Search

When an autologous vein is not available for lower extremity revascularization, prosthetic grafts are often required. However, prosthetic bypass grafts have limited patency for infrageniculate reconstruction. To potentially improve patency, a new geometric modification of the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft, Distaflo (Impra, Tempe, AZ), has been developed for lower extremity bypass. We reviewed our early experience with the Distaflo graft in patients who required infrageniculate bypass for lower extremity ischemia when no suitable autologous saphenous vein was available. All patients were maintained on warfarin anticoagulation postoperatively. All grafts were followed at 6- to 12-week intervals with duplex ultrasound evaluation. Patient characteristics, operative procedures, and graft surveillance information were maintained on a computerized registry. Thirty-two patients with limb-threatening ischemia underwent 35 infrageniculate reconstructions with a Distaflo graft between February 26, 1999, and August 24, 2000. Thirty-two of 35 bypasses were performed on extremities that had previously undergone a surgical procedure. Forty-eight previous revascularization procedures were done on these 25 extremities. Thirty grafts were constructed to the tibial outflow sites, whereas the remaining five grafts were placed to the below-knee popliteal artery. One patient died on the second postoperative day secondary to unrelated causes, and only one graft (3%) failed during the same hospitalization. Fifteen of 35 grafts (43%) remained patent 1 to 30 months later. Four patent grafts (6%) were ligated between 2 and 14 months for infectious indications. When considering the 20 failed grafts, 9 patients underwent major amputation, 5 patients remain with chronically ischemic limbs, and 6 patients underwent additional bypass grafts. Twenty-three patients (72%) maintained limb salvage. The Distaflo PTFE graft achieves promising early patency for complex infrageniculate revascularization and may be used as an alternative conduit in patients with critical limb ischemia who do not have an adequate vein for lower extremity revascularization.

Commercially available aortic stent grafts differ in construction and clinical advantage such that creating hybrid endografts by combining components from different manufacturers is sometimes useful. We describe a multicenter experience using hybrid endografts to treat patients with challenging anatomy. Hospital records and office charts were reviewed from four institutions. Hybrid endografts were defined as those with two types of covered stents in continuity to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Indications for hybrid grafts were defined by type of endoleak and whether an endoleak was expected or unexpected as determined by the preoperative radiographic evaluation. Endpoints include intraoperative endoleaks, late endoleaks, change in aneurysm size, and rupture. Hybrid endografts were used to treat AAA (endovascular aneurysm repair [EVAR]) in 90 patients, representing 7.9% of the total multicenter experience. In 7 patients (7.8%), a hybrid graft construction as a secondary procedure successfully corrected a type 1 endoleak. In the remaining 83 patients (92.2%), hybrid grafts were created at the time of original EVAR to treat expected challenging anatomy or unexpected endoleaks. Hybrid endografts corrected 88 (97.8%) type 1 endoleaks, but 2 patients (2.2%) persisted with a proximal type 1 leak requiring conversion. During follow-up of 1 to 24 months, computed tomography and ultrasound surveillance, available for 73 patients (81.1%), detected one unresolved distal type 1 (1.1%) and seven type 2 (7.8%) endoleaks. Aneurysm size decreased at least 0.5 cm in 23 of 50 patients (46.0%) at 6 months and in 19 of 31 patients (61.3%) at 12 months. Aneurysm size increased at least 0.5 cm in 4 of 50 patients (8.0%) at 6 months and in 1 of 31 patients (3.2%) at 12 months. There were no ruptures. Hybrid endografts have favorable early and intermediate results in the treatment of AAA. Long-term follow-up will be needed to confirm the absence of significant adverse biomaterial interaction and the effect on AAA exclusion. We advocate the use of hybrid endografts as endovascular therapy for patients whose anatomy may be unsuitable for a single endograft type.