Search

One of the keys to the success of WiMAX is its capability of supporting traffic with heterogeneous quality of service (QoS) requirements. The current standard specifies the general QoS architecture for WiMAX but the design of the main building blocks (e.g., connection admission control, packet schedulers) is left up to the vendors' implementation. This gap motivates the paper that aims to design and analyse a channel-aware QoS framework for efficiently managing radio resources in a WiMAX network. The proposed architecture integrates the specifications of (1) a connection admission control module and a packet scheduler implemented at the base station (BS) to manage bandwidth requests from the subscriber stations (SSs), and (2) a scheduler at the SS that distributes the granted resources among the active data flows. Simulation results show that the proposed framework enables QoS differentiation and intra-class fairness, and demonstrate that a combined design of the BS and SS schedulers is necessary for effective QoS provisioning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The design of effective radio resource management policies for group-oriented services in beyond-4G networks is attracting the interest of the research community. Along this line, this paper analyzes some novel approaches that take advantages of the Device to Device (D2D) communication paradigm with the aim of improving the session quality experienced by mobile users in terms of delay and energy consumption. The basic idea is to enable receivers with a bad cellular link from the evolved Node B (eNodeB) to receive the multicast service through another mobile device located in proximity over a direct link. Two schemes are proposed that exploit different radio technologies to enable nearby multicast subscribers to establish direct local links, either Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A) or Wi-Fi Direct. The effectiveness of the proposed solutions is demonstrated through a comprehensive simulative analysis and compared with traditional techniques that only exploit point-to-multipoint communication from the eNodeB to all the group members not taking advantages of the multi-user diversity or alternative network technologies to serve the multicast users. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]