1. Ultrasound Criteria for Diagnosing Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissections.
- Author
-
Arning C
- Subjects
- Young Adult, Humans, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors therapeutic use, Arteries, Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection diagnostic imaging, Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection drug therapy, Vertebral Artery Dissection diagnostic imaging, Vertebral Artery Dissection etiology, Stroke, Aortic Dissection diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Spontaneous dissection of brain-supplying cervical arteries, which also includes findings after minor injuries, is one of the main causes of ischaemic strokes in young adults. Strokes due to dissection are usually due to arterio-arterial embolism. They are rarely the first symptom of dissection because an intraluminal thrombus must first develop. Therefore, early diagnosis of dissection can contribute to stroke prevention - through immediate therapy with anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs. This article describes the diagnostic criteria and typical findings of spontaneous dissection, in which no dissecting membrane is to be expected as in aortic dissection. Traumatic dissections following blunt or penetrating injuries also present with different findings. Examiners should be aware of possible differential diagnoses whose ultrasound image may mimic a dissection. A frequently occurring but avoidable cause of misdiagnosis is idiopathic carotidynia. Ultrasound also enables differentiation between dissection and vasculitis or carotid web and detection of normal variants such as fenestration of the vertebral artery. Further possibilities for misdiagnosis may arise in the presence of a variant of the ascending pharyngeal artery or in extracranial vasospasm. The different imaging techniques for the detection of a dissection are complementary, as false-negative findings occur with all techniques; no method serves as the gold standard. In any case, ultrasound can make an important contribution to the detection of a dissection, and it is worth knowing the diagnostic criteria., Competing Interests: Declaration of financial interestsReceipt of research funding: no; receipt of payment/financial advantage for providing services as a lecturer: no; paid consultant/internal trainer/salaried employee: no; patent/business interest/shares (author/partner, spouse, children) in company: no; patent/business interest/shares (author/partner, spouse, children) in sponsor of this CME article or in company whose interests are affected by the CME article: no.Declaration of non-financial interestsThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF