Search

Infections with double-stranded DNA viruses are a common complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and cause significant morbidity and mortality in the post-transplantation period. Both donor-derived (DD) and third-party (TP) virus-specific T cells (VSTs) have shown efficacy and safety in viral management following HSCT in children and young adults. Owing to a greater degree of HLA matching between the recipient and stem cell donor, DD VSTs potentially persist longer in circulation compared to TP VSTs, because they are collected from a well-matched donor. However, TP VSTs are more easily accessible, particularly for smaller transplantation centers that do not have VST manufacturing capabilities, and more economical than creating a customized product for each transplant recipient. We conducted the present study to compare clinical efficacy and safety outcomes for DD VSTs and TP VSTs in a large cohort of pediatric and young adult HSCT recipients and to determine whether DD VSTs are associated with improved outcomes owing to potentially longer persistence in the recipient's circulation. This retrospective cohort study included 145 patients who received VSTs at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) between 2017 and 2021 for the treatment of adenovirus, BK virus, cytomegalovirus, and/or Epstein-Barr virus. Viruses were detected using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Patients received VSTs on a DD (NCT02048332) or TP (NCT02532452) protocol, and VST products for both protocols were manufactured in an identical fashion. The primary study outcome was clinical response to VSTs, evaluated 4 weeks after VST administration, defined as decrease in viral load to under the inclusion thresholds, or resolution of symptoms of invasive viral infection, without the need for additional conventional antiviral medication following VST administration. Secondary outcomes included graft-versus-host-disease, transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy, renal function, hospital length of stay, and overall survival at 30 days and 100 days after VST administration and 1 year after HSCT. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test or chi-square test. An unpaired t test was used to compare continuous variables. The study group comprised 77 patients in the DD cohort and 68 patients in the TP cohort. Eighteen patients in the TP cohort underwent HSCT at CCHMC, and the other 50 underwent HSCT at other institutions and presented to CCHMC solely for VST administration. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical response rates between DD and TP cohorts (65.6% versus 62.7%; odds ratio [OR], 1.162; 95% confidence interval [CI], .619 to 2.164; P = .747). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the 2 cohorts. The percentage of patients requiring multiple infusions for a clinical response did not differ significantly between the DD and TP cohorts (38.2% versus 32.5%; OR, .780; 95% CI, .345 to 1.805; P = .666). We found no significant difference in clinical response rate between DD VSTs and TP VSTs and a similar safety profile. Our data suggest that TP VSTs may be sufficient to control viral infection until immune reconstitution occurs despite the potential for more rapid VST clearance compared to DD VSTs. The lack of significant differences between DD VSTs and TP VSTs is an important finding, indicating that it is not necessary for every transplant center to manufacture customized DD VSTs, and that TP VSTs are a satisfactory substitute., (Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Bridging therapy (BT) given during the period between T-cell collection and initiation of lymphodepleting chemotherapy is indicated for most children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) undergoing treatment with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. Both conventional chemotherapy agents and B-cell directed antibody-based therapies such as antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific T-cell engagers have been used as systemic forms of BT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate if there are detectable differences in clinical outcomes based on the type of BT given (conventional chemotherapy or inotuzumab). A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients treated with tisa-cel at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center for B-ALL with bone marrow disease (with or without extramedullary disease). Patients who did not receive systemic BT were excluded. Only 1 patient received blinatumomab as BT and was therefore not included in this analysis to focus the analysis on the use of inotuzumab. Pre-infusion characteristics and post-infusion outcomes were collected. Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables, and t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous parametric and non-parametric variables respectively. Mantel-Cox was used for survival analyses. Thirty-two patients received BT before CD19 CAR-T for medullary leukemia; 24 received conventional chemotherapy, and 8 received inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO). Cohorts were evenly matched regarding CAR-T indication, recipient age, and median CAR-T cell dose. There were no significant differences between the groups for attaining a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response after CAR-T, the percentage of patients who maintained prolonged B-cell aplasia, or the median duration of B-cell aplasia. Thirty-seven percent of patients in the conventional chemotherapy group and 43% in the antibody-based therapy group relapsed, with a median time to relapse in both groups of 5 months. No differences in event-free survival, the cumulative incidence of relapse, or overall survival were seen between the two groups. Initial response to tisa-cel, relapse rate, and survival were similar between patients who received BT with conventional chemotherapy or InO therapy. Because low disease burden at the time of infusion is a positive prognostic factor, choice of bridging regimen should focus on therapy that is anticipated to effectively lower disease burden and minimize treatment-related toxicity. Given the limitations associated with the single center retrospective analysis, a larger, multicenter study is needed to further explore these findings., (Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a progressive and generally fatal demyelinating neurologic disease that occurs in profoundly immunocompromised patients due to infection with the human polyomavirus JC virus (JCPyV). Treatment options are limited and are largely focused on restoring T cell immunity, and outcomes are historically poor. Control of JCPyV in the setting of an immunocompromised patient by adoptive transfer of third-party virus specific T cells (VSTs) has been described in a small number of cases. To investigate treatment response and outcomes in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with PML treated with third-party VSTs directed against the BK virus, a highly homologous polyoma virus that shares immunogenic epitopes with JCPyV. A retrospective chart review was performed on 4 patients who received VSTs for the treatment of PML at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center since 2019. VSTs were administered safely, with no cases of graft-versus-host disease and no infusion reactions. One patient who was treated almost immediately after diagnosis was able to clear JCPyV from blood and cerebrospinal fluid, with resultant stabilization of neurologic decline. IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) analysis demonstrated VSTs in the peripheral blood following infusion. Response was maintained through repeat infusions. Three other patients, all of whom had a longer delay between diagnosis and infusion, exhibited progressive neurologic decline despite varying degrees of improvement in viral load. PML is a rare but often fatal complication following HSCT for which few treatment options are available. BK-directed, JCPyV cross-reactive VSTs are a safe and viable therapeutic option, and prompt administration should be considered once PML is diagnosed. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)