Search

The use of non-destructive examination (NDE) for assessing the quality of butt fusion joints in polyethylene (PE) pipes has been included in the draft Mandatory Appendix XXVI to Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (Rules for construction of Class 3 buried polyethylene pressure piping). However, currently, there are no acceptance criteria for flaws in butt fusion joints in PE pipes. There is an ASME Task Group on flaw evaluation for PE pipe, which is developing a code case using linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) to determine critical flaw sizes. However, the initial experimental crack growth data generated suggests that linear elastic fracture mechanics is not able to adequately describe slow crack growth in PE materials. In addition, this work is only considering planar lack of fusion flaws in the joint; it is not considering other critical flaw types that can occur in butt fusion joints, such as particulate contamination and cold fusion. TWI has developed procedures using mechanical testing to develop flaw acceptance criteria for butt fusion joints in PE pipes. This is based on inserting lack of fusion flaws of known size and particulate contamination flaws of known concentrations into butt fusion joints and determining the effect of these flaws on both the short-term and long-term integrity of the joints. An important aspect of this work is to determine which of the wide array of mechanical tests available for assessing the integrity of butt fusion joints in PE pipes are the most discriminating. This paper describes the procedures developed for inserting simulated flaws into butt fusion joints in PE pipes, the experimental work to compare the results from different standard short-term and long-term tests on flawed and unflawed joints and the procedures developed to determine flaw acceptance criteria. Results have shown that the most discriminating short-term test for butt fusion joints in PE pipes is a tensile test using a waisted specimen, such as those defined in EN 12814-2, EN 12814-7 and ISO 13953, and the most discriminating property is the energy to break the specimen. The most appropriate long-term test for butt fusion joints in PE pipes is the whole pipe tensile creep rupture test, as defined in EN 12814-3; this is the only long-term whole pipe test that consistently generates slow crack growth in the fused joint, even if it contains no flaws.

The desire to use high-density polyethylene (HDPE) piping in buried Class 3 service and cooling water systems in nuclear power plants is primarily motivated by the material’s high resistance to corrosion relative to that of steel alloys. The rules for construction of Class 3 HDPE pressure piping systems were originally published as an alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME BPVC) in ASME Code Case N-755 and were recently incorporated into the ASME BPVC Section III as Mandatory Appendix XXVI (2015 Edition). The requirements for HDPE examination are guided by criteria developed for metal pipe and are based on industry-led HDPE research and conservative calculations. Before HDPE piping will be generically approved for use in U.S. nuclear power plants, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) must have independent verification of industry-led research used to develop ASME BPVC rules for HDPE piping. With regard to examination, the reliability of volumetric inspection techniques in detecting fusion joint fabrication flaws against Code requirements needs to be confirmed. As such, confirmatory research was performed at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) from 2012 to 2015 to assess the ability of phased-array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) as a nondestructive evaluation (NDE) technique to detect planar flaws, represented by implanted stainless steel discs, within HDPE thermal butt-fusion joints. All HDPE material used in this study was commercially dedicated, 305 mm (12.0 in.) nominal diameter, dimension ratio (DR) 11, PE4710 pipe manufactured with Code-conforming resins, and fused by a qualified and experienced operator. Thermal butt-fusion joints were fabricated in accordance with or intentionally outside the standard fusing procedure specified in ASME BPVC. The implanted disc diameters ranged from 0.8–2.2 mm (0.03–0.09 in.) and the post-fabrication positions of the discs within the fusion joints were verified using normal- and angled-incidence X-ray radiography. Ultrasonic volumetric examinations were performed with the weld beads intact and the PA-UT probes operating in the standard transmit-receive longitudinal (TRL) configuration. The effects of probe aperture on the ability to detect the discs were evaluated using 128-, 64-, and 32-element PA-UT probe configurations. Results of the examinations for each of the three apertures used in this study will be discussed and compared based on disc detection using standard amplitude-based signal analysis that would typically be used with the ultrasonic volumetric examination methods found in ASME BPVC.

This paper presents a method for investigating the integrity of high density polyethylene (HDPE) butt fusion joints and mitered joints. The scanning technique utilizes an ultrasonic phased array pitch-catch scanning method that provides full volumetric coverage of the fusion zone for the detection of inclusions and surface-breaking defects. Empirical results supported by numerical modeling are presented. Additionally, the effects of temperature on focalization and the proper countermeasures are discussed.Copyright © 2015 by ASME

The integrity of high density polyethylene (HDPE) piping and fusion joints are a topic of interest to the nuclear industry, regulators, ASME code, and the plastics pipe industry. The ASME Code Case N-755-1 has been approved and addresses the use of HDPE in safety related applications. Over the last few years some of the concerns identified with the parent HDPE pipe material and the fusion joints have been addressed while others are still being resolved. One such unresolved concern is the effect of the fusion process on the integrity of the joint, specifically, the introduction of flaws during the fusion process. The potential impact of flaws in the fusion joint on the service life of the HDPE piping is being evaluated. The current study calculates stress intensity factors (SIF) for circumferential flaws and uses them to evaluate the potential structural integrity of HDPE fusion joints in pipes. The recent API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 standard provides SIF (KI) solutions to various semi-elliptical and full-circumferential (360°) surface cracks/flaws on the outer surface (OD) and the inner surface (ID). The API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 standard SIF tables and finite element analysis (FEA) of selected cases were used to develop simplified SIF relations for full-circumferential surface flaws that can be used for plastic pipes with diameters ranging from 101.6 mm (4 inch) through 914.4 mm (36 inch) and dimensional ratios (DRs) from 7 through 13. Further, the SIF of embedded flaws akin to lack-of-fusion regions was evaluated. The results from this study serve as precursors to understanding and advancing experimental methods to address important issues related to the critical tolerable flaw size in the butt-fusion joint material and were utilized to select the specimen tests and hydrostatic pipe tests used to evaluate various joining processes. Further, they will help with understanding the essential variables that control the long-term component integrity and structural performance of HDPE pipe joints in ASME Class 3 nuclear piping.