risk of irreversible antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) have thus far limited the expansion of ABO incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation. We present a retrospective review of our single-center experience with 60 consecutive ABOi kidney transplants and describe the evolution of our treatment protocol to one that consists only of a brief escalation in immunosuppression without long-term B-cell suppression from splenectomy or anti-CD20. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates for the cohort were 98.3%, 92.9%, and 88.7%, respectively, which is comparable with United Network for Organ Sharing data for compatible live donor transplants. No instances of hyperacute rejection were observed, and no grafts were lost secondary to AMR. In fact, fewer than 15% of the patients experienced a clinical episode of AMR, and rejections were mild. Elimination of B-cell ablative therapies did not result in an increased incidence of AMR. Excellent graft function persists with a current median creatinine clearance of 60 mL/min. The findings of this study and the relatively simple therapeutic regimen used should facilitate widespread application of ABOi kidney transplantation resulting in one of the most rapid escalations in access to organs in the modern era of kidney transplantation.

Background To increase living donation for kidney transplantation, we investigated desensitization of recipients with positive crossmatch against a potential living donor. Methods Between June 2001 and March 2007, 57 consecutive sensitized candidates for kidney transplantation, with crossmatch positive potential living donors, were treated with various desensitization protocols. All patients received plasmapheresis every other day with intravenous immune globulin 100 mg/kg starting 1 week before the scheduled transplant. Postoperatively, the recipients continued to receive every other day plasmapheresis with intravenous immune globulin for the initial week. Immunosuppression therapy consisted of induction with thymoglobulin and a combination of tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and corticosteroids. Results Six patients failed to convert with pretransplant immunomodulation and were not transplanted; 51 underwent live donor kidney transplant. Mean follow-up was 23 months and 36 patients have more than 1-year follow-up. One-year patient and graft survivals were 95% and 93%, respectively. There were 25 episodes of biopsy-proven or clinically presumed rejection in 22 patients in the first year. Of the 17 biopsy-proven episodes, 12 were antibody-mediated rejection and five were acute cellular rejection. Of the patients with antibody-mediated rejection (biopsy proven or empiric), two patients (12%) lost their graft by 1 year. The median modification of diet in renal disease at 6 and 12 months was 55 mL/min (range 9-104 mL/min) and 48 mL/min (range 8-99), respectively. Conclusions Despite increased rejection rates, graft and patient survivals indicate that desensitization of positive crossmatch patients is a reasonable alternative for a sensitized patient who could potentially wait 10 or more years for a suitable cadaveric kidney.

Since 1989, when we performed the first ABO-incompatible living-related kidney transplantation (ABO-ILKT) in Japan, many Japanese institutions have started their own ABO-ILKT programs. By the end of 2005, 851 ABO-ILKTs had been performed in Japan at 82 institutions. In the present study, we review the surveillance data of the Japanese ABO-Incompatible Transplantation Committee and our own, recent experience of ABO-ILKT. One-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival has been 95%, 92%, 90%, and 85%, respectively, whereas 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival has been 89%, 85%, 79%, and 61%, respectively. Between 1989 and 1999, a triplicate immunosuppressive regimen consisting of tacrolimus or cyclosporine A plus azathioprine or mizoribine plus methylprednisolone was administered at most institutions. Between 2000 and 2004, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone were used at most of the institutions. Splenectomy was performed in most recipients between 1989 and 2004. Recently, many institutions started to use anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab) as an alternative to splenectomy. In most cases, ABO-ILKT recipients underwent 3 or 4 sessions of plasmapheresis or double-filtration plasmapheresis before transplantation. A greater incidence of acute rejection was observed during the cyclosporine A era, but the incidence of rejection was markedly reduced in the tacrolimus era. Anti-CD20 antibody induction markedly reduced the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection and greatly improved the results. In conclusion, there were significant differences in graft survival and the incidence of rejection before and after the introduction of tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil. In addition, rituximab as an alternative to splenectomy is definitely an effective regimen for successful ABO-ILKT.

Background. Accommodation to antibody is an important mechanism in successful ABO-incompatible transplantation, but its importance in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody-incompatible transplantation is less clear, as sensitive techniques facilitating daily measurement of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) have only recently been developed. Methods. We report 24 patients who had HLA antibody-incompatible kidney transplantation (21 living donors, 3 deceased), 21 of whom had pretransplant plasmapheresis. Eight had positive complement-dependent cytotoxic (CDC) crossmatch (XM) pretransplant plasmapheresis, nine had positive flow cytometric (FC) XM, and seven had DSA detectable by microbead analysis only. After transplant, DSA levels were monitored closely with microbead assays. Results. Rejection occurred in five of eight (62.5%) CDC-positive cases, in three of nine (33%) FC-positive cases, and in two of seven (29%) of microbead-only cases at a median of 6.5 days after transplantation. Resolution occurred at a median of 15 days after transplantation, in 8 of 10 cases when the microbead level of DSA had median fluorescence intensity (MFI) > 2000 U, in 6 of 10 when the microbead MFI > 4000 U. In 8 of 10 cases, the microbead MFI at the time of resolution was greater than at the onset. DSA did not always cause clinical rejection. In five cases with a posttransplant DSA peaking at MFI > 2000 U on microbead assay, rejection did not occur. Conclusion. These data suggest that the dominant method of successful transplantation was function of the transplant in the presence of circulating DSA, and they also define the period during which this occurred.

Background Histology remains a cornerstone for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) diagnosis. Little data exist supporting histology for assessing therapeutic responses. This study evaluates histologic components in assessing AMR therapeutic responses. Methods Antibody-mediated rejection was diagnosed using Antibody Working Group criteria and Banff component scoring, and C4d staining data were analyzed. Statistics included independent and paired samples t test, χ(2), Fisher exact, or the Wilcoxon-signed rank test. Fifty-five AMR patients were analyzed. Early AMR was defined as occurring within 6 months after transplantation and treated with a single rituximab dose and 4 bortezomib doses preceded by plasmapheresis. Allograft biopsies were performed within 48 hours of treatment; repeat biopsy was performed 14 to 21 days later. Results Early AMR demonstrated histologic improvement in mean scores for acute Banff components glomerulitis (g), C4d, g+ peritubular capillaritis (ptc) and acute composite score, but showed deterioration in chronic Banff components tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. Late AMR showed improved mean scores for acute Banff components tubulitis, interstitial inflammation, g, ptc, g + ptc, C4d, and acute composite score, but chronic scores did not change. Significant changes in distribution of Banff scores after treatment were observed for g, C4d, tubular atrophy, and interstitial fibrosis scores in early AMR patients and tubulitis, interstitial inflammation, g, ptc, and C4d in late AMR. Conclusions These results show that: (1) Banff component scoring provides insights into histologic responses to AMR therapy and may provide a potential endpoint for clinical AMR trials. (2) Early and late AMR demonstrate differences in acute and chronic Banff components at the time of the AMR diagnostic biopsy, as well as differential responses to AMR therapy.

Background Perioperative treatment with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), combined with a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen, has been used successfully to allow renal transplantations in cross-match-positive recipients. A common finding in biopsy specimens of these allografts is isometric vacuolization of proximal tubular epithelium. This finding presents a diagnostic dilemma because it may occur secondary to IVIG treatment or tacrolimus nephrotoxicity. Methods We compared the frequency and severity of isometric tubular vacuolization in renal allograft biopsy specimens obtained during the first 10 days after transplantation in 24 patients who received one or more postoperative treatments with IVIG (100 mg/kg; as part of a desensitization protocol also involving plasmapheresis) with specimens obtained in 91 patients who did not receive IVIG. All patients received tacrolimus. Isometric vacuolization was graded on a 0 to 4 scale based on the fraction of proximal tubules involved: 0, none; 1, less than 10%; 2, 10% to 25%; 3, 26% to 50%; 4, more than 50%. Results There was a higher frequency of isometric tubular vacuolization (71 % vs. 31%) and more widespread involvement in patients who received IVIG and tacrolimus versus tacrolimus alone, although mean tacrolimus levels were not significantly different between these groups. In control, but not IVIG, biopsy specimens, there was a significant association between vacuolization score and blood tacrolimus level on the day of biopsy. Conclusions Isometric tubular vacuolization is a common finding in renal transplant biopsy specimens of patients who receive low-dose IVIG and in many cases is likely to be related, at least in part, to IVIG. In these patients, this finding should not necessarily be interpreted as indicative of tacrolimus (or cyclosporine) nephrotoxicity.

BACKGROUND : Desensitization protocols have been developed to allow successful kidney transplantation in sensitized recipients. However, a detailed analysis of the impact of these protocols on alloantibody has not been performed. METHODS : We studied 12 living-donor kidney-transplant recipients with positive antihuman globulin-enhanced complement dependent cytotoxicity (AHG-CDC) crossmatches against their donors. Using a variety of crossmatch techniques and single-antigen flowbeads (SAFBs), we characterized the specificity and amount of alloantibody at baseline before desensitization, after desensitization (using plasmapheresis followed by 100 mg/kg intravenous immunoglobulin, and anti-CD20 antibody), and 4 months after transplantation (after splenectomy and on maintenance immunosuppression). RESULTS : All 12 patients with a positive baseline AHG-CDC crossmatch were AHG-CDC crossmatch negative at the time of transplant (after desensitization). However, despite desensitization, the majority of patients had low-level donor-specific alloantibodies demonstrable on the day of transplantation by both flow crossmatch (FXM 8/12) and SAFBs (10/11). Four months after transplantation, no patient had a positive AHG-CDC crossmatch, but again the majority had persistent low levels of donor-specific alloantibodies by FXM (6/12) and SAFBs (9/11). No patient experienced hyperacute rejection, and the persistence of low levels of donor-specific alloantibodies did not correlate with the development of humoral rejection in the early posttransplant period. CONCLUSIONS : Despite desensitization, a majority of positive crossmatch transplant recipients demonstrate low levels of donor-specific alloantibodies both on the day of transplant and 4 months after transplantation. The impact of these antibodies appears to be minimal early after transplant, but their long-term significance bears further study.

Alloantibody-mediated acute rejection is a major cause of renal allograft loss despite aggressive therapy. Patients with humoral rejection can be identified with high sensitivity and specificity by the presence of peritubular capillary C4d staining on renal biopsy and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. Standard therapy for acute humoral rejection (AHR) has been removal of donor-specific antibodies by plasmapheresis (PPH) in conjunction with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. We describe a series of seven patients with C4d positive AHR who received combined therapy with PPH and polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG).PPH (1.4 volume exchange) was initiated on diagnosis of AHR on an alternate day basis for a mean number of 6.8 treatments, in conjunction with rATG (0.75 mg/kg/day 5-10 days) until the serum creatinine returned to 120% of nadir.The nadir posttreatment creatinine was significantly lower than pretreatment creatinine (1.0+/-1.2 vs. 2+/-1.4, P0.007) with only one episode of graft loss. On follow-up there was no difference in renal allograft survival between the AHR group and the 60 patients without AHR who underwent transplantation during the same period. We describe the ability of rATG to induce apoptosis in vitro peripheral blood and activated B cells.Combination therapy using PPH and rATG is an effective means of reversing AHR in renal allografts.

Background. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Thymoglobulin and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy on the clinical outcome of a putatively high-risk group of kidney transplant recipients who have positive B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) along with positive T- or B-cell flow cytometry (FC) crossmatch results. Methods. We prospectively studied the effects of IVIG and Thymoglobulin induction treatment in B-cell CDC, and T- or B-cell FC crossmatch-positive kidney transplant recipients (seven women and one man; mean age, 43±12 years). Results. Mean peak panel-reactive antibody (PRA) was 47±32. Three patients had donor-specific antibody by flow PRA (two anti-DR4 and one anti-A2). Each recipient received induction treatment with IVIG 100 mg/kg for 3 days and Thymoglobulin 1.5 mg/kg for 5 days after transplantation. No acute cellular rejections occurred during a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 12–17 months). Only one acute humoral rejection occurred 8 days after transplantation, which responded to plasmapheresis, IVIG, and rituximab. One allograft was lost because of polyoma nephritis. Patient survival was 100% and allograft survival was 88%. Conclusion. Our results indicate that IVIG and Thymoglobulin induction treatment may facilitate kidney transplantation in B-cell CDC and T- or B-cell FC crossmatch-positive patients.

Background Acute humoral rejection (AHR) has been associated with enhanced graft loss. Our study compared the renal allograft survival of patients with AHR treated with plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) with allograft survival in patients with acute cellular rejection (ACR). Methods. We retrospectively analyzed all kidney transplants performed at our institution between January 1999 and August 2001 (n=286). Recipients were classified into three groups according to biopsy reports: AHR, ACR, or no rejection. The ACR group was further divided into early and late rejection ( 90 days posttransplant, respectively). Results. After a mean follow-up of 569±19 days, the incidence of AHR was 5.6% (n=16). Recipient presensitization, delayed graft function, early rejection, and higher creatinine at diagnosis were characteristic of AHR. Most AHR patients (14/16) were treated with PP and IVIG. One patient received only IVIG, whereas another received only PP. All AHR patients were given steroid pulses, but only four received antilymphocyte therapy because of concomitant severe ACR. The ACR group comprised 43 patients (15%). One patient with mild rejection received no therapy, 20 improved with steroids alone, and 22 required additional antilymphocyte therapy. One-year graft survival by Kaplan Meier analysis was 81% and 84% in the AHR and ACR groups, respectively (P=NS). Outcomes remained similar when AHR patients were compared with those with early ACR. Conclusions. We conclude that AHR, when diagnosed early and treated aggressively with PP and IVIG, carries a short-term prognosis that is similar to ACR.

Background. Given the scarcity of cadaveric organs, efforts are intensifying to increase the availability of living donors. The current study assessed the feasibility of using ABO-incompatible living-donor kidneys to expand the donor pool. Methods. The authors performed 18 ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplants between May 1999 and April 2001. Ten patients received living-donor kidneys from A2 and eight patients received kidneys from non-A2 blood group donors. Immunosuppression consisted of Thymoglobulin antibody induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Eight non-A2 and two A2 kidney recipients also received a pretransplant conditioning regimen of four plasmapheresis treatments followed by intravenous immunoglobulin and splenectomy at the time of transplantation. Antidonor blood group antibody titer was measured at baseline, pretransplant, at 1- to 3-month and 1-year follow-up, and at the time of diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection. Results. No hyperacute rejection episodes occurred. One-year graft and patient survival rates in the 18 ABO-incompatible recipients were only slightly lower than those of 81 patients who received ABO-compatible kidney transplants during the same period (89% vs. 96% and 94% vs. 99%, respectively). Glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine levels did not differ between the groups. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in 28% of ABO-incompatible recipients, and was reversible with plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and increasing immunosuppression in all patients except one. Conclusions. ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplants can achieve an acceptable 1-year graft survival rate using an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of Thymoglobulin induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone combined with pretransplant plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and splenectomy.

Background. ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations require the anti-ABO antibody titer to be reduced to below 1:16 before transplantation. To achieve this, preoperative plasma exchange or double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is usually performed. We report a case of an ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in which preoperative DFPP failed to reduce the anti-ABO antibody titer to below 1:16. In this case, the kidney transplantation was performed after the completion of a preconditioning regimen consisting of infusions of an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab), DFPP, and a splenectomy. Methods and Results. The patient was a 22-year-old man with Alport syndrome, who had been receiving dialysis treatment for 17 months. Because the patient's blood type was O, and the donor's was A (Al), three sessions of DFPP were performed 2 months before the kidney transplantation. However, the patient's anti-A antibody titer did not drop to below 1:16, so the kidney transplantation was postponed. To enable the ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation to proceed, the following protocol was applied. Rituximab was infused weekly at a dose of 375 mg/m 2 for 4 weeks. After the first rituximab infusion, the CD19+ B cell count rapidly decreased to below 1% in the peripheral blood. Two days after the fourth rituximab infusion, splenectomy was performed. After the splenectomy, four sessions of DFPP were performed. During the course of DFPP treatment, the anti-A antibody titer gradually decreased and was below 1:16 on the day of the transplantation. The kidney transplantation was performed by the standard method. The kidney allograft was performed immediately after the transplantation. No signs of humoral rejection were observed after revascularization. After the operation, the patient showed no signs of humoral rejection, and his serum creatinine levels were between 1.7 and 2.0 mg/dL. The anti-A antibody titer remained below 1:16 throughout the recovery period. A biopsy specimen obtained on postoperative day 12 showed no evidence of antibody-mediated rejection. After 3 months of follow-up, the kidney allograft continued to function well. Conclusion. A preconditioning regimen consisting of rituximab infusions and a splenectomy is a useful new strategy for performing ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations when the conventional preconditioning regimen does not work.

Background. Deposition of C4d in peritubular capillaries (PTCs) has been shown to be a sensitive marker for antibody-mediated (humoral) rejection in renal transplant biopsies. Some studies also suggest that C4d in PTCs is specific for humoral rejection or, at least, for the presence of donor-specific antibodies. However, in other studies, PTC C4d deposits were noted in more than 40% of renal transplant biopsies performed for graft dysfunction and capillary C4d deposition in heart transplants may result from ischemic injury. Methods. To test the specificity of C4d staining as a marker for acute humoral rejection ACR in renal allografts, indirect immunofluorescence using a monoclonal anti-C4d antibody and a fluorescein-isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody was performed on cryostat sections of 90 renal transplant biopsies, including 35 pairs of preimplantation and 1-hr postreperfusion biopsies of the same graft, postreperfusion biopsies of 12 additional grafts, and 8 positive controls (biopsies with known C4d-positive AHR). Eighteen grafts were cadaveric, 17 grafts were liviing-related, and 12 grafts were living-unrelated (excluding controls). Included in these grafts were 13 grafts that developed AHR 3 to 34 days posttransplantation. Results. Only 2 of 82 perioperative biopsies showed C4d staining in PTCs. Both perioperative biopsies were postreperfusion biopsies of grafts diagnosed with AHR 5 and 34 days posttransplantation, respectively, and, in each case, the recipient had been treated with plasmapheresis before transplantation because of a positive crossmatch (cytotoxic and flow cytometric) and continued to have a weakly positive flow crossmatch at the time of transplantation. In one biopsy, C4d staining was focal, and in the other biopsy, it was diffuse; in both biopsies, C4d staining was relatively mild (1+ on a 0-4+ scale). No C4d staining was noted on preimplantation biopsies of each graft. All biopsies that contained glomeruli showed linear capillary loop or blotchy mesangial staining, or both, which was similar in prereperfusion and postreperfusion biopsies. All positive controls showed diffuse C4d staining in PTCs. Conclusions. C4d staining in PTCs may be seen as early as 1 hr posttransplantation in some recipients with low levels of antidonor antibodies. However, this was not observed as a feature of ischemic or ischemia-reperfusion injury in perioperative renal transplant biopsies, including those of cadaveric grafts with cold ischemia times of as long as 41 hr.

Objective We sought to examine factors that predisposed 1.5% (10/672) of renal transplant recipients treated with a cyclosporine (CsA)/sirolimus (SRL)/steroid immunosuppressive regimen to develop hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Methods Two cohorts of recipients were treated for 1-212 months (mean: 25.0+/-26.4, median: 18.1) with concentration-control CsA regimens based upon either area under the concentration-time curve (AUC; n=412 patients) or trough measurements (C0; n=260 patients). Results The only demographic feature more common to affected patients was an original glomerulopathic disease in 7 patients, 4 of whom had displayed IgA glomerulonephritis. All 10 affected patients showed a clinical picture of hemolysis with schistocytes, thrombocytopenia (nadir: 35,000+/-19,600 platelets/mm3), as well as elevated serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (1697+/-1427 IU) and creatinine (Scr; 2.05+/-1.52 mg/dL prediagnosis to 5.13+/-2.43 mg/dL at diagnosis). Seven patients experienced adverse events concomitant with the bout of HUS, namely, acute rejection episodes prior to (n=2) or during (n=3), and 2 patients, infections (Herpes simplex and pancolitis). The mean values of daily steroid dose and the immunosuppressive drug C0 values were above the putative therapeutic targets: namely, CsA C0=294.9+/-153.2 ng/ml versus 150+/-50 ng/ml and SRL C0=20.1+/-14.0 ng/ml versus 10+/-5 ng/ml, respectively. The therapeutic approach included discontinuation of CsA in 9/10, which was transient in 6/9; discontinuation of SRL in all 10, which was transient in 3, OKT3 for concurrent rejection in 3, and plasmapheresis in 5 patients. At 24 weeks postdiagnosis 9/10 patients have well-functioning kidneys with a mean Scr value of 1.6+/-0.59 mg/dL. One patient who underwent transplant nephrectomy subsequently succumbed due to a cluster of refractory thrombocytopenia, Aspergillus infection, and multiorgan failure. Conclusion This initial experience suggests that a time-limited and reversible de novo HUS syndrome may be less frequent and milder among renal transplant recipients treated with SRL-based immunosuppression.

Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) is characterized by a deficiency of ferrochelatase the final enzyme of the heme biosynthetic pathway. Patients with EPP may overproduce protoporphyrin IX, chiefly in developing erythrocytes. In some, protoporphyrin accumulates and causes toxicity, particularly to the skin and liver. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) treats the severe liver disease that sometimes occurs in EPP; however, it does not correct the underlying metabolic disorder. We recently reported a patient with EPP who was improved with plasmapheresis and i.v. heme-albumin before OLT. Subsequently he developed histological and biochemical evidence of recurrent hepatotoxicity from protoporphyrin in the graft liver. We now report successful treatment of the patient with additional plasmapheresis and heme-albumin with improvement of hepatic histological and biochemical abnormalities. We conclude that plasmapheresis and heme-albumin are of benefit in EPP complicated by hepatotoxicity before and after liver transplantation.

Background. Recurrent focal segmental glomerulo-sclerosis (FSGS) is heralded by proteinuria that may remit after treatment with plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption. Study of recurrent FSGS has been hampered by lack of an animal model that exhibits a pattern of proteinuria that mimics human disease. We have obtained a component of FSGS patient plasma (FSGS factor) that increases glomerular albumin permeability (P alb ) in vitro and causes transient proteinuria in vivo. Methods. Plasma fractions containing FSGS factor and comparable plasma fractions from normal donors were injected into normal male Sprague-Dawley rats. Urinary protein, albumin, and creatinine were measured at various time points. Additionally, plasma samples from test animals were collected after injection and tested for FS activity defined by increased P alb . Finally, glomeruli were isolated from animals after injection and P alb of these glomeruli tested. Results. Proteinuria and albuminuria were increased by 24 hr after injection with FSGS factor, and returned to baseline by 48 hr after injection. Injection with the same fraction of normal plasma had no effect on urinary protein. FSGS factor increased urinary protein in a dose-dependent manner. Serum collected from rats 15 or 60 min after injection with FSGS factor increased P alb of glomeruli in vitro, whereas serum collected 3 or more hours after injection had no effect. Glomeruli isolated from rats receiving injections with FSGS factor had increased in vitro P alb compared with glomeruli from rats injected with a fraction from normal plasma. Conclusions. We have demonstrated that a single injection of FSGS factor increases P alb and, causes transient albuminuria and proteinuria in rats. FS activity in the plasma of recipient rats is also transient. This is the first detailed description of the time course and dose-dependence of proteinuria caused by FSGS factor in an animal model.