Search

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether treatment of subclinical, borderline rejections (SR/BR) or histological findings of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in protocol biopsies in the first month posttransplantation after living related kidney transplantation has a beneficial effect on graft histology and renal function at 6 months. Among the 40 paired biopsies, only 6/80 showed no histological lesions. BR was found in 13/40 and 12/40, and SR in 15/40 and 21/40 of patients on the 1- and 6-month biopsies, respectively. The mean histological index/total sum of scores for acute and chronic changes (HI) increased at 6-month biopsy: 5.3 +/- 2.9 vs 7.8 +/- 3.6 (P.001). Similarly, the mean sum of histological markers for chronicity (CAN score) of 2.1 +/- 1.5 increased to 4.6 +/- 2.3 (P.001) on the 6-month biopsy. When divided according to whether there was treatment of BR and SR, the treated BR/SR group on 1-month biopsy had a mean HI score of 7.11 +/- 1.9, which remained almost the same (7.11 +/- 2.32) at 6 months. Among the untreated BR/SR group it increased from 4.95 +/- 1.99 to 8.16 +/- 4.30. However, there was no difference in graft function between the groups from 1 to 6 months. In conclusion, a protocol 1-month biopsy may be valuable to establish the prevalence of BR/SR in stable allografts. The presence of an untreated BR/SR upon a 1-month biopsy showed greater susceptibility for histological deterioration on the 6-month biopsy due to an accelerated CAN process.

The aim of the present study was to identify subclinical and borderline rejections as well as histological markers of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) among protocol biopsies performed at 1 and 6 months after living related kidney transplantation to assess their possible implications for graft function. Twenty paired allograft biopsies performed at 1 and 6 months were reviewed according to the Banff scoring scheme. The mean ages of donors and recipients were 59.6 +/- 13.8 and 34.4 +/- 8.7 years, respectively. Among all biopsies only 10% (4/40) showed no histopathological lesions. At the first month borderline rejection was shown in 35% and subclinical rejection in 10% of patients. At 6 months the proportion of findings was even higher, namely, 40% and 30%, respectively. When divided according to donor age, donors above 55 years showed a mean CAN score of 2.33 +/- 1.56 which increased to 5.0 +/- 2.26 on the 6 month biopsy (214.3%). Unexpectedly, the proportion of these changes in the younger donor group also increased by 173.3%, which might have been explained by the greater number of borderline and subclinical rejections in the younger donor group at the 1 month biopsy. In conclusion, 1 month biopsy may be valuable to determine borderline and subclinical rejection and to prognosticate the outcome of renal allograft function. Our findings suggest a greater susceptibility of histological deterioration among the older donor population. However, the presence of an untreated rejection in the younger donor pool leads to a rapid impairment of the graft function accelerating the process of chronic allograft nephropathy.

Due to the increase of organ shortage and still inadequate development of cadaver transplantation, many end-stage patients from the Balkan region travel mostly to India to buy a kidney. Despite all the ethical dilemmas and discussions, organ sales is present nowdays in Third-World countries. Sixteen patients (13 from Macedonia and 3 from Kosovo, SCG) were observed clinically during a period of 10 years. Recipients of mean age 36.5 years (range 10 to 58) displayed the following underlying diseases: chronic glomerulonephritis (n = 5), urethral valves with reflux (n = 2), ADPKD (n = 1), hypertensive nephropathy (n = 4), lithiasis (n = 1), and unknown cause of ESRD (n = 3). The donor population was young (22 to 29 years). Most patient records did not include data on HLA, cross-match, MLC, kind of surgery, or usual pretransplant workup. The immunosuppressive protocol included CyA, PRED, and AZA or MMF. All transplanted patients were followed on an outpatient basis in our department; patients with complications were hospitalized. The 1, 3, 5, and 10 year Kaplan Meier graft survival rates were 78.6%, 50.2%, 33.3%, and 18.8%, respectively. Seven patients were lost (43.7%), two during the first month after transplantation, two at the end of the first year, and three at 5, 6, and 8 years thereafter. The main reasons for death were severe pulmonary infections with sepsis, hepatitis B with liver cirrhosis, Kala Azar, CMV, and cancer of the colon. Five grafts were lost due to repeated rejection episodes and chronic graft nephropathy. The last three cases remained with good renal function and actual serum creatinine values of 135 +/- 9. In view of this experience, the authors cannot recommend this type of transplantation, not only from the ethical point of view, but also from frequent medical and surgical complications which are sometimes life threatening.