Search

Since the introduction of the meningococcal C conjugate (MCC) vaccine in the pediatric population in 1999, numerous clinical studies have confirmed the immunogenicity and safety of the NeisVac-C(®) vaccine, and several have observed a strong immune response after a single priming dose, which could be successfully boosted. Maximizing protection of infants with as few vaccine doses as possible would increase the general acceptability of the immunization strategies and support broader coverage without increasing vaccination costs. This was a randomized feasibility study of a single priming NeisVac-C(®) vaccine dose administered at 4 or 6 months of age, compared to the currently licensed two dose priming at 2 and 4 months of age, followed by a booster vaccination at 12-13 months of age. High seroprotection rates and serum bactericidal antibody (rSBA) titers were observed in all study groups, whether a single or two dose priming vaccination was administered, at all time points investigated: one month after the priming vaccination(s) (>99% of subjects rSBA≥8), prior to booster vaccination (>65% of subjects with rSBA≥8, with the lowest titers and GMTs seen in the two dose priming group), as well as after booster vaccination administration (99% with rSBA≥128 in all three study groups, with the highest GMT of 2472 seen in the 4 month single dose group). This study confirmed trends seen in previous reports that a single-dose priming vaccination at 4 or 6 months of age can be considered a valuable alternative to the currently licensed two-dose priming vaccination schedule., (Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Influenza pandemic preparedness involves priming of the population with pre-pandemic vaccines. Such vaccines should be well tolerated and induce a long-lasting immunological memory that can effectively be boosted with a single dose of pandemic vaccine once available. The presented studies assessed different prime-boost regimens with a Vero cell-derived whole virus non-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine., Methods: In one study, 281 healthy adult (18-59 years) and 280 elderly (≥ 60 years) subjects received two vaccinations, 21 days apart, with Vero cell-derived whole virus non-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine (7.5 μg HA Antigen A/Vietnam/1203/2004) followed by a 6, 12-15, or 24 month booster (7.5 or 3.75μg A/Indonesia/05/2005 or A/Vietnam/1203/2004). In the other study, 230 healthy adults (18-59 years) received single dose priming (7.5 μg A/Vietnam/1203/2004) followed by a 12 month booster (7.5 or 3.75 μg A/Indonesia/05/2005). Antibody responses were assessed by microneutralization (MN) and single radial hemolysis (SRH) assay. Vaccine safety was assessed throughout., Results: Two dose priming was equally immunogenic in adults and the elderly: >72% of subjects in each population achieved MN titers ≥ 1:20 after the second vaccination. Booster vaccinations at 6, 12-15, and 24 months induced substantial antibody increases to both strains: after a 7.5 μg A/Indonesia/05/2005 booster, 93-95% of adults and 72-84% of the elderly achieved MN titers ≥ 1:20 against this strain. Homologous and heterologous booster responses were higher in the 7.5μg dose group than in the 3.75 μg dose group. Booster responses following single dose priming were similar; a 7.5 μg booster dose induced homologous MN titers ≥ 1:20 in 93% of subjects., Conclusions: A Vero cell derived whole virus non-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine is well tolerated and induces long-lasting cross-clade immunological memory that can be effectively boosted 1-2 years after two dose or single dose priming, supporting its suitability for pre-pandemic vaccination., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This phase 1/2 open-label, randomized clinical study investigated the safety and immunogenicity of a non-adjuvanted, whole virus, Vero cell-derived H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine (A/H1N1/California/07/2009) in children and adolescents (6 months to 17 years). Subjects were stratified by age (6-11 months, 12-35 months, 3-8 years, 9-17 years) to receive two vaccinations 21 days apart of either the 3.75 μg or 7.5 μg dose. A booster with a licensed trivalent seasonal (2010/2011) influenza vaccine was administered one year after the first vaccination to a subgroup that had previously received the 7.5 μg dose. A single vaccination with the 7.5 μg dose induced high seroprotection rates in all subjects, namely: 88.0% (9-17 years); 68.0% (3-8 years); 42.9% (12-35 months); and 50.0% (6-11 months). Following a second vaccination, seroprotection rates ranged from 84.2% to 100%. GMTs after two vaccinations with the 7.5 μg dose (as determined by HI) were also substantial: reaching 210.0 (9-17 years), 196.2 (3-8 years), 118.9 (12-35 months) and 99.6 (6-11 months). Antibody persistence was demonstrated at 6 months (GMTs ranging from 65.6 to 212.8 with the 7.5 μg dose) and at 12 months (GMTs ranging from 33.6 to 124.1 with the 7.5 μg dose) after primary vaccination. The booster vaccination induced a strong response to the A/California/07/2009 strain, reaching 100% seroprotection in all age groups, with GMTs ranging from 640.0 to 886.3. The vaccine was well tolerated, inducing low adverse reaction rates (overall fever rate: 6% after the first vaccination; 7% after the second vaccination), even in young children. These data confirm that the H1N1 whole-virus Vero cell-derived pandemic influenza vaccine is suitable for use in children and adolescents; a 2-dose primary vaccination induces a memory response in a naïve population that can be effectively boosted with the A/H1N1/California/07/2009 component of a seasonal influenza vaccine. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00976469., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune responses to novel pandemic influenza vaccines may be influenced by previous exposure to antigenically similar seasonal strains., Methods: An open-label, randomized, phase I/II study was conducted to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a non-adjuvanted, inactivated whole-virus H1N1 A/California/07/2009 vaccine. 408 subjects were stratified by age (18-59 and >60 years) and randomized 1:1 to receive two vaccinations with either 3.75 or 7.5 μg hemagglutinin antigen 21 days apart. Safety, immunogenicity and the influence of seasonal influenza vaccination and antibody cross-reactivity with a seasonal H1N1 strain was assessed., Results: A single vaccination with either dose induced substantial increases in H1N1 A/California/07/2009 hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and neutralizing (MN) antibody titers in both adult and elderly subjects. A single 7.5 μg dose induced seroprotection rates of 86.9% in adults and 75.2% in elderly subjects. Two 7.5 μg vaccinations induced seroprotection rates in adult and elderly subjects of 90.9% and 89.1%, respectively. The robust immune response to vaccination was confirmed by analyses of neutralizing antibody titers. Both HI and MN antibodies persisted for ≥ 6 months post-vaccination. Between 34% and 49% of subjects had seroprotective levels of H1N1 A/California/07/2009 antibodies at baseline. Higher baseline HI titers were associated with receipt of the 2008-09 or 2009-10 seasonal influenza vaccine. High baseline A/California/07/2009 neutralizing antibody titers were also associated with high baseline titers against A/New Caledonia/20/99, a seasonal H1N1 strain which circulated and was included in the seasonal vaccine from 2000-01 to 2006-07. Pre-adsorption with A/H1N1/New Caledonia/20/99 antigen reduced A/H1N1/California/07/2009 baseline titers in 55% of tested sera. The vaccine was well tolerated with low rates of fever., Conclusions: A whole-virus H1N1 A/California/07/2009 vaccine was safe and well tolerated and a single dose induced substantial immune responses similar to seasonal influenza vaccines, probably due to immunological priming by previous seasonal influenza vaccines or infections., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cell culture technologies have the potential to improve the robustness and flexibility of influenza vaccine supply and to substantially shorten manufacturing timelines. We investigated the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of a Vero cell culture-derived seasonal influenza vaccine and utilized these studies to establish a serological correlate of vaccine protection., Methods: Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase III trials were undertaken in the US during the 2008-2009 Northern hemisphere influenza season, in young (18-49 years) and older (50-64 years and ≥ 65 years) adult subjects. 7250 young adults were randomized 1:1 to receive either Vero-derived vaccine or placebo. 3210 older adult subjects were randomized 8:1 to receive either Vero-derived vaccine or a licensed egg-derived vaccine. Serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers were assessed 21 days post-vaccination. Vaccine efficacy in preventing cell culture-confirmed influenza infection was determined for the young adult population. Local and systemic adverse events were recorded in both studies., Results: The Vero-derived vaccine was safe and well tolerated in both young and older adults. All US and European immunological licensing thresholds were comfortably met in both populations. Vaccine efficacy in young adults was 79% against A/H1N1 viruses antigenically matching the corresponding vaccine strain and 78.5% for all antigenically matched influenza viruses. A hemagglutination inhibition antibody titer of ≥ 1:15 provided a reliable correlate of protection for the Vero-derived influenza vaccine, with no additional benefit at titers >1:30. Bridging of the correlate of protection established in the young adult population to the older adult immunogenicity data demonstrated the likely effectiveness of the Vero-derived vaccine in the older adult population., Conclusions: A Vero cell culture-derived seasonal influenza vaccine is safe, immunogenic and protects against infection with influenza virus. The novel vaccine technology has the potential to make a substantial contribution to improving influenza vaccine supply., Clinical Trial Registration: The studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00566345 and NCT00782431., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A successful vaccine development strategy for areas with clustered H5N1 events requires conduct of vaccine trials in potentially non-naïve subjects and evaluation of post-vaccination responsiveness. An open-label, randomized, phase I/II study therefore assessed the immunogenicity and safety of two different dose levels of an inactivated, non-adjuvanted, whole virus clade 2.1 (A/Indonesia/05/2005) H5N1 Vero cell-derived influenza vaccine in healthy adults (21-45 years) from a region where the virus has been circulating (Hong Kong) as well as Singapore. Subjects (N=110) were randomized 1:1 to receive two vaccinations with either 3.75 μg or 7.5 μg H5N1 haemagglutinin antigen 21 days apart. Safety, immunogenicity (microneutralization [MN] and single radial haemolysis [SRH] at baseline and post-vaccination) and cross-reactivity against a heterologous clade 1 strain (A/Vietnam/1203/2004) of the vaccine were assessed. Pre-existing immunity to the vaccine strain was 14% which is higher than previously reported for these regions. Two vaccinations with either vaccine formulation induced high seroprotection rates (MN titre ≥ 1:20) against the vaccine strain A/Indonesia/05/2005: 82.7% and 86.5% in the 3.75 μg and 7.5 μg dose groups. Seroconversion rates and fold increase exceeded the CPMP criterion of >40% and >2.5 for MN and SRH in both dose groups after the second vaccination, while the seroprotection rate in the 7.5 μg dose group determined by SRH was only marginally lower (69.2%) than the CPMP criterion of >70%. Thus, 11 of 12 CHMP criteria were fulfilled. A cross-reactive antibody response against the heterologous A/Vietnam/1203/2004 strain was demonstrated after the second vaccination (>21% by MN and ≥ 25% by SRH). Persistence of antibodies against the vaccine strain was also demonstrated 6 months after the first vaccination, indicating that a booster vaccination would be effective in those who have received two priming doses. No serious adverse events were reported. The H5N1 influenza vaccine against clade 2.1 strain A/Indonesia/05/2005 was well tolerated and immunogenic after two vaccinations, and induced a cross-neutralizing antibody response, with no dose effect., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ross River virus (RRV) is endemic in Australia and several South Pacific Islands. Approximately 5000 cases of RRV disease, which is characterized by debilitating polyarthritis, are recorded each year in Australia. This study describes the first clinical trial of a candidate RRV vaccine., Methods: An inactivated whole-virus Vero cell-derived RRV vaccine was tested in 382 healthy, RRV-naïve adults in a phase 1/2 dose-escalation study at ten sites in Austria, Belgium and The Netherlands. Subjects were equally randomized to receive 1.25 μg, 2.5 μg, 5 μg, or 10 μg aluminum hydroxide-adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted RRV vaccine, with a second dose after three weeks and a booster at six months. Vaccine immunogenicity was determined by measurements of serum IgG and neutralizing antibody titers. Vaccine tolerability and safety were monitored over the entire study period., Results: The optimal vaccine formulation was the adjuvanted 2.5 μg dose, as calculated using a repeated mixed model analysis of covariance comparing log-transformed RRV-specific IgG titers between different dose groups. Geometric means of RRV-specific serum antibodies measured 21 days after the third vaccination with the 2.5 μg adjuvanted formulation were 520.9 (90% CI 377.2-719.4) as determined by IgG ELISA and 119.9 (82.6-173.9) as determined by virus neutralization assay, resulting in seropositivity rates of 92.9% (82.6-98.0) and 92.7% (82.2-98.0), respectively. All vaccine formulations and doses were well tolerated after the first, second and third vaccination., Conclusions: The adjuvanted, inactivated whole-virus Vero cell-derived Ross River virus vaccine is highly immunogenic in RRV-naïve adults and well tolerated at all dose levels., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The need for highly effective tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccines has increased globally due to a variety of factors including climate, social, economic and demographic changes, which are thought to have promoted the expansion of the endemic region of TBE viruses. The first TBE vaccine, FSME-IMMUN Inject, was introduced in the 1970s and has been continually improved since then to enhance both its safety and immunogenicity. The current formulation was established in 2001 and is marketed as FSME-IMMUN. This review summarizes findings of the clinical development programme since 2001 regarding determination of the optimal dose, conventional and rapid vaccination schedules, vaccination in adults, the elderly and special patient populations, safety, immunogenicity, and immunopersistence in adults and children, comparison of FSME-IMMUN with another commercially available TBE vaccine as well as post-marketing vaccination outcome. This successful research programme demonstrated the strong immunogenicity and continued safety of the FSME-IMMUN vaccine, which is further confirmed by the performance reported under field conditions., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

TBE vaccination strategies capable of inducing strong paediatric immunogenicity and acceptable reactogenicity are still under evaluation. This single-blind, multi-center, randomized, controlled, phase III clinical study compared the immunogenicity and safety of the two paediatric TBE vaccines available in Europe (FSME-IMMUN Junior and Encepur Children) following administration of two doses of either vaccine in 303 children aged 1-11 years. Regardless of immunological test or viral antigen used, immunological responses were consistently higher in children vaccinated with FSME-IMMUN Junior than those vaccinated with Encepur Children. FSME-IMMUN Junior is also non-inferior to Encepur Children, with respect to NT seropositivity rates (p<0.0001). Systemic reaction rates were low and similar between the vaccines. However, among children aged 7-11 years, local reactions were significantly higher after the first (p<0.01) and second (p<0.001) vaccination with Encepur Children than with FSME-IMMUN Junior, affecting half the children in the former group: 22.4% and 10.2% with FSME-IMMUN Junior vs. 49.0% and 51.0% for Encepur Children., ((c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Two dose-finding studies and one open label safety study with a paediatric FSME-IMMUN formulation were conducted in children and adolescents aged 1-15 years (N=3697). The 1.2 microg antigen dose was identified as the optimal dose, inducing high seroconversion rates following the primary vaccination series. Adolescents (aged 12-15 years) vaccinated with the optimal paediatric dose (1.2 microg) attained similarly high seroprotective rates to adults (aged 16-35 years) vaccinated with the 2.4 microg formulation of FSME-IMMUN. We concluded that the FSME-IMMUN paediatric vaccine formulation is safe and highly immunogenic, not only for children <12 years, but also for adolescents <16 years., ((c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A prospective, randomised, multicentre, single-blind phase 3 study was performed to assess the safety of a vaccination schedule consisting of two vaccinations (21-35 days apart) with the tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine FSME-IMMUN "adults" (five consecutive lots) in comparison to another licensed TBE vaccine (Encepur), with polygeline) (two lots) in healthy volunteers (n=3966) aged 16-65 years. The safety of the third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN "adults" (6 months after the first vaccination) was investigated in a follow-up study on the same population (n=3705) and TBE antibody titres were analysed pre- and post-vaccination in a subgroup of volunteers (n=564). Following the first vaccination, the overall incidence of fever (> or =38.0 degrees C) was 0.8% in the FSME-IMMUN "adults" study group and 5.6% in the comparator study group; fever was mainly mild. The fever rate after the second vaccination was 0.6% and 0.5% in the two study groups, respectively. Local and systemic reactions after the first vaccination occurred with a lower frequency in the FSME-IMMUN "adults" study group than in the comparator group. Upon analysing the tolerability of the third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN "adults", similar results were determined in both study groups of volunteers previously vaccinated with FSME-IMMUN "adults" or with the comparator vaccine. The immunogenicity results demonstrated similar seroconversion rates (as determined by ELISA or neutralization test) before and after the third vaccination in the FSME-IMMUN "adults" group and in the comparator group respectively. The results of both studies demonstrate that: (1) FSME-IMMUN "adults" is safe and highly immunogenic, (2) all five production lots of FSME-IMMUN "adults" were consistent with respect to a low rate of adverse events, (3) FSME-IMMUN "adults" induces considerably lower adverse reaction rates than the comparator vaccine after the first vaccination, and (4) two vaccinations with the comparator vaccine can be successfully followed by a third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN "adults".

Two clinical studies were conducted to identify the optimal dose of a modified tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine (FSME-IMMUN "new") in adults. A prospective, randomised, phase II, double-blind dose-finding study with the FSME-IMMUN "new" vaccine was performed in volunteers aged 16-65 years (n=405) to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of two vaccinations with three vaccine doses (0.6, 1.2 and 2.4microg antigen). The safety and immunogenicity of the third vaccination were investigated in a follow-up study on the same study population. Antibody response to vaccination was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and, after the third vaccination, by neutralisation test (NT). Seroconversion rates (ELISA) in the different dose groups (0.6, 1.2 and 2.4 microg) were 85.1, 96.2 and 97.0%, respectively, after the second vaccination, which 73% of the volunteers received only 21 days after the first vaccination. Seroconversion rates after the third vaccination were 96, 99.2 and 100% (ELISA) as well as 77, 93 and 96.6% (NT) with the 0.6, 1.2 and 2.4 microg doses, respectively. No unexpected AEs or vaccine-related serious adverse events (SAE) were observed during either study. Local and systemic reactions were mainly mild and not dose-dependent, with an overall fever rate of <1% after the first vaccination. The 2.4 microg dose is the optimal dose for the FSME-IMMUN "new" preparation in adults, as it was found to: (1) be non-inferior to the 1.2 microg dose with respect to fever rate after the first vaccination; (2) induce the highest seroconversion rate; and (3) be well-tolerated with respect to local and systemic reactions. The results of both studies demonstrate that the FSME-IMMUN "new" vaccine is safe and highly immunogenic in adults.

A new, highly purified, inactivated tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine FSME-IMMUN "NEW" has been developed by Baxter using a production virus seed derived from chick embryo cells instead of mouse brain. In clinical trials, the vaccine was shown to be highly immunogenic and well tolerated in adults and children. Following licensure in 2001, the tolerability of half the adult dose of FSME-IMMUN "NEW" (1.2 microg antigen/0.25 ml) was investigated in a post-marketing surveillance in 1899 children aged 6 months to 12 years. Rectal body temperature was measured daily for 3 days after the first vaccination. An overall fever rate of 20.3% (95% CI=18.5; 22%) was observed, which was mostly mild in nature (>38.0 to