Search

Current histoprognostic parameters and prognostic scores used in paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas do not adequately predict the risk of metastastic progression and survival. Here, using a series of 147 cases of paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma, we designed and evaluated the potential of a new score, the COPPS (COmposite Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma Prognostic Score), by taking into consideration three clinico-pathological features (including tumor size, necrosis, and vascular invasion), and the losses of PS100 and SDHB immunostain to predict the risk of metastasis. We compared also the performance of the COPPS with several presently used histoprognostic parameters in risk assessment of these tumors. A PASS score (Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal gland Scaled Score) ≥ 6 was significantly associated with the occurrence of metastases (P < 0.0001) and shorter PFS (P = 0.013). In addition, both MCM6 and Ki-67 LI correlated with worse PFS (P = 0.004 and P < 0.0001, respectively), and MCM6, but not Ki-67, was significantly higher in metastatic group (P = 0.0004). Loss of PS100 staining correlated with the occurrence of metastasis (P < 0.0001) and shorter PFS (P < 0.0001). At a value of greater or equal to 3, the COPPS correlated with shorter PFS (P < 0.0001), and predicted reproducibly (weighted Kappa coefficient, 0.863) the occurrence of metastases with a sensitivity of 100.0% and specificity of 94.7%. It thus surpassed those found for either PASS, SDHB, MCM6, or Ki-67 alone. In conclusion, while validation is still necessary in independent confirmatory cohorts, COPPS could be of great potential for the risk assessment of metastasis and progression in paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas.

Minichromosome maintenance complex component 6 (MCM6) is involved in initiating DNA replication and is upregulated during licensed G0 phase of the cell cycle. This early expression permits its labeling of more proliferating cells than those by Ki-67. Here using a cohort of 89 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, we report findings made on the prognostic value of MCM6 based on immunohistochemical labeling index (LI) of the protein in comparison with that of Ki67 as no such information is currently available. Additionally, we examined the prognostic values of these markers based on their mRNA expression using a cohort of uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC, n = 307) taken from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Our evidence indicated the presence of a positive correlation between the LI of MCM6 and the histological grade of endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (grade I, 66.7%; grade II, 75.3%; grade III, 81.4%; p < 0.001) and an inverse correlation between the LI of MCM6 and the overall and progression-free survival (p = 0.02 for both). The LI of Ki-67 correlated with grade (p < 0.001), but not survival. The MCM6 and Ki-67 inter-observer intra-class correlation coefficients were excellent: 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.91) and 0.84 (0.77-0.90), respectively. For in silico analyses of the TCGA cohort, both univariate and multivariate Cox analyses (p = 0.003 and p = 0.03, respectively) revealed high MCM6 mRNA Z-scores associated with reduced overall survival. This association was absent for Ki-67. MCM6 is thus a highly reproducible marker of poor prognosis in endometrial cancer. Evaluation of MCM6 should thus be considered in daily practice for risk stratification.