Search

Background Dual kidney transplantation (DKT) is a largely accepted strategy to enlarge the donor pool. Niguarda Hospital started this program in December 2010, and 38 DKT have been performed. In our series, we included recipients older than those in the other series published in literature. The aim of this study was to know if our recipient selection criteria for DKT are safe. Methods We reviewed our data base of DKT and analyzed recipients' medical history, surgical technique, post-operative complications, graft survival, morbidity, and mortality. We then compared our results with the literature. Results From December 2010 to April 2015, 38 DKT were performed in Niguarda Hospital. Delayed graft function was present in 21 recipients. Explantation of both kidneys was performed in 1 patient and explantation of 1 kidney in 6 patients. Post-operative complications were present in 8 patients. Five patients returned to hemodialysis after DKT. One recipient died of medical post-operative sepsis. The mean follow-up was 24 months. Graft survival and patient survival were 86.84% and 97.93%, respectively. Compared with the literature, our series had similar mortality and morbidity rates, even if recipients' age was higher than in other series. Conclusions The strategy of DKT allocation in elderly recipients is safe. Further studies have to be performed to optimized selection of the recipients for DKT not to disadvantage younger patients in the transplant waiting list and to improve the technique of organ evaluation and preservation to refine graft allocation.

Background Elderly donor livers are thought to be marginal graft. In the present study, we aimed to identify an age threshold to consider a graft as elderly to identify the trend (if any) of the donor age in our series and to identify an efficient allocation criteria for elderly grafts. Methods We reviewed in a retrospective manner our series of 1520 liver transplants, comparing graft survival under and over a certain age. On the basis of the results of this analysis, we identified a threshold of 70 years to define a graft as old. The donor age trend analysis showed an increasing rate of transplants from elderly donors. Results To identify efficient allocation criteria for elderly graft, we stratified the series by the disease of the recipient: 556 patients underwent transplants for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC+ group) and 964 for other diseases (HCC− group). Two hundred twenty-one patients of 556 of the HCC+ group were hepatitis c virus (HCV) negative (HCC+/HCV− group), and 312 of 964 of the HCC− group were HCV positive (HCC−/HCV+). The survival analysis showed no significant differences in comparing the outcome for elderly and young grafts in the HCC+ ( P = .135) and HCC− ( P = .055) groups. Conclusions When comparing the survival of old and young livers in the HCC+/HCV− group, the elderly livers appear to have a better outcome ( P = .05); on the other hand, the same analysis in the HCC−/HCV+ group shows a worse outcome for old-aged grafts ( P = .026). Therefore, the present study suggests that elderly livers should be allocated to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and should be avoided in HCV+ recipients.

Aim We aimed to analyze the risk factors for early surgical complications requiring relaparotomy and the related impact on overall survival (OS) in HIV-infected patients submitted to liver transplantation. Methods We performed a retrospective study on a nationwide multicenter cohort of 157 HIV-infected patients submitted to liver transplantation in 6 Italian transplant units between 2004 to 2014. Results The median preoperative model for end-stage liver disease score was 18 (interquartile range 12-26.5). An early relaparotomy was performed in 24.8% of patients, and the underlying clinical causes were biliary leak (8.2%), bleeding (8.2%), intestinal perforation (4.5%), and suspected vascular complications (3.8%). The OS at 1, 3, and 5 years was 74.3%, 68.0%, and 60.0%, respectively, and an early relaparotomy was not a prognostic factor itself, but an increasing number of relaparotomies was associated with decreased survival (hazard ratio = 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.81, P = .01). In the multivariate analysis, preoperative refractory ascites (odds ratio 3.32, 95% CI 1.18-6.47, P = .02) and Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy reconstruction (odds ratio 12.712, 95% CI 2.47-65.38, P ≤ .01) were identified as significant risk factors for early relaparotomy. Conclusions In HIV-infected liver transplant recipients, an increasing number of early relaparotomies due to surgical complications did negatively affect the OS. Preoperative refractory ascites reflecting a severe portal hypertension and a difficult biliary tract reconstruction requiring a Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy were associated with an increased risk of early relaparotomy.

Introduction Robot-assisted kidney harvesting from living donors is feasible and safe. We report the results of a mono-centric experience relative to 98 consecutive robotic nephrectomies with emphasis on global donor complications. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective cohort study. Donors underwent robot-assisted kidney harvesting. The preferred kidney was the left one even in the presence of vascular anomalies. In the first cases we used a robotic hand–assisted technique, then the totally robotic technique, and finally the modified totally robot-assisted technique. Postoperative complications were ranked according to the five-grade Clavien-Dindo classification. Results Between November 2009 and November 2016, 98 living donors underwent nephrectomy. We experienced 14 complications. The 3 intraoperative ones (3.06%) were 1 pneumothorax and 2 acute bleedings, 1 of them requiring transfusion. The 11 postoperative complications (11.22%) were as follows: 5 wound seromas, 1 rhabdomyolisis (Clavien I), 1 paretic ileum, 1 anemia requiring transfusion, 1 hypertensive crisis (Clavien II), and 2 chylus collections drained by interventional radiologists (Clavien III). Transfusion rate was 2.1%; conversions, reoperations, and mortality were nil. No statistically significant difference was observed between the patients with complications and without in terms of gender, age, anatomical anomalies, body mass index (BMI), and learning curve. We observed a longer global operation length of time in patients with complications. Conclusion Robotic assistance results in shorter and simpler learning curves for the harvesting of kidneys from living donors. It enables an easier and more efficient management of possible intraoperative complications. The rate of postoperative complications is comparable with the rate of complications encountered in traditional laparoscopic series with high numbers of harvestings.

Background Robot-assisted surgery provide endowrist instruments and 3-dimensional visualization of the operative field that are improvements over traditional laparoscopy. The few research studies published so far have demonstrated that living-donor nephrectomy using the robot-assisted technique is safe and feasible, providing advantages for patients. Methods Since November 2009, we performed 20 robot-assisted living-donor nephrectomies. Eight patients underwent hand-assisted robotic nephrectomy, whereas 20, totally robotic nephrectomy. Results Median intraoperative bleeding was 174 mL (range, 10-750) but no patient needed intraoperative transfusion with blood cells. The median warm ischemia time was 3.16 minutes (range, 0.30-6.5). There was no case of conversion to an open procedure. The median operative time was 311 minutes (range, 85-530); the median console time was 160 minutes (range, 135-220). Conclusion Robot-assisted living-donor kidney recovery was a safe and effective procedure. The totally robotic recovery is an evolving technique. The prospect of robotic staplers, endowrist ligature, and robotic single port may further increase these advantages. © 2013 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Introduction The aim of this article was to compare the results of right hemiliver transplants from living versus cadaver donors in a single institution. Methods Between March 1999 and May 2003, we performed 10 right hemiliver transplants from living donors (LD) and 8 right hemiliver transplants from cadavers (CD). The procedure consisted of grafting liver segments 5, 6, 7, and 8. The procedure was performed with a fully perfused liver also in the CD group (in situ split). Results With follow-up between 7 days and 26 months in the LD group, 2 patients died with functioning grafts: 1 patient died because of massive pulmonary bleeding due to Rendu-Osler Syndrome; the other one died as a consequence of systemic aspergillosis. One patient underwent retransplantation due to arterial thrombosis. In the CD group with a follow-up between 31 days and 48 months, 3 patients died due to sepsis, including 2 who were status 2A. There were 4 early complications among the LD group and 5 in the CD group. The patient and graft survival rates were 80% and 70%, respectively, in the LD group; and both about 62% in the CD group. Conclusion Right hemiliver grafts are at high risk due to technical and septic complications. A higher morbidity is observed in the CD group, where the vascular and biliary tree anatomy cannot be investigated with accuracy. We must avoid transplanting status 2A recipients with this kind of graft.

Introduction: Chronic viral hepatitis is considered to be the most significant risk factor for development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, about 5%-15% of HCC occur in noncirrhotic or virus-unrelated cirrhotic patients. The natural history of HCC in terms of incidence, clinical features, and tumor progression differs according to the underlying cancerogenic factors and differences in hepatocarcinogenetic pathways. Little is know about the relationship between HCC outcomes after liver transplantation (OLT) and the primary liver disease. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients transplanted due to HCC in settings of either virus-related or virus-unrelated cirrhosis. Patients and Methods: From January 2000 to December 2007, 179 patients underwent OLT due to HCC: 157 (87.8%) affected by virus-related (group A) and 22 (12.2%) virus-unrelated cirrhosis (group B). We analyzed patient characteristics including demographics, tumor features, downstaging treatments, and recurrences. Results: At a mean follow-up of 41.2 months, the 3- and 5-year overall long-term survivals between group A versus group B were 81% versus 75% and 85% versus 78.4% respectively (P = NS). The 3- and 5-year disease-free survivals between group A versus group B were 90.8% versus 89.6% and 85.6% versus 85.6%, respectively (P = NS). After OLT, HCC recurrences occurred in 14 group A (14/157, 8.9%) and 4 patients (4/22, 18.1%) group B subjects. Discussion: Our data demonstrated that after OLT, HCC outcomes were not different between patients with virus-related or -unrelated cirrhosis. The direct oncogenetic role played by hepatitis B and C appear to not be associated with a greater risk to develop HCC recurrence. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Objective: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may represent a valid therapeutic option allowing several advantages for patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, some reports in the literature have demonstrated worse long-term and disease-free survivals among patients treated by LDLT than deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for HCC. Herein we have reported our long-term results comparing LDLT with DDLT for HCC. Patients and Methods: Among 179 patients who underwent OLT from January 2000 to December 2007, 25 (13.9%) received LDLT with HCC 154 (86.1%) received DDLT. Patients were selected based on the Milan criteria. Transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous alcoholization, or liver resection was applied as a downstaging procedure while on the waiting list. Patients with stage II HCC were proposed for LDLT. Results: The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 77.3% and 68.7% versus 82.8% and 76.7% for LDLT and DDLT recipients, respectively, with no significant difference by the log-rank test. Moreover, the 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 95.5% and 95.5% (LDLT) versus 90.5% and 89.4% (DDLT; P = NS). Conclusions: LDLT guarantees the same long-term results as DDLT where there are analogous selection criteria for candidates. The Milan criteria remain a valid tool to select candidates for LDLT to achieve optimal long-term results. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Liver adenomatosis (LA) is a rare benign disease of the liver with unclear pathogenesis, which is characterized by multiple hepatic adenomas. The management of LA remains controversial. Herein we have reported a case of LA treated by living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A 48-year-old woman developed multiple liver adenomas. In view of the sizes and localizations of the lesions, the patient underwent right hepatic resection and segment II nodulectomy. Thirty-four months later, she developed recurrence of multiple hepatic adenomas and 2 nodules were highly suspect for hepatocellular carcinoma. Re-resection was not indicated due to the whole liver being involved with adenomas. The patient underwent LDLT. At 45 months thereafter she is alive and disease-free. In conclusion, LDLT is indicated in cases of nonresectability; it may offer optimal results in view of the absence of portal hypertension and the elimination of waiting list time. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

In right lobe living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT), reconstruction of middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries is often necessary to avoid severe graft congestion. From March 2001, we performed 36 right lobe ALDLT (segments 5, 6, 7, and 8) without MHV and one pediatric transplant (segments 2 and 3). In the presence of MHV tributaries larger than 5 mm, we intraoperatively evaluated the need for reconstruction. At a mean follow-up of 848 days (range = 8-2412), 33/37 transplanted patients are alive with overall patient and graft survivals of 89.2% and 83.8%, respectively. Large MHV tributaries (>5 mm) were present in 10 cases, and inferior right hepatic veins (IRHV) draining segment 6 in 11 cases. In 10 cases, we performed an end-to-side anastomosis between the IRHV and the side of the recipient vena cava. In three cases, the MHV tributaries were end-to-end anastomosed to the stump of the recipient MHV. In all other cases, the vein tributaries were not reconstructed. A computed tomography scan performed from 1 to 3 months after surgery did not show any congested area in the liver parenchyma. In our experience, reconstruction of the MHV tributaries was not always necessary when graft-to-recipient weight ratio is >0.8. Pre- and intraoperative evaluation of the segmental branches of the hepatic vein is crucial to decide about reconstructing these collaterals. Anastomosis of V5 or V8 to the stump of the recipient MHV reduces the number of vascular anastomosis and maintains a physiological angle between these collaterals and the caval vein. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Although right hemiliver transplant from living donors (LD) is gaining acceptance as a way to overcome the critical organ shortage, splitting a liver for two adults from cadaveric donor (CD) is still controversial. Methods. From May 1999 to August 2004 we performed nine right hemiliver transplants using segments 5-6-7-8 from CD and 18 from LD. Results. We compared the two procedures to evaluate both the technical aspects and the patients' outcomes. In the CD group, three recipients died (33%), two of whom were UNOS Status 2A. Patient and graft survivals were 67% (median follow-up: 23 months). Among the LD group, three recipients died (17%) and two were retransplanted; one because of arterial thrombosis and the other as a consequence of small-for-size syndrome. Patient and graft survivals were 83% and 72%, respectively (median follow-up: 8 months). There were five early complications in the CD group (55%) and five (27%) in the LD group. Two patients in the LD group experienced a late stenosis of the biliary anastomosis. Discussion. Data from our early experience show that better results are achieved by right hemiliver transplants from LD; the morbidity and mortality are higher among the CD group. We believe that this finding is probably a consequence of better preoperative donor evaluation, shorter ischemia time, better logistics, and learning curve. Recipient selection is crucial; this kind of graft is at high risk of poor function, technical complications, and infections. Further experience will help to clarify the reliability of right hemiliver transplants from CD. © 2005 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved