Search

Background In the absence of field efficacy studies, estimating the real-world effectiveness of vaccines may consider immunogenicity from randomized controlled clinical trials and real-world adherence. Combining seroprotection rates (SPRs) with regimen completion rates gives an estimate of an effective vaccine protection rate (eVPR), which can be leveraged to evaluate real-world cost-effectiveness by linking it with vaccine costs to estimate the cost-per-protected patient (CPP). Methods This study evaluated eVPR and CPP as estimates of vaccine clinical- and cost-effectiveness of two-dose (HepB-CpG) and three-dose (HepB-Alum) hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccines in the general adult population and a subpopulation with diabetes mellitus. eVPR was calculated from head-to-head SPR data from phase 3 clinical trials directly comparing HepB-CpG and HepB-Alum vaccine regimens and real-world head-to-head adherence data. CPP was calculated as the average cost of each regimen divided by eVPR. Results Higher eVPR in the adult population was achieved with HepB-CpG (68.0%) versus HepB-Alum (41.6%), reflecting the combination of higher SPR and vaccine regimen completion. The CPP for HepB-CpG ($331.31) was $45.67 (95% CI: $36.66, $55.19) less than HepB-Alum ($377.09). Greater savings were observed among persons with diabetes, with CPP $149.60 (95% CI: $80.29, $195.63) lower with HepB-CpG ($367.57) than HepB-Alum ($517.37). Conclusions Metrics estimating vaccine real-world effectiveness and value may guide informed decisions in vaccine selection. For example, using eVPR and CPP, HepB-CpG represents a more effective, value-advantaged approach than HepB-Alum toward reducing HBV infection.

Background Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and are poorly responsive to HBV vaccines. Current vaccine recommendations for hemodialysis patients utilize more than twice the amount of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) used for healthy adults and achieve lower immune responses. Methods An open-label, single-arm, multicenter trial was conducted among adults 18 years of age and older who were initiating or undergoing hemodialysis who had not previously received hepatitis B vaccine. Participants received four doses of HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B®) (20 mcg rHBsAg + 3000 mcg CpG 1018, a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist) administered at 0, 4, 8, and 16 weeks. Participants are being followed for 68 weeks. This paper reports the final immunogenicity analysis of the primary endpoint at study week 20 and an interim safety analysis. Results We enrolled 119 participants receiving hemodialysis who were followed for a median of 47.4 weeks. Of the 119 participants, 75 were in the per-protocol population. At week 20, the seroprotection rate (% with antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen [anti-HBs] ≥ 10 mIU/mL) was 89.3% and the percentage of participants with anti-HBs ≥ 100 mIU/mL was 81.3%. The anti-HBs geometric mean concentration was 1061.8 mIU/mL. HepB-CpG was well tolerated with no observed safety concerns. Conclusion In patients receiving hemodialysis, HepB-CpG given as four doses was well tolerated and induced very high anti-HBs concentrations and seroprotection in a very high proportion of recipients.

The hepatitis B virus is highly infectious and can cause incurable liver disease, leading to high morbidity rates, increased healthcare utilization, and high mortality. Multiple preventative hepatitis B vaccine options have been available for decades, but adherence to the traditional 6-month vaccine schedule for the approved 3-dose series remains low in adult populations at risk of hepatitis B exposure. A 2-dose hepatitis B vaccine (HEPLISAV-B) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2017 induces rapid seroprotection within 1 month and has a safety profile comparable to a commonly used 3-dose vaccine. In a previous cost-effectiveness study, HEPLISAV-B had a favorable cost-effectiveness profile for multiple at-risk populations. The goal of the current analysis was to update and extend previous findings by evaluating cost-effectiveness of HEPLISAV-B compared with a 3-dose vaccine (Engerix-B) in selected adult populations, including patients with diabetes, chronic liver or kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, healthcare personnel, travelers to countries with endemic hepatitis B, and a public health population. Cost-effectiveness was measured as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using a health economics Markov model that accounts for adherence rates, seroprotection rates, healthcare costs, and current pricing considerations. Patients progressed between a series of health states, and the difference in lifetime spending and survival for individuals receiving either HEPLISAV-B or Engerix-B was estimated from the perspective of a US managed care payer, HEPLISAV-B had favorable cost-effectiveness profiles for patients with diabetes, healthcare personnel, travelers, and patients with chronic liver disease and dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis supported the robustness of the cost-effectiveness profiles, and an additional analysis indicated that HEPLISAV-B was cost-effective in the general adult population. Overall, HEPLISAV-B was cost-effective in multiple adult populations recommended for HBV vaccination in the United States.

Background Hepatitis B virus infection remains an important global public health problem. Approved alum-adjuvanted vaccines are well tolerated but require three doses and have reduced immunogenicity in adults. A two-dose vaccine containing hepatitis B surface antigen combined with a novel, Toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant (HBsAg-1018 [HEPLISAV–B®]) has demonstrated significantly higher seroprotection rates than a three dose vaccine. Methods A post hoc analysis compared the safety of HBsAg-1018 with HBsAg-Eng (Engerix-B®), in three randomized, observer-blinded, active-controlled, multi-center phase 3 trials in adults. HBsAg-1018 was administered intramuscularly at weeks 0 and 4 and placebo at week 24 and HBsAg-Eng at weeks 0, 4, and 24. Results Post-injection reactions, adverse events, medically attended adverse events, and new-onset immune-mediated adverse events were balanced between vaccine groups. Anti-nuclear antibodies, anti-double stranded DNA antibodies, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, and antiphospholipid antibodies were balanced between groups. A transient increase in anti-beta2 glycoprotein 1 IgM was observed in the HBsAg-1018 group but was not associated with a thrombotic event. Serious adverse events and deaths were generally balanced between groups. Conclusion HBsAg-1018 had a similar safety profile to HBsAg-Eng. With improved immunogenicity and fewer doses over a shorter time, HBsAg-1018 has the potential to provide improved seroprotection and a significant public health benefit to adults 18 years of age or older.

Background Hepatitis B virus infection remains an important public health problem in the United States. Currently approved alum-adjuvanted vaccines require three doses and have reduced immunogenicity in adults, particularly in those who have diabetes mellitus, or are older, male, obese, or who smoke. Methods Phase 3 observer–blinded, randomized (2:1 HBsAg-1018 [HEPLISAV-B™]:HBsAg-Eng [Engerix-B®]), active–controlled trial in adults 18–70 years of age. HBsAg-1018 was administered intramuscularly at weeks 0 and 4 and placebo at week 24 and HBsAg-Eng at weeks 0, 4, and 24. The primary immunogenicity endpoint assessed the noninferiority of the seroprotection rate at week 28 in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Secondary endpoints included seroprotection rates in the total trial population and by age, sex, body mass index, and smoking status. Results Among 8374 participants randomized, 961 participants in the per-protocol population had type 2 diabetes mellitus. In diabetes participants, the seroprotection rate in the HBsAg-1018 group at week 28 was 90.0%, compared with 65.1% in the HBsAg-Eng group, with a difference of 24.9% (95% CI: 19.3%, 30.7%), which met the prospectively-defined criteria for noninferiority and statistical significance. In the total study per-protocol population (N = 6826) and each pre-specified subpopulation, the seroprotection rate in the HBsAg-1018 group was statistically significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group. Conclusion Two doses of HBsAg-1018, administered over 4 weeks, induced significantly higher seroprotection rates than three doses of HBsAg-Eng, given over 24 weeks, in adults with factors known to reduce the immune response to hepatitis B vaccines as well as in those without those factors. With fewer doses in a shorter time, and greater immunogenicity, HBsAg-1018 has the potential to significantly improve protection against hepatitis B in adults at risk for hepatitis B infection. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02117934.

Background Immunologic response to a complete vaccine regimen of currently licensed alum-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccines is reduced in several subpopulations, including older adults, men, obese persons, and smokers. Two phase 3 trials in healthy adults demonstrated that 2 doses over 1 month of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine (HBsAg-1018) induced superior seroprotection rates (SPRs) to 3 doses over 6 months of the licensed vaccine Engerix-B ® (HBsAg-Eng). Methods An exploratory analysis of immunogenicity was conducted in subpopulations from pooled data for the 2 phase 3 trials. Results In each subpopulation, the peak SPR in the HBsAg-1018 group was statistically significantly higher than the peak SPR in the HBsAg-Eng group. Peak HBsAg-1018 SPRs ranged from 91.6% to 99.7%, while peak HBsAg-Eng SPRs ranged from 67.7% to 92.9%. Conclusion In these exploratory analyses, 2 doses of HBsAg-1018 induced statistically significantly higher rates of seroprotection than 3 doses of HBsAg-Eng across all subpopulations.

Many patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are hyporesponsive to currently licensed alum-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccines, including Engerix-B(®) (HBsAg-Eng). Seroprotection rates (SPRs) are further reduced in CKD patients with diabetes mellitus. Three doses of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine (HBsAg-1018) that uses a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist demonstrated superior SPRs to 4 double doses of HBsAg-Eng in a large phase 3 trial of CKD patients.A prespecified subgroup analysis of immunogenicity was conducted in CKD participants with type 2 diabetes in the phase 3 trial.In 328 participants, the peak SPR in the HBsAg-1018 group met criteria for noninferiority and superiority to the peak SPR in the HBsAg-Eng group. The peak geometric mean concentration of antibody against hepatitis B surface antigen in the HBsAg-1018 group was statistically significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group.HBsAg-1018 induced significantly higher seroprotection than HBsAg-Eng in CKD patients with diabetes.

Background Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are commonly hyporesponsive to HBV vaccines. Current recommendations for CKD patients are to utilize 4 double-doses (2 × 20 mcg HBsAg) of a licensed hepatitis B vaccine (HBsAg-Eng). Methods An observer-blind, randomized, active-controlled, parallel group, multicenter trial was conducted among 521 patients 18–75 years of age with CKD, comparing 3 single doses of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine (20 mcg rHBsAg + 3000 mcg 1018, a toll-like receptor 9 agonist) given at 0, 4, and 24 weeks to 4 double-doses of HBsAg-Eng (2 × 20 mcg rHBsAg + 500 mcg alum) given at 0, 4, 8, and 24 weeks (total of 8 injections). Participants were followed for 1 year. Results Among 467 participants in the modified intent-to-treat population, at the primary endpoint at week 28, the seroprotection rate (SPR: % with anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL) in the HBsAg-1018 group (89.9%) met criteria for noninferiority and superiority to the SPR in the HBsAg-Eng group (81.8%). At week 28, the percentage of participants with anti-HBs ≥ 100 mIU/mL in theHBsAg-1018 group (73.6%) was significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group (63.2%). In addition, the geometric mean concentration of anti-HBs in the HBsAg-1018 group (587.1 mIU/mL) was significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group (156.5 mIU/mL). At weeks 8 and 12 after the first study injection, SPRs in the HBsAg-1018 group were significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group. At 52 weeks, the immune response toHBsAg-1018 remained higher than to HBsAg-Eng. HBsAg-1018 was generally well tolerated and had a similar safety profile to HBsAg-Eng. Conclusion In CKD patients, 3 doses of HBsAg-1018 induced significantly higher seroprotection, earlier seroprotection, and more durable seroprotection than 4 double doses of HBsAg-Eng.

HEPLISAV™ is an adult hepatitis B vaccine that requires fewer doses over a shorter period of time and elicits higher and earlier seroprotection compared to Engerix-B to reduce the risk of hepatitis B infection. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with HEPLISAV vs. Engerix-B(®) to prevent hepatitis B infection in select populations.Markov models were developed for the following populations: diabetics, patients with chronic or end stage kidney disease, healthcare workers and international travelers to countries with high HBV infection prevalence. Hepatitis B disease progression was modeled using 11 health states: seroprotected, susceptible, acute infection, chronic infection, fulminant hepatic failure, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplant, post-transplant care, and death. Seroprotection rates were obtained from two phase 3 clinical trials comparing HEPLISAV with Engerix-B and ranged across various populations from 89-96% for HEPLISAV and 62-81% for Engerix-B. Higher vaccination completion rates were assumed for HEPLISAV compared with Engerix-B given that fewer doses of HEPLISAV are required in a shorter period of time to achieve seroprotection for the evaluated populations. Each cycle length after the first year in the model was 1-year. All future costs and benefits were discounted at 3%. A lifetime analysis and a U.S. payer perspective were used.HEPLISAV has a favorable cost-effectiveness profile with incremental cost effectiveness ratios$25,000 across all populations studied. In the patients with chronic or end stage kidney disease, HEPLISAV was the dominant option and was cost-saving compared with Engerix-B. The cost of vaccine, regimen completion rates, and seroprotection rates were the sensitive variables in the models.HEPLISAV is a cost-effective option to provide high rates of seroprotection and early seroprotection across a range of populations from health care workers to patients with chronic or end stage kidney disease.

Background The currently licensed hepatitis B vaccines have limitations including hyporesponsiveness in older adults, poor compliance, and the extended time for most persons to develop seroprotection (e.g. >6 months). A vaccine containing HBsAg combined with a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant (HBsAg-1018) has been developed to overcome these limitations. Methods A Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, subject- and observer-blinded, active-controlled trial was conducted among healthy subjects 40–70 years of age comparing the immunogenicity and safety of two doses of HBsAg-1018 at 0 and 4 weeks to three doses of licensed hepatitis B vaccine, HBsAg-Eng, at 0, 4, and 24 weeks. The primary immunogenicity endpoint was noninferiority of the seroprotection rate (SPR; % with anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL) of HBsAg-1018 compared to the SPR of HBsAg-Eng at 8 weeks following the last dose of vaccine. Conditional upon meeting noninferiority, superiority of HBsAg-1018 over HBsAg-Eng was assessed. Safety was compared between the two vaccines. Results At the primary endpoint, the SPR for the HBsAg-1018 group (90.0%) was superior to the SPR for the HBsAg-Eng group (70.5%) with an SPR difference of 19.5% (95% CI, 14.7%, 24.7%). At week 28 when the SPR peaked in the HBsAg-Eng group (72.8%), the SPR in the HBsAg-1018 group (94.8%) was significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group. The SPR in the HBsAg-1018 group was significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group at each study visit from week 4 through week 52. The safety profiles for the two vaccines were similar. Conclusion When compared to the HBsAg-Eng three-dose regimen given at 0, 1, and 6 months, HBsAg-1018 demonstrated superior seroprotection with only two doses at 0 and 1 month. The safety profile of HBsAg-1018 was comparable to that of the licensed vaccine, HBsAg-Eng. HBsAg-1018 would provide a significant public health contribution toward the prevention of hepatitis B infection.