Search

Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has been proposed as a marker of systemic inflammation in major trauma patients that is associated with in-hospital mortality. However, the initial neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio does not appear to be predictive of in-hospital mortality. The aim of this study is to determine the discriminative ability of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio profile over 48 h as a predictor of in-hospital mortality following major trauma. Methods: This was a case-control study involving all major trauma patients meeting the criteria for inclusion into the Alfred Health Trauma Registry who presented directly from the scene of injury over a 24-month period. Patients were then divided into two groups, cases being major trauma patients who died at hospital discharge and controls being patients who survived. We extracted data for Day 0, Day 1 and Day 2 neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio values for each patient. The primary outcome was mortality at hospital discharge. Results: Data were extracted for 1689 major trauma patients, of which 72% were male, the median age was 49 years (IQR 31–68) and most (90%) patients presented after a blunt mechanism of injury. There were 165 cases that were compared to 1524 controls. Patients who died were older (p < 0.001), and had higher injury severity scores (p < 0.001) and lower revised trauma scores (p < 0.001). Analysis of response profiles demonstrated a significant difference between the trajectories of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio over time (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The profile of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio over 48 h after injury shows promise as a prognostic tool in trauma and warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proposed as a marker of systemic inflammation in major trauma patients that is associated with in-hospital mortality. We aimed to determine the discriminative ability of initial NLR as a predictor of outcomes following major trauma. Methods: This was a registry-based cohort study involving all major trauma patients meeting criteria for inclusion into the Alfred Health Trauma Registry who presented directly from the scene of injury over a 24-month period (January 2018 to December 2019). The initial NLR was calculated for each patient and was compared against the Shock Index (SI), lactate and Revised Trauma Score (RTS). Outcomes observed were mortality at hospital discharge and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We assessed the predictive capacity of each test using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and performed area under the ROC curve (AUROC) analysis to compare their performance. Results: Data were extracted for 1687 major trauma patients, of which 72% were male, the median age was 49 years (IQR 31–68) and most (90%) of patients presented after a blunt mechanism of injury. In-hospital mortality occurred in 165 (9.77%) patients, and 725 (42.92%) patients required ICU admission. The median NLR was 6.84 (IQR 3.89–11.52). Initial NLR performed poorly with an AUROC of 0.46 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40–0.52) for prediction of mortality and AUROC of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.50–0.56) for prediction of ICU admission. The AUROCs of initial NLR for both mortality at hospital discharge and ICU admission were significantly lower than SI, lactate and RTS. Conclusion: Initial NLR was not predictive of outcomes in major trauma. NLR at other time-points may provide better predictive capacity for outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Dex® is an alkaline carbohydrate (CHO) drink used preoperatively in patients fasting for elective surgery. Its utilisation in patients awaiting emergency surgery is yet to be ascertained. We undertook a study assessing patient satisfaction relating to the introduction of Dex® in trauma patients in a Level 1 adult trauma centre. Methods: Patients fasting for surgery, and able to receive clear fluids in compliance with local guidelines, were eligible for inclusion. Patient satisfaction scores for predetermined variables were recorded via an interval observer scale prior to and following the introduction of Dex® to the trauma unit. Results: Prior to the introduction of Dex® 14 satisfaction evaluations were completed. A further 13 evaluations were returned after Dex® was made available. Post-traumatic amnesia accounted for some patients being unable to complete the evaluation. Patients who completed the satisfaction evaluations after Dex® was introduced reported higher satisfaction in all but two variables ('Headache' and 'Staff Annoyance'). 'Hunger' median scores were 7 (95% CI, 5–8) prior to the introduction of Dex® and 3 (95% CI, 2–6) after its' introduction (p =.004). 'Thirst' median scores were 7.5 (95% CI, 6–10) and 4 (95% CI, 3–8) prior to and after Dex® introduction, respectively (p =.018). Conclusion: No adverse events or theatre timing related issues were associated with the use of Dex®. A larger randomised study of CHO drink supplementation in trauma patients fasting preoperatively is warranted to further evaluate these satisfaction endpoints as well as the other variables investigated in this study. Postoperative evaluation of these markers should also be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Procedural complication rates associated with tube thoracostomy for pleural decompression is estimated to be between 2 and 25%, with incorrect insertion site being a common problem. We hypothesised that the inferior-most hair follicle in the axillary region would provide an accurate biometric marker to identify the fourth to sixth intercostal space. Methods: A prospective cohort of patients requiring computed tomography scan of the chest was recruited from February 2015 to March 2016 at The Alfred Hospital. The inferior-most hair follicle on the patient's axillary region was tagged with a paperclip, and a radiologist reported this location with reference to the corresponding intercostal spaces. Results: Of the 254 enrolled patients, a total of 310 paperclip positions over intercostal spaces were analysed. There were 101 (32.5%) paperclips positioned in the fourth and fifth intercostal spaces with the remainder at the second or third intercostal spaces, and no paperclips placed at the sixth intercostal space or lower. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the inferior-most hair follicle in the axilla corresponded to an area between the second and fifth intercostal spaces. Recognition of this surface anatomy has the potential to eliminate iatrogenic injuries to the diaphragm and sub-diaphragmatic organs, but should not be used as the sole marker due to potential risks from high placement of pleural drains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]