3 results on '"Jauneikaite E"'
Search Results
2. Meeting report: Towards better risk stratification, prevention and therapy of invasive GBS disease, ESPID research meeting May 2022.
- Author
-
Snoek L, Karampatsas K, Bijlsma MW, Henneke P, Jauneikaite E, Khan UB, Zadoks RN, and Le Doare K
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Pregnancy, Animals, Antibiotic Prophylaxis methods, Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use, Risk Assessment, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious prevention & control, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious microbiology, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious drug therapy, Streptococcal Infections prevention & control, Streptococcal Infections drug therapy, Streptococcal Infections immunology, Streptococcal Infections microbiology, Streptococcus agalactiae genetics, Streptococcus agalactiae immunology
- Abstract
The European Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (ESPID) hosted the third Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Research Session in Athens on 11th May 2022, providing researchers and clinicians from around the world an opportunity to share and discuss recent advances in GBS pathophysiology, molecular and genetic epidemiology and how these new insights can help in improving prevention and control of early- and late-onset GBS disease. The meeting provided a state-of-the-art overview of the existing GBS prevention strategies and their limitations, and an opportunity to share the latest research findings. The first presentation provided an overview of current GBS prevention and treatment strategies. In the second presentation, the genomic and antimicrobial resistance profiles of invasive and colonizing GBS strains were presented. The third presentation explained the association of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) with the development of late-onset disease (LOD) and the interplay of host innate immunity and GBS. The fourth presentation evaluated the role of genomics in understanding horizontal GBS transmission. The fifth presentation focused on the zoonotic links for certain GBS lineages and the last presentation described the protective role of breastmilk. Talks were followed with interactive discussions and concluded with recommendations on what is needed to further GBS clinical research; these included: (i) the development of better risk stratification methods by combining GBS virulence factors, serological biomarkers and clinical risk factors; (ii) further studies on the interplay of perinatal antimicrobials, disturbances in the development of host immunity and late-onset GBS disease; (iii) routine submission of GBS isolates to reference laboratories to help in detecting potential clusters by using genomic sequencing; (iv) collaboration in animal and human GBS studies to detect and prevent the emergence of new pathogenic sequence types; and (v) harnessing the plethora of immune factors in the breastmilk to develop adjunct therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Systematic review of Group B Streptococcal capsular types, sequence types and surface proteins as potential vaccine candidates.
- Author
-
Bianchi-Jassir F, Paul P, To KN, Carreras-Abad C, Seale AC, Jauneikaite E, Madhi SA, Russell NJ, Hall J, Madrid L, Bassat Q, Kwatra G, Le Doare K, and Lawn JE
- Subjects
- Aged, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Membrane Proteins, Multilocus Sequence Typing, Pregnancy, Streptococcus agalactiae genetics, Streptococcal Infections epidemiology, Streptococcal Infections prevention & control, Vaccines
- Abstract
Background: 21 million pregnant women worldwide (18%) are estimated to carry Group B Streptococcus (GBS), which is a risk for invasive disease in newborns, pregnant women, and stillbirths. Adults ≥ 60 years or with underlying health conditions are also vulnerable to invasive GBS disease. We undertook systematic reviews on GBS organism characteristics including: capsular polysaccharide (serotype), sequence type (multi-locus sequence types (MLST)), and virulence proteins. We synthesised data by at-risk populations, to inform vaccine development., Methods: We conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses to estimate proportions of GBS serotypes for at risk populations: maternal colonisation, invasive disease in pregnant women, stillbirths, infants 0-90 days age, and older adults (≥60 years). We considered regional variation and time trends (2001-2018). For these at-risk population groups, we summarised reported MLST and surface proteins., Results: Based on 198 studies (29247isolates), 93-99% of GBS isolates were serotypes Ia, Ib, II, III, IV and V. Regional variation is likely, but data gaps are apparent, even for maternal colonisation which has most data. Serotype III dominates for infant invasive disease (60%) and GBS-associated stillbirths (41%). ST17 accounted for a high proportion of infant invasive disease (41%; 95%CI: 35-47) and was found almost exclusively in serotype III strains, less present in maternal colonisation (9%; 95%CI:6-13),(4%; 95%CI:0-11) infant colonisation, and adult invasive disease (4%, 95%CI:2-6). Percentages of strains with at least one of alp 1, alp2/3, alpha C or Rib surface protein targets were 87% of maternal colonisation, 97% infant colonisation, 93% infant disease and 99% adult invasive disease. At least one of three pilus islands proteins were reported in all strains., Discussion: A hexavalent vaccine (serotypes Ia, Ib, II, III, IV and V) might provide comprehensive cover for all at-risk populations. Surveillance of circulating, disease-causing target proteins is useful to inform vaccines not targeting capsular polysaccharide. Addressing data gaps especially by world region and some at-risk populations (notably stillbirths) is fundamental to evidence-based decision-making during vaccine design., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.