Search

Background and Objectives The clinical significance of autoimmune thrombocytopenia ( ITP) is reflected by bleeding and/or an increased bleeding risk due to low platelet counts. In most cases, treatment with high-dose (1-2 g/kg body weight) intravenous immunoglobulin has been demonstrated to result in an increase in platelet counts after one day of treatment. Until now, there is little information on the true beginning of therapy effect in patients treated with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin. In this study, we focused on the kinetic of platelet counts and cessation of bleeding within the first 24 h of treatment. Materials and methods Nineteen patients with chronic ITP were treated with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin due to clinically relevant bleeding and/or for increased bleeding risk. Results Although the response was variable in treated patients, cessation of bleeding was observed within 12 h in all such affected patients ( n = 7), even in patients with platelet counts that were not increased ( n = 3). Furthermore, platelet counts were observed to increase already within 1 h in 10 (53%) patients and within 8 h in 12 (63%) patients. Conclusions From a clinical perspective, the onset of therapeutic effects of intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with ITP may occur at an earlier stage and be superior to that previously expected. Failure to measure an increase in platelets in the circulation of 'non-responders' may be explained by an increased consumption of platelets due to recognizable or unrecognizable bleeding in such affected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of escalating infusion rates of BT090, a 10% intravenous immunoglobulin ( IVIg), were studied in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease. Materials and Methods In Part A, patients ( n = 30) received 3 infusions of BT090 at their pretrial dose and dosing interval; the infusion rate of BT090 was increased from 0·3 to 1·4 to 2·0 ml/kg/h for each infusion in each patient initially at 30-min intervals. Pharmacokinetics was evaluated at the 3rd infusion ( n = 24). At the 4th infusion, infusion rates were to be gradually escalated from 0·3 to 1·4 to 4·0 to a maximum of 8·0 ml/kg/h initially at 30-min intervals to establish the maximum tolerated infusion rate per patient. Results The pharmacokinetic characteristics and safety profile of BT090 were comparable with those of other IVIgs, including Intratect®. Escalation of infusion rates was well tolerated, allowing identification of individual patient's maximum tolerated infusion rate. At subsequent infusions, all patients tolerated their individually defined maximum infusion rate: 17 patients (68·0%) tolerated infusion rates of 6·0 or 8·0 ml/kg/h and four patients (16%) had maximum tolerated infusion rates of <4·0 ml/kg/h at subsequent infusions. Escalation of infusion rates shortened infusion time from a median of around 2·5 h to around 1·6 h. SAEs were reported in three patients, but none was related to BT090 treatment. Conclusions Shortening infusion time may reduce overall healthcare spending, for example nursing time needed, and also minimize disruption of patients' daily routine, especially for those patients in work or school settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]