1. Malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Which is the best therapeutic option?
- Author
-
Troncone E, Fugazza A, Cappello A, Del Vecchio Blanco G, Monteleone G, Repici A, Teoh AYB, and Anderloni A
- Subjects
- Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal adverse effects, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal economics, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal instrumentation, Endosonography economics, Endosonography instrumentation, Endosonography methods, Gastric Outlet Obstruction diagnosis, Gastric Outlet Obstruction etiology, Gastroenterostomy adverse effects, Gastroenterostomy economics, Gastroenterostomy instrumentation, Humans, Jejunum surgery, Length of Stay economics, Length of Stay statistics & numerical data, Neoplasm Staging, Palliative Care economics, Pancreatic Neoplasms pathology, Pancreatic Neoplasms surgery, Quality of Life, Reoperation economics, Self Expandable Metallic Stents adverse effects, Self Expandable Metallic Stents economics, Stomach diagnostic imaging, Stomach surgery, Stomach Neoplasms pathology, Stomach Neoplasms surgery, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome, Ultrasonography, Interventional, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal methods, Gastric Outlet Obstruction surgery, Gastroenterostomy methods, Palliative Care methods, Pancreatic Neoplasms complications, Stomach Neoplasms complications
- Abstract
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) is a clinical condition characterized by the mechanical obstruction of the pylorus or the duodenum due to tumor compression/infiltration, with consequent reduction or impossibility of an adequate oral intake. MGOO is mainly secondary to advanced pancreatic or gastric cancers, and significantly impacts on patients' survival and quality of life. Patients suffering from this condition often present with intractable vomiting and severe malnutrition, which further compromise therapeutic chances. Currently, palliative strategies are based primarily on surgical gastrojejunostomy and endoscopic enteral stenting with self-expanding metal stents. Several studies have shown that surgical approach has the advantage of a more durable relief of symptoms and the need of fewer re-interventions, at the cost of higher procedure-related risks and longer hospital stay. On the other hand, enteral stenting provides rapid clinical improvement, but have the limit of higher stent dysfunction rate due to tumor ingrowth and a subsequent need of frequent re-interventions. Recently, a third way has come from interventional endoscopic ultrasound, through the development of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy technique with lumen-apposing metal stent. This new technique may ideally encompass the minimal invasiveness of an endoscopic procedure and the long-lasting effect of the surgical gastrojejunostomy, and brought encouraging results so far, even if prospective comparative trial are still lacking. In this Review, we described technical aspects and clinical outcomes of the above-cited therapeutic approaches, and discussed the open questions about the current management of MGOO., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: Dr. Anderloni reports personal fees from Boston Scientific, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Boston Scientific, outside the submitted work; Dr. Repici reports personal fees from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Fujifilm, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Fujifilm, outside the submitted work; Dr. Teoh reports personal fees from Microtech Medical Corporations, personal fees from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Cook, personal fees from Taewoong, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Microtech Medical Corporations, personal fees from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Cook, personal fees from Taewoong, outside the submitted work; The other Authors declare no conflict of interests., (©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF