Search

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to biopsy has improved detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (CaP), but its impact on surgical outcomes is less well established. We compared MRI vs. non-MRI diagnostic pathways among patients receiving radical prostatectomy (RP) for impact on surgical outcomes.Men diagnosed with CaP and receiving RP at Loyola University Medical Center (2014-2021) were categorized into MRI or non-MRI diagnostic pathways based on receipt of MRI before prostate biopsy. Primary outcomes of interest included positive surgical margin (PSM) rates, the performance of bilateral nerve-sparing, and biochemical recurrence (BCR). Multivariable logistic regression models, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression were employed.Of 609 patients, 281 (46.1%) were in the MRI and 328 (53.9%) in the non-MRI groups. MRI patients had similar PSA, biopsy grade group (GG) distribution, RP GG, pT stage, and RP CaP volume compared to non-MRI patients. PSM rates were not statistically different for the MRI vs. non-MRI groups (22.8% vs. 26.8%, P = 0.25). Bilateral nerve-sparing rates were higher for the MRI vs. non-MRI groups (OR 1.95 (95%CI 1.32-2.88), P = 0.001). The MRI group demonstrated improved BCR (HR 0.64 (95%CI 0.41-0.99), P = 0.04) after adjustment for age, PSA, RP GG, pT, pN, and PSM status. On meta-analysis, a 5.2% PSM reduction was observed but high heterogeneity for use of nerve-sparing.An MRI-based diagnostic approach selected patients for RP with a small reduction in PSM rates, greater utilization of bilateral nerve-sparing, and improved cancer control by BCR compared to a non-MRI approach even after adjustment for known prognostic factors.

Ductal adenocarcinoma (DA) and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) of the prostate are associated with higher stage disease at radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated diagnostic accuracy of biopsy, MRI-visibility, and outcomes for patients undergoing RP with DA/IDC histology compared to pure acinar adenocarcinoma (AA) of the prostate.A retrospective cohort study of men receiving RP between 2014 and 2021 revealing AA, DA, or IDC on final pathology was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed.A total of 609 patients were included with 103 found to have DA/IDC. Patients with DA/IDC were older and had higher PSA, biopsy grade group (GG), RP GG, and other pathologic findings (extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, pN stage) compared to AA patients (all P0.05). On multivariable analysis, higher age, RP GG, and pT3a were associated with DA/IDC on RP (all P0.05). Sensitivity and specificity of biopsy compared to RP for diagnosis of DA/IDC was 29.1% (16.7% DA, 27.8% IDC) and 96.6% (99.3% DA, 96.6% IDC), respectively. In a subset of 281 men receiving MRI, PI-RADS distribution was similar for patients with DA/IDC vs. AA (90.7% vs. 80.7% with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions, P = 0.23) with slightly higher biopsy sensitivity (41.9%). DA/IDC was associated with worse BCR (HR = 1.77, P = 0.02) but not biopsy DA/IDC (P = 0.90).Sensitivity of prostate biopsy was low for detection of DA/IDC histology at RP. Patients with DA/IDC histology had unfavorable pathologic features at RP and worse BCR. Of patients with DA/IDC at RP, 90.7% were categorized as PI-RADS 4 to 5 on preoperative MRI.

Standard margin partial nephrectomy (SPN) with sharp incision across normal renal parenchyma carries perioperative morbidity and renal functional implications. Tumor enucleation (TE) is an alternative approach using a natural plane of dissection around the tumor pseudocapsule to maximize parenchymal preservation. We compared perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes for robotic-assisted TE to SPN.Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing robotic-assisted TE or SPN were included (2008-2020). Baseline demographics and tumor characteristics were compared. Perioperative, renal functional, and oncologic outcomes were assessed for comparative effectiveness.A total of 467 patients were included with 176 (37.7%) TE and 291 (62.3%) SPN. Baseline characteristics and final histology were comparable; 18% of patients had baseline stage 3 chronic kidney disease. TE had lower median blood loss, operative time, length of stay, and fewer complications compared to SPN. Positive margin rates were higher for TE vs. SPN (8.5% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.04) with similar recurrence rates (2.3% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.48) and no difference in cancer-specific or overall survival with median 4.0 years follow-up. Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was comparable (76.1 vs. 78.2, P = 0.63) while renal function in the first year was better preserved with TE (74.6 vs. 68.1, P0.001) showing an 8-point estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.001) advantage after adjustment. The rate of stage ≥3 chronic kidney disease by 12 months was lower for TE compared to SPN (21.5% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.006).TE is an alternative approach to SPN associated with favorable perioperative and renal functional outcomes. While positive margin rates are higher, longer-term recurrence rates are no different suggesting pseudocapsule disruption during TE has limited impact on oncologic outcomes.