Search

Background: Rare diseases (RDs) are a heterogeneous group of pathologies, which, when present in a donor, with their anatomic or functional deficiencies, may put the recipient at risk. The aim of our work is to analyze the incidence of RDs in our donors to support transplant experts in the evaluation of these organs., Methods: We retrospectively assessed the incidence of RDs in donors from July 2017 to June 2019, along with the risk attributed, the number of transplanted organs, and the follow-up results of the recipients., Results: Over a 24-month period, we had 19 donors with RDs. Of those, the organs of 4 donors were rejected before the risk assessment, the organs of 4 other donors were deemed an unacceptable risk, the organs of 4 more donors were rejected by transplant centers, and the organs of 7 donors were accepted with 16 organs ultimately transplanted (2 hearts, 3 livers, and 11 kidneys). Three of the recipients died of causes not related to the RDs. Thirteen of the recipients are still alive with a functioning organ with an average follow-up of 9 months., Conclusions: Although the evaluation of the results is influenced by the limited follow-up period, the use of donors with RDs has proved safe. One of the critical issues encountered in the evaluation process was the impossibility of carrying out genetic and histologic investigations for each organ in urgency. Moreover, the heterogeneity of RDs and the lack of solid literature data require, for the purpose of assessing the level of risk, a specific assessment of individual cases. To overcome these limitations, a group of experts was set up at the Superior Health Council, who drafted a reference document, which allowed for the assessment of the suitability and risk level of donors with the most frequent RDs., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Despite the well-known benefits of exercise during the pretransplantation and post-transplantation phases, adherence to active lifestyles is still reduced. The aim of the present study is to evaluate how many patients who have received organ transplants and candidates for organ transplantation carry out physical or sports activities in order to increase adherence to an active lifestyle., Methods: The patients who agreed to participate in the study were interviewed about their lifestyle habits by the staff at the nephrology, dialysis, and hepatology units of the Emilia-Romagna region. The interview investigated the patient's lifestyle (active or sedentary) and type of physical activity (walking, cycling, gardening, gym at least 3 to 40 minutes, 2 to 3 times per week) or sport (training > 2 times per week) routinely practiced., Results: We collected 1138 interviews from patients on the waiting list (n = 159) for organ transplant, those with kidney transplants (n = 756), and those with liver transplants (n = 223) monitored in the Emilia-Romagna hospitals (regional patients 67%, extraregional 33%). Eighty-four patients on the waiting list for a transplant (kidney) were sedentary, 75 practiced physical activity, and 10 of 75 physically active patients practiced sport. Four hundred fifteen patients with kidney transplants were sedentary, 341 practiced physical activity, and 31 of 341 physically active patients practiced sport. Among patients with liver transplants, 56 were sedentary, 167 practiced physical activity, and 20 of 167 physically active patients played sport., Conclusions: In-line with the general population, we confirmed a high tendency toward a sedentary lifestyle (44% of respondents) among patients with organ transplants and those on waiting lists for organ transplants. Including a prescription for physical exercise as part of the therapeutic regimen can be useful for changing lifestyles during the pre- and post-transplantation period., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The interest in health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) has increased in the past few years., Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the HR-QoL before and after transplantation in solid organ recipients referred to the North Italy Transplant program., Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed between 2010 and 2011. All consecutive recipients on the waiting list for liver, heart, or kidney transplantation were included and compared to all consecutive transplanted patients at 6 and 24 months of follow-up after transplantation. The HR-QoL was evaluated with the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Questionnaires were self-reported anonymously. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed., Results: Four hundred eleven patients were interviewed: 146 patients (35.5%) were on the waiting list, 137 (33.3%) were transplanted 6 months before the interview, and 128 (31.1%) were transplanted 24 months before the interview. Patients on the waiting list had a lower SF-36 score for all items than did transplanted patients after both 6 and 24 months. According to POMS results, patients on the waiting list had a higher prevalence of depression, tension, anger, fatigue, and confusion than did transplanted patients., Conclusions: Patients on the waiting list showed a worse quality of life compared to patients after transplantation as demonstrated by SF-36 and POMS results. These findings should be confirmed in a cohort study., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)