Search

Objectives: To test the clinical value and role of uCyt+ as a noninvasive tool for the detection and surveillance of urothelial carcinoma., Methods: Included in this prospective study were 235 patients (mean age 71.5 years, range 32 to 86). Of these, 98 patients had signs and symptoms suggestive of bladder cancer and 137 patients were being followed up after complete transurethral resection of superficial urothelial cancer (UC). All patients underwent urinary cytology and the uCyt+ test performed on ThinPrep (thin layer). All underwent subsequent cystoscopy and evaluation of any suspicious lesion by biopsy., Results: A total of 102 patients had histologically proven UC. In the group of patients with signs and symptoms suspicious of UC, the sensitivity of cytology increased from 5% for G1 to 84.6% for G3 tumors; for uCyt+, it was 85% for G1, 100% for G2, and 92.3% for G3 tumors. Combining cytology and uCyt+, the sensitivity was 85% for G1 and 100% for G2 and G3. In the group of follow-up patients, the sensitivity of cytology increased from 4.3% for G1 to 94.4% for G3 tumors; for uCyt+, it was 78.2% for G1, 70% for G2, and 94.4% for G3 tumors. Combining both tests, the sensitivity was 78.2% for G1, 90% for G2, and 100% for G3., Conclusions: The uCyt+ is a valid test in the detection of UC of all grades and stages. It improves the sensitivity of cytology in low-grade tumors. The two tests combined may be a highly sensitive method to detect UC early in detection and surveillance.

Objectives: To assess the clinical performance of ImmunoCyt in the detection of upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma (UT-TCC). This newly developed immunocytochemical test detects three cellular markers specific for TCC., Methods: Thirty-seven patients with symptoms and/or findings on imaging suggestive of UT tumors were prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent a standard cytologic evaluation and ImmunoCyt testing of voided urine, as well as imaging studies. Urine samples were also obtained from the UT of 32 patients by ureteral catheterization and tested by cytologic analysis and ImmunoCyt., Results: Sixteen patients had UT-TCC as documented by the final histologic evaluation. The sensitivity of testing the voided urine from 37 patients was 50% for cytologic analysis, 75% for ImmunoCyt, and 87% for both methods combined. The cytologic evaluation detected no G1, 1 (17%) of 6 G2, and 7 (100%) of 7 G3 tumors. ImmunoCyt detected 1 (33%) of 3 G1, 6 (100%) of 6 G2, and 5 (71%) of 7 G3 tumors. The sensitivity in the 32 urine samples obtained from the UT was 82% for cytologic analysis, 91% for ImmunoCyt, and 100% for both methods combined. Cytologic analysis detected all G2 and G3 (100% sensitivity) and no G1 tumors. ImmunoCyt detected 2 (100% sensitivity) of 2 G1, 4 (100%) of 4 G2, and 4 (80%) of 5 G3 tumors. The test specificity, calculated in 21 patients free of TCC, was 100% for cytologic analysis in voided and ureteral urine specimens and 95% and 100% for ImmunoCyt in voided and ureteral urine samples, respectively., Conclusions: The results of this preliminary study show that ImmunoCyt complements cytologic analysis in detecting UT-TCC, mainly because of its high sensitivity to low-grade TCC. The combination of cytologic testing and ImmunoCyt gives 100% sensitivity in detecting UT-TCC in UT urine samples.