1. Incorporated Vernolate and Other Weed Control Treatments for Peanut Production
- Author
-
F. L. Selman, R. P. Upchurch, and H. L. Webster
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,010602 entomology ,Agronomy ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Production (economics) ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Plant Science ,Biology ,Weed control ,01 natural sciences ,Agronomy and Crop Science - Abstract
Fifteen herbicidal treatments were evaluated for weed control effectiveness in peanut (Arachis hypogaeaL.) culture at three locations in the peanut production area of eastern North Carolina during 1964 and 1965. Delayed preemergence treatments of 4,6-dinitro-o-sec-butylphenol (DNBP) alone and in combination withO-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)O-methyl isopropylphosphoroamidothioate (DMPA) were superior to conventional herbicidal and non-herbicidal control methods as were single and multiple incorporated treatments ofS-propyl dipropylthiocarbamate (vernolate). A single postplant vernolate treatment incorporated 1 in deep provided weed control superior to that obtained for single preplant vernolate treatments incorporated 1 in or 3 in deep. Increased weed control and increased peanut safety were obtained from 2.5 lb/A of vernolate by incorporating treatments at 0, 7, and 14 days after planting rather than by using a single application. This multiple treatment was the optimum one evaluated and provided 53 days of control and required 10 hr/A of hoeing time.
- Published
- 1968