Search

Background: Blunt traumatic vertebral artery injury is commonly associated with head and cervical spinal trauma. However, those associated with chest or upper extremity injuries without cervical spine-related trauma are rare. Case presentation: A 94-year-old woman was injured in a motor vehicle crash. She was diagnosed with traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, bilateral subdural hematomas, right vertebral artery injury, and right clavicle fracture. No cervical spine injuries were observed. It was possible that the fracture fragment of the right clavicle may have directly injured the right vertebral artery. Coil embolization was performed for the vertebral artery injury. The patient had a good postoperative course and was transferred to the hospital for rehabilitation on day 65. Conclusion: Regarding the high-risk injury mechanism, blunt traumatic vertebral artery injuries in the V1–2 segment may occur in cases with clavicle fractures.

A 77-year-old woman with no medical history fell, and her face was strongly impacted on the ground. On arrival at our hospital, her initial vital signs were stable. She underwent an endoscopy to stop the bleeding. However, identification of the origin of the bleeding failed, and her injury resulted in hemorrhagic shock during the procedure. Head to face contrast computed tomography showed extravasation of contrast media into the maxillary sinus. Transcatheter arterial embolization was performed for the ruptured infraorbital artery branching from the maxillary artery. She recovered from the “shock” state after transcatheter arterial embolization and was admitted to the intensive care unit. There were no complications associated with transcatheter arterial embolization during hospitalization. For this case, early recognition of an active hemorrhage was challenging because the hemorrhage was pooled in the sinuses. Although epistaxis is sometimes fatal, transcatheter arterial embolization can be the first choice for the treatment of life-threatening epistaxis, owing to its safety and effectiveness.

A 39-year-old male fell from a forklift and was urgently transported to our hospital. His vital signs were stable at the initial visit. Contrast imaging computed tomography (CT) showed extravasation (Ev) of contrast medium emigrating outside of the renal capsule and hematoma around the right kidney, and he was diagnosed with traumatic right renal injury, Grade IV laceration [American Association for the Surgery of Trauma classification]. When imaging the inferior renal artery branch extremity perfusing the area where Ev was found in the following blood vessel contrast imaging, obvious Ev was not found in the arterial phase; however, massively spreading Ev was found in the area adjacent to the renal laceration in the venous phase after taking a contrast image of the renal parenchyma. Thus, he was diagnosed with a renal vein branch injury. The transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) was performed to the area, resulting in the disappearance of Ev.The effectiveness of TAE for renal injury has been established; however, it is only performed for arterial hemorrhage. TAE for venous injury has not previously been considered because a tamponade is supposedly effective for hemostasis of venous hemorrhage due to the anatomy surrounding Gerota's fasciae. This is an extremely rare case in which only venous injury was identified, without obvious arterial hemorrhage. Gerota's fasciae were broken and hemostasis treatment was required. Because the renal artery is the end artery, the venous hemorrhage was controlled with arterial embolization.In our case, renal vein branch injury was identified on CT and hemorrhage was terminated using TAE for the renal artery branch. TAE can be used as a non-operative management for the successful treatment of renal vein branch injury. Keywords: Non-operative management, Renal vein branch injury, Transcatheter arterial embolization, Venous hemorrhage