Search

E1, an ATP-dependent DNA helicase, is the only enzyme encoded by papillomaviruses (PVs). It is essential for replication and amplification of the viral episome in the nucleus of infected cells. To do so, E1 assembles into a double-hexamer at the viral origin, unwinds DNA at the origin and ahead of the replication fork and interacts with cellular DNA replication factors. Biochemical and structural studies have revealed the assembly pathway of E1 at the origin and how the enzyme unwinds DNA using a spiral escalator mechanism. E1 is tightly regulated in vivo, in particular by post-translational modifications that restrict its accumulation in the nucleus. Here we review how different functional domains of E1 orchestrate viral DNA replication, with an emphasis on their interactions with substrate DNA, host DNA replication factors and modifying enzymes. These studies have made E1 one of the best characterized helicases and provided unique insights on how PVs usurp different host-cell machineries to replicate and amplify their genome in a tightly controlled manner., (© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Integration of human papillomaviruses into that of the host promotes genomic instability and progression to cancer; factors that promote integration remain to be fully identified. DNA damage agents can promote double strand breaks during DNA replication providing substrates for integration and we investigated the ability of DNA damage to regulate HPV E1 and E2 mediated DNA replication. Results demonstrate that HPV E1 and E2 replication is not arrested following DNA damage, both in vivo and in vitro, while replication by SV40 Large T antigen is arrested and ATR is the candidate kinase for mediating the arrest. LTAg is a target for PIKK DNA damage signalling kinases, while E1 is not. We propose that the failure of E1 to be targeted by PIKKs allows HPV replication in the presence of DNA damaging agents. Such replication will result in double strand breaks in the viral genome ultimately promoting viral integration and cervical cancer., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Previously, we and others have shown that CCAAT displacement protein (CDP) negatively regulates the papillomavirus promoters. Overexpression of CDP has been shown to inhibit high-risk human papillomavirus virus (HPV) and bovine papillomavirus DNA replication in vivo presumably through reduction in expression of viral replication proteins, E1 and E2. Sequence analysis of the HPV origin indicates several potential CDP-binding sites with one site overlapping the E1-binding site. Therefore, CDP could also negatively regulate papillomavirus replication directly by preventing the loading of the initiation complex. We show here that purified CDP inhibits in vitro HPV DNA replication. Footprint analysis demonstrated that CDP binds the E1-binding site and the TATA box, and that the binding of purified CDP to the E1-binding site is decreased by the addition of purified E2 protein. Consistent with this, E2-independent in vitro HPV replication is inhibited by CDP to a greater extent than E2-dependent replication. These results suggest that binding of E2 at the E2-binding site may play an important role in overcoming the inhibition of E1 initiation complex formation caused by the binding of negative regulators like CDP to the origin of replication.

The papillomavirus (PV) E2 protein plays a role in recruiting viral and cellular DNA replication factors, such as PV E1 or RPA to PV genomes. Using both purified proteins and through co-precipitation, it was determined that HPV-11 E2 binds human topoisomerase I. E2 can stimulate topoisomerase I DNA relaxation activity 3- to 4-fold. Conversely, topoisomerase I is unable to stimulate E2 DNA binding. These findings suggest that stimulation of topoisomerase I by E2 may help promote efficient relaxation of the torsional stress induced by PV DNA replication.

Binding of simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen to human and calf thymus topoisomerase I (topo I) was readily detected by using modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and immunoblots. In addition to WT T antigen, binding could also be readily demonstrated with T antigen fragments from the amino-terminal region as well as with fragments missing this region, but much less so with small t antigen or with human p53. Antibody-blocking experiments showed that a monoclonal antibody that binds to the N-terminal region and several antibodies that recognize the central region of T antigen interfere with the binding to topo I. Our data are consistent with the existence of two separate topo I-binding regions in T antigen, one mapping within residues 82 to 246 and an apparently weaker one present after residue 246. By comparing the binding of T antigen to topo I with that of T antigen to DNA polymerase alpha or RPA, a single-stranded DNA-binding protein, it was determined that the T antigen-topo I interaction is much stronger and that the binding sites for topo I and DNA polymerase overlap, whereas the one for RPA differs. Several unwinding-defective mutants of T antigen were partially defective in their binding to topo I, suggesting that the binding to topo I is required for unwinding circular DNA. Finally, immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that T antigen can interact with DNA-bound topo I, indicating that such an interaction may take place during SV40 DNA replication.