Search

This paper shuffles together several reflections which were wrung out of a specific ethnographic approach, staged on a street at the Manizales' historical center (Colombia). Through it, the ethnographer's experience on the field is shown as a journey of "walking" on the street, so that it provides the grounds to impinge upon current problematic notions in anthropology, such as reflexivity, the social significance of massive flow spaces and methodological questions, and the practices such ethnographic situations demand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lies, accounts and performance aimed at deceiving the audience, always haunt the researcher's mind. Whether one chooses quantitative or qualitative (even ethnographic) means, researchers come up with methodological devices (triangulation, re-interviewing, being there, rapport) as ways to eliminate distortion from researchers and respondents, and to get true statements and categories from our social subjects. In this paper I take advantage of an "identity lie" (or a fake identity) which came up while I was working with Malvinas war veterans in Buenos Aires (1992). By comparing veterans' identities to my own identity as an anthropologist in the field, I show that lies are part of metacommunicative competences by which both vets and I learn to talk and act about "Malvinas". By means of this reflexive twist, deceptive informants appear to challenge our methodological assumptions, not just because they alter the reliability of our accounts, but rather because they illuminate the very core of our identities at work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]