1. From Multiple Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Care Toward Hospital Variation of a Summary Measure
- Author
-
Vos, E.L. (Elvira), Koppert, L.B. (Linetta B.), Jager, A. (Agnes), Vrancken Peeters, M.-J.T.F.D. (Marie-Jeanne T.F.D.), Siesling, S. (Sabine), Lingsma, H.F. (Hester), Vos, E.L. (Elvira), Koppert, L.B. (Linetta B.), Jager, A. (Agnes), Vrancken Peeters, M.-J.T.F.D. (Marie-Jeanne T.F.D.), Siesling, S. (Sabine), and Lingsma, H.F. (Hester)
- Abstract
Objectives: To improve quality in breast cancer care, large numbers of quality indicators are collected per hospital, but benchmarking remains complex. We aimed to assess the validity of indicators, develop a textbook outcome summary measure, and compare case-mix adjusted hospital performance. Methods: From a nationwide population-based registry, all 79 690 nonmetastatic breast cancer patients surgically treated between 2011 and 2016 in 91 hospitals in The Netherlands were included. Twenty-one indicators were calculated and their construct validity tested by Spearman's rho. Between-hospital variation was expressed by interquartile range (IQR), and all valid indicators were included in the summary measure. Standardized scores (observed/expected based on case mix) were calculated as above (>100) or below (<100) expected. The textbook outcome was presented as a continuous and all-or-none score. Results: The size of between-hospital variation varied between indicators. Sixteen (76%) of 21 quality indicators showed construct validity, and 13 were included in the summary measure after excluding redundant indicators that showed collinearity with others owing to strong construct validity. The media
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF