Search

With the discovery of Porcine circovirus type 2d (PCV2d) in the USA in 2012 and subsequent genotype shift from the previously predominant PCV2b to PCV2d in the face of widespread PCV2a vaccination, concerns over PCV2 vaccine efficacy were raised. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two similarly produced PCV2 vaccines, one containing the PCV2a capsid and the other one containing the PCV2b capsid, in the conventional pig model against PCV2d/porcine parvovirus 2 (PPV2) co-challenge. A co-challenge was added since there is evidence that PPV2 may exacerbate PCV2 infection and since PCV2 only rarely causes disease in experimentally infected pigs, hence vaccine efficacy can be difficult to assess. In brief, sixty 3-week-old-pigs from a PCV2 seropositive farm without evidence of active virus replication (no PCV2 viremia, low antibody titers with no evidence of increase after two consecutive bleedings) were blocked by PCV2 antibody titer and then randomly divided into three groups with 20 pigs each, a non-vaccinated group (challenge control), a PCV2a vaccinated group (VAC2a) and a PCV2b vaccinated group (VAC2b). Vaccinations were done at 4 and again at 6 weeks of age. At 8 weeks of age, all pigs were challenged with a PCV2d strain via intranasal and intramuscular routes of inoculation followed by intramuscular administration of PPV2 one day later. PCV2 vaccination, regardless of PCV2 genotype, resulted in significantly higher humoral and cellular immunity compared to non-vaccinated challenge control pigs as evidenced by increased numbers of interferon (IFN) γ secreting cells after PCV2d stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected prior to challenge. Furthermore, PCV2a and PCV2b vaccinations both reduced PCV2d viremia and PCV2-associated pathological lesions. Under the study conditions, the PCV2a and PCV2b vaccine preparations each induced immune responses and clinical protection against a heterologous PCV2d/PPV2 co-challenge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The predominant genotype of porcine circovirus (PCV) in the pig population today is PCV2b yet PCV2a-based commercial vaccines are considered effective in protecting against porcine circovirus associated disease. The objective of this study was to compare the ability of PCV2a- and PCV2b-based vaccines to control PCV2b viremia in a challenge model that mimics the U.S. field situation. Sixty-three pigs were randomly assigned to one of eight groups. Sixteen pigs were vaccinated with an experimental live-attenuated chimeric PCV1-2a vaccine based on genotype 2a and another 16 pigs with a chimeric PCV1-2b vaccine based on genotype 2b. Challenge was done 28 days post vaccination (dpv) using PCV2b (or a combination of PCV2a and PCV2b), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), and porcine parvovirus (PPV) to mimic what commonly occurs in the field. The experiment was terminated 21 days post challenge (dpc) or 49dpv. Pigs vaccinated with the chimeric PCV1-2b vaccine had significantly higher levels of PCV1-2b viremia and shedding of the PCV1-2b vaccine virus in feces and nasal secretions but also a more robust humoral immune response as evidenced by significantly higher ELISA S/P ratios compared to the PCV1-2a vaccination. Regardless of challenge, the PCV1-2b vaccination significantly reduced the prevalence and amount of PCV2 viremia compared to the PCV1-2a vaccination. Interestingly, in the non-vaccinated pigs concurrent PCV2a infection resulted in clinical disease and increased macroscopic lung lesions compared to pigs challenged with PCV2b alone, further supporting the idea that concurrent PCV2a/PCV2b infection is necessary for optimal PCV2 replication. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]