Search

Purpose: To compare the effects of RALP and LRP on health-related QoL following radical prostatectomy, focusing on studies performed via validated QoL questionnaires measuring particularly general health-related QoL. Material and Methods: A systematic search was conducted using Web of Science, PubMed (MEDLINE) on 15 January 2023 with the following search terms solely or in combination: "robotic radical prostatectomy", "laparoscopic radical prostatectomy," and "quality of life". After retrieving the titles and abstracts of selected articles, the full texts of related articles were screened. Results: After full-text evaluation, among 185 articles, 23 articles were found eligible for inclusion. Hoze et al. reported that the global health status at the 12th month of the surgery was almost the same in both groups according to EORTC- QLQ-C30 scores (76.3 in the RALRP group vs. 76.1 in the LRP group). Wang et al. reported a 75 point of EORTC-QOL-C30 global health status ten years after LRP. Wyler et al. found that the 1-3 month EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health score was significantly worser than the baseline score, 65.3±18.3 vs. 77.2±18.2; however, it returned to baseline in 13-24 months (77.7±16.8) even proceed baseline score in experienced hands at 49-58 months follow up, 78.2±17.8 vs. 85.3±15.5. The frequently used patient-reported quality of life questionnaire following RALRP was EORTC-QLQ. Conclusion: Both robotic-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy are valid treatment options to achieve a good quality of life following surgery. The intermediate and long-term results in regard to QoL are comparable between the two procedures. RALRP might be superior to LRP in terms of immediate health-related quality of life, which might contribute to early recovery of urinary function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess early and late-term outcomes of patients who had undergone pelvic exenteration and simultaneous fecal and urinary diversion with plain wet colostomy (PWC) or double-barrelled wet colostomy (DBWC). Materials and Methods: The medical records of all patients who had undergone pelvic exenteration and urinary diversion between 2006 and 2017 at our hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Results: In total, 15 patients with a mean age of 56 ± 13 years were included in the study. Simultaneous urinary and fecal diversions were carried out as PWC (n = 8), or DBWC (n = 7). No significant differences were found between PWC and DBWC groups in terms of operation time (373.7 ± 66.5 versus 394.2 ± 133.2 min, P = .955), estimated blood loss (862.8 ± 462.4 versus 726.2 ± 489.4 mL, P = .613), length of hospital stay (13.2 ± 9.1 versus 14.1 ± 6.9 days), early complications (25% versus 28.6%, P = 1.0) and late term complications (37.5% versus 42.9%, P = 1.0). The rate of recurrent pyelonephritis in PWC group was higher than DBWC group but not statistically significant (37.5% versus 14.3%, P = .569). Overall survival (OS) of the patients was 385 ± 91 days. There was no difference between OS of patients with PWC and DBWC (414 ± 165 versus 352 ± 70 days, P = .618). Conclusion: PWC and DBWC are valid options for creating simultaneous urinary and fecal diversion after extensive pelvic surgery in patients with short life expectancy. DBWC might be superior to PWC in terms of decreased risk of recurrent pyelonephritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of TachoSil and Floseal during laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery (LNSS), and to evaluate postoperative complications, especially hemorrhage and urinary leakage. Materials and Methods: The medical records of all patients that underwent LNSS for a small renal mass (SRM) performed by the same experienced surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the following 3 groups, based on hemostatic agent: group 1: no adjuvant hemostatic agent (no AHA); group 2: TachoSil; group 3: Floseal. Results: The study included 79 patients; no AHA group: n = 18; TachoSil group: n = 25; Floseal group: n = 36. The 3 groups were similar in terms of diameter [29.6 ± 11.5 mm, 26.4 ± 13.4 mm and 30.4 ± 9.6 mm, respectively (P = .218)] and PADUA scores [6.9 ± 0.9, 6.7 ± 1 and 6.9 ± 0.9, respectively (P =.540)]. Mean duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the Floseal group (120.9 ± 23.1 minutes) than in the no AHA group (156.6 ± 34.4 minutes). Mean ischemia time was longest in the no AHA group (24.3 ± 4 minutes) and shortest in the Floseal group (21.3 ± 4.3 minutes). Intra-abdominal (IA) catheter drainage on postoperative day 1 was significantly higher in the no AHA group than in the TachoSil and Floseal groups [156.9 ±78.3 mL vs. 72.6 ± 64.5 and 60.8 ± 30.2 mL, respectively (P < .05)]. Mean duration of hospitalization was 3.2 ± 0.5 days in the no AHA group that was significantly longer than in the Floseal group (2.8 ± 0.7 days) (P = .043). There were not any differences in intraoperative complications, the transfusion rate, surgical margin positivity, or postoperative complications between the 3 groups (P = .596, P = .403, P = 1.0, P = .876, respectively). However, pseudoaneurism as a late term complication occurred in 27.7% patients in the no AHA group. Conclusion: TachoSil and Floseal are safe and effective adjuvant treatments for patients undergoing LNSS. They might be useful especially in preventing pseudo aneurisms, shortening intraoperative ischemia time and hospital stay and decreasing postoperative drainage. Shortened operation and warm ischemia time may also be attributed to long learning curve of LNSS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Orthotopic neobladder is a well-established surgical solution for continent urinary diversion after radical cystectomy. Nevertheless, it still represents a challenging surgery. Some critical issues of orthotopic bladder substitution include relevant complication rates, renal function impairment, urinary incontinence and patient quality of life. We present a new ileal neobladder technique, Vesuvian Orthotopic Neobladder (VON), performed for the first time at our institution in 2020. The main purpose of this new surgical procedure is to simplify and speed up the reservoir reconstruction through a ten standardized technical steps and obtain an appropriate bladder capacity at the same time.   METHODS: Inclusion criteria were muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma or non muscle-invasive high risk bladder cancer patients fit for bladder substitution. The exclusion criteria were locally advanced cancer, presence of hydronephrosis, renal or hepatic impairment. A chest-abdominal CT scan and urinary cytology were performed before the procedure. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as required. Overall, operative time, bladder reconfiguration time, hospitalization time, catheterization time were recorded. All complications associated with the procedure were classified according to the Clavien Dindo score. The bladder volume was evaluated by ultrasound three months after the surgery.   RESULTS: A total of six male patients diagnosed with non-metastatic muscle-invasive or high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy followed by VON reconfiguration were included in the study. Mean age was 62.8 (±4.9) years; all selected patients enjoyed good health conditions (Charlson Comorbidity Index 4-6). One patient presented with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Four patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Mean overall operative time was 273.3 (±18.6) minutes. Average time for neobladder reconstruction was 63.7 (±16.1) minutes. There were no intraoperative complications. A single case of urethral anastomosis leakage occurred and was treated conservatively. Bladder volume on ultrasound evaluation ranged between 250 and 290 ml.  Day time and nocturnal continence were observed in four and three patients, respectively.   CONCLUSION: The new VON technique is a good alternative to traditional orthotopic bladder procedures. VON reconstruction seems to offer the advantage of speeding up the procedure, reducing intestinal compromise with good storage capacity. The ten surgical steps can be considered a good starting point for further improvements in surgical technique. More robust data regarding the number of procedures and the duration of follow-up is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of TachoSil and Floseal during laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery (LNSS), and to evaluate postoperative complications, especially hemorrhage and urinary leakage., Materials and Methods: The medical records of all patients that underwent LNSS for a small renal mass (SRM) performed by the same experienced surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the following 3 groups, based on hemostatic agent: group 1: no adjuvant hemostatic agent (no AHA); group 2: TachoSil; group 3: Floseal., Results: The study included 79 patients; no AHA group: n = 18; TachoSil group: n = 25; Floseal group: n = 36. The 3 groups were similar in terms of diameter [29.6 ± 11.5 mm, 26.4 ± 13.4 mm and 30.4 ± 9.6 mm, respectively (P = .218)] and PADUA scores [6.9 ± 0.9, 6.7 ± 1 and 6.9 ± 0.9, respectively (P =.540)]. Mean duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the Floseal group (120.9 ± 23.1 minutes) than in the no AHA group (156.6 ± 34.4 minutes). Mean ischemia time was longest in the no AHA group (24.3 ± 4 minutes) and shortest in the Floseal group(21.3 ± 4.3 minutes). Intra-abdominal (IA) catheter drainage on postoperative day 1 was significantly higher in the no AHA group thanin the TachoSil and Floseal groups [156.9 ±78.3 mL vs. 72.6 ± 64.5 and 60.8 ± 30.2 mL, respectively (P < .05)]. Mean duration of hospitalization was 3.2 ± 0.5 days in the no AHA group that was significantly longer than in the Floseal group (2.8 ± 0.7 days) (P = .043). There were not any differences in intraoperative complications, the transfusion rate, surgical margin positivity, or postoperative complications between the 3 groups (P = .596, P =.403, P = 1.0, P = .876, respectively). However, pseudoaneurism as a late term complication occurred in 27.7% patients in the no AHA group., Conclusion: TachoSil and Floseal are safe and effective adjuvant treatments for patients undergoing LNSS. They might be useful especially in preventing pseudo aneurisms, shortening intraoperative ischemia time and hospital stay and decreasing postoperative drainage. Shortened operation and warm ischemia time may also be attributed to long learning curve of LNSS.