Search

Since 1986, German ultrasound criteria for grading carotid stenosis have followed the local diameter reduction percentage consistent with the definition used in the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) definition. To overcome the confusion caused by the coexisting grading method used in the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), a German interdisciplinary council on carotid artery stenosis has recommended the implementation of the NASCET grading system (distal diameter reduction percentage) as the standard. The multi-parametric German "DEGUM ultrasound criteria" consisting of combined Doppler and imaging criteria have consequently been revised and transferred to the NASCET definition. In addition, a novel differentiation between main (primary) and additional (secondary) criteria has been proposed. When these ultrasound criteria are combined, vascular sonography allows reliable grading of carotid disease.

Therapeutic decisions in cases of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the internal carotid artery usually depend mainly on the degree of stenosis. However, the recommendations with regard to suitable ultrasonographic criteria are so controversial that even authors of repute describe "confusion" and "chaos in methodology".The aim of this study is to assess which of the most frequently recommended sonographic criteria for stenosis best fulfill the requirements of an exact quantification of stenoses of the internal carotid artery.In 42 consecutive cases the preoperative ultrasound findings were compared with the degree of stenosis in surgically removed specimens. The sonographic technique employed consisted of the analysis of 2 direct and 3 indirect hemodynamic criteria of stenosis. In 34 of these cases planimetry was performed, too. The specimens were obtained by eversion thrombendarteriectomy or arteriotomy; for determination of the degree of stenosis a Paladur molded cylinder was prepared and measured.Quantification of the haemodynamic criteria carries provided well with the endarterectomy specimens. Only in two cases there was a deviation of more than 10 %; however, in these two cases a change with time in the degree of stenosis was probably responsible for the discrepancy. In contrast, planimetry usually underestimated the degree of stenosis: In 61 % of the findings the ultrasonographic results differed by more than 10 % from the reference standard.Quantification of stenosis of the internal carotid artery should be made using a combination of direct and indirect haemodynamic ultrasonographic criteria.

The practical application of colour-coded duplex sonography shows that physico-technical artifacts of colour Doppler imaging may not be obvious in all cases and can lead to misinterpretation. Slice-thickness artifacts are due to restricted transversal resolution, as in the B-mode, and may cause false negative results in vascular occlusions. Specific problems in creating and processing the colour flow image interfere with lateral resolution and lead to errors in the quantification of stenoses from the colour Doppler image. Mirror image artifacts produce phantom pictures that can be easily identified as such in some cases, but may resemble recesses in the arterial wall in other cases. Phenomena of sound shadowing resulting from the same reasons as in B-mode may lead to assume vascular occlusions in cases of long-range stenoses. Artifacts of the sonication angle in case of blood vessel tortuosity may lead to misdiagnosis of a non-existent retrograde flow. The artifacts mentioned do restrict the capacity of colour coded duplex sonography for localising flow in the ultrasound image. Users of the method should therefore be familiar with these artifacts.